Abstract
Background:
The number of lymph nodes (LNs) excised during extended pelvic LN dissections (ePLND) in prostate cancer (PCa) is related to complications including lymphoceles (up to 15%) and lymphedema (up to 14%). Approaches that reduce the resection of LNs related to healthy anatomies may help reduce the complication rate. The aim of this study was to unravel the complexity of the pelvic lymphatics by researching to what extent the lymphatics draining the abdominal wall overlap with the ePLND template and the lymphatic metastatic spread of primary PCa lesions.
Methods:
This prospective (NCT05120973), single-center study included 10 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with ePLND. To visualize the lymphatic drainage of the abdominal wall, indocyanine green was injected intradermally at four sites distributed over the lower abdomen. In vivo fluorescence imaging was performed using the robot-integrated fluorescence endoscope. Harvested LNs were assessed for fluorescence and tumor content.
Results:
In total, 195 LNs were removed (average 20/patient); 56% of these nodes were fluorescent (average 11.5/patient). Three patients were positive pathological N stage (pN1), yielding 6 positive nodes, of which in two patients the tumor-positive nodes were also found to be fluorescent (3 nodes in total [50%]). Indicating overlapping patterns.
Conclusion:
Within the ePLND template there is a 56% overlap, on a nodal level, with the lymphatic drainage from the abdominal wall. Three fluorescent LNs also contained metastases, indicating that the lymphatic drainage of healthy tissues directly converges with the drainage of the primary PCa.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
