Abstract
Background:
To compare bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-derived body composition between women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls, and to investigate associations with metabolic, hormonal, and inflammatory markers.
Methods:
This cross-sectional study included 35 women with PCOS and 37 BMI-matched healthy controls, aged 18–40 years, with BMI <35 kg/m2. Clinical, anthropometric, metabolic, hormonal, and inflammatory parameters were assessed. Body composition was determined by direct segmental multifrequency BIA, including fat mass (FM), trunk fat mass (trunk FM), lean mass (LM), FM index, fat-to-lean mass ratio (F/L ratio), and trunk-to-peripheral fat ratio.
Results:
Women with PCOS (28 ± 5.3 years, 26.6 ± 3.6 kg/m2) had higher FM index, trunk FM, and F/L ratio, while LM did not differ. They also showed higher fasting insulin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), glycated hemoglobin type A1c (HbA1c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, free androgen index, testosterone, androstenedione, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, and lower sex hormone–binding globulin (SHBG). Among BIA parameters, FM, FM index, and F/L ratio showed more consistent associations with insulin resistance and selected inflammatory markers than trunk FM. In women with PCOS, these measures were positively correlated with fasting insulin and HOMA-IR and inversely correlated with SHBG. Associations with HbA1c and IL-6 were modest and not uniformly observed across all adiposity measures. No significant correlations were found with fasting glucose, HDL-c, triglycerides, or androgen levels.
Conclusions:
Women with PCOS exhibit higher adiposity, particularly reflected by FM index and F/L ratio, which show closer associations with metabolic and inflammatory dysfunction than trunk FM. These findings support the potential use of BIA as an accessible, low-cost, and noninvasive tool for the cross-sectional assessment of metabolic dysfunction in PCOS. Longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the clinical relevance of these associations.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
