In this chapter, we address issues related to using mobile telepresence robotics for social interaction between people in different locations. We examine this problem space from three perspectives: (a) designing for the robot user, who is in a remote location; (b) designing for people near the robot, who are interacting with the user; and (c) designing so that the conversation is not hampered by the technology. We identify and review a number of mobile telepresence robots that have been designed for such social interactions across a variety of applications, including business, education, and healthcare. Finally, we discuss areas for future research and development in mobile telepresence robots for social applications.
AdalgeirssonS. O.BreazealC. (2010, March). Mebot: A robotic platform for socially embodied presence. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 15–22). New York, NY: IEEE.
AgarwalR.LevinsonA. W.AllafM.MakarovD. V.NasonA.SuL. (2007). The RoboConsultant: Telementoring and remote presence in the operating room during minimally invasive urologic surgeries using a novel mobile robotic interface. Urology, 70, 970–974.
8.
AnvariM.McKinleyC.SteinH. (2005). Establishment of the world’s first telerobotic remote surgical service: For provision of advanced laparoscopic surgery in a rural community. Annals of Surgery, 241, 460.
BeerJ. M.TakayamaL. (2011). Mobile remote presence systems for older adults: Acceptance, benefits, and concerns. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (pp. 19–26). New York, NY: ACM.
BioccaF.HarmsC.GreggJ. (2001, May). The networked minds measure of social presence: Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. Paper presented at the 4th Annual International Workshop on Presence, Philadelphia, PA.
17.
BlowM.DautenhahnK.ApplebyA.NehanivC. L.LeeD. (2006). The art of designing robot faces: Dimensions for human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 331–332). New York, NY: ACM.
18.
BowmanD. A.CoquillartS.FroehlichB.HiroseM.KitamuraY.KiyokawaK.StuerzlingerW. (2008). 3D user interfaces: New directions and perspectives. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 28(6), 20–36.
19.
BradnerE.MarkG.HertelT. D. (2005). Team size and technology fit: Participation, awareness, and rapport in distributed teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 68–77.
20.
BurgardW.CremersA. B.FoxD.HähnelD.LakemeyerG.SchulzD.. . . ThrunS. (1998). The interactive museum tour-guide robot. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 11–18). Palo Alto, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
BuxtonW. (1992). Telepresence: Integrating shared task and person spaces. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface (Vol. 92, No. 1992, pp. 123–129). Toronto, Canada: Canadian Information Processing Society.
23.
BuxtonW.SellenA.SheasbyM. (1997). Interfaces for multiparty videoconferencing. In FinnK.SellenA.WilberS. (Eds.), Video mediated communication (pp. 385–400). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
CadenaA. (2011, April). Development of a low cost autonomous underwater vehicle for Antarctic exploration. In Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications (pp. 76–81). New York, NY: IEEE.
25.
CarruthersG. (2009). Is the body schema sufficient for the sense of embodiment? An alternative to de Vignemont’s model. Philosophical Psychology, 22, 123–142.
26.
CasperJ.MurphyR. R. (2003). Human–robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the World Trade Center. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 33, 367–385.
CestaA.CortellessaG.OrlandiniA.TiberioL. (2013). Evaluating telepresence robots in the field. In FilipeJ.FredA. (Eds.), Agents and artificial intelligence (pp. 433–448). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
29.
ChambersC. (2012). How robots make CEOs better bosses. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com
30.
ChellaliR.BaizidK. (2011). What maps and what displays for remote situation awareness and ROV localization? In Human interface and the management of information: Interacting with information (pp. 364–372). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
31.
ChenJ. Y. C.HaasE. C.BarnesM. J. (2007). Human performance issues and user interface design for teleoperated robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 37, 1231–1245.
32.
ChenM. J.ChiM. C.HsuC. T.ChenJ. W. (2003). ROI video coding based on H. 263+ with robust skin-color detection technique. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 49, 724–730.
33.
ChungK.GrathwohlK.PoropatichR.WolfS.HolcombJ. (2007). Robotic telepresence: Past, present, and future. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 21, 593–596.
CohenB.LanirJ.StoneR.GurevichP. (2011). Requirements and design considerations for a fully immersive robotic telepresence system. In Proccedings of HRI 2011 Workshop on Social Robotic Telepresence (pp. 16–22). Rome, Italy: ISTC-CNR. Retrieved from http://aass.oru.se/~ali/hri2011ws/camera/HRI_Robotic_telepresence11_Proceedings.pdf.
37.
ColtinB.BiswasJ.PomerleauD.VelosoM. (2012). Effective semi-autonomous telepresence. In RoeferT.MayerN. M.SavageJ.SaranlıU. (Eds.), RoboCup 2011: Robot Soccer World Cup XV (pp. 365–376). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
38.
CoradeschiS.KristofferssonA.LoutfiA.Von RumpS.CestaA.CortellessaG.GonzalezJ. (2011). Towards a methodology for longitudinal evaluation of social robotic telepresence for elderly. In Proceedings of HRI 2011 Workshop on Social Robotic Telepresence. (pp. 1–7). Rome, Italy: ISTC-CNR. Retrieved from http://aass.oru.se/~ali/hri2011ws/camera/HRI_Robotic_telepresence11_Proceedings.pdf
39.
CrandallJ. W.GoodrichM. A.OlsenD. R.Jr.NielsenC.W. (2005). Validating human–robot interaction schemes in multitasking environments. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 35, 438–449.
40.
CrandallJ. W.NielsenC. W.GoodrichM. A. (2003). Towards predicting robot team performance. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1, 906–911.
De LuciaA.FranceseR.PasseroI.TortoraG. (2008). SLMeeting: Supporting collaborative work in Second Life. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 301–304). New York, NY: ACM.
43.
DesaiM. (2012) Modeling trust to improve human–robot interaction (PhD thesis). University of Massachusetts, Lowell.
44.
DesaiM.MedvedevM.VázquezM.McSheehyS.Gadea-OmelchenkoS.BruggemanC.. . . YancoH. (2012). Effects of changing reliability on trust of robot systems. In 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 73–80). New York, NY: IEEE.
45.
DesaiM.TsuiK. M.YancoH. A.UhlikC. (2011). Essential features of telepresence robots. In Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications (pp. 15–20). New York, NY: IEEE.
46.
DhallA.SharmaG.BhattR.KhanG. M. (2009). Adaptive digital makeup. In Advances in visual computing (pp. 728–736). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
DingD.CooperR.GuoS.CorfmanT. (2004). Analysis of driving backward in an electric-powered wheelchair. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 12, 934–943.
51.
DiSalvoC. F.GemperleF.ForlizziJ.KieslerS. (2002). All robots are not created equal: The design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 321–326). New York, NY: ACM.
DraperJ. V. (1995). Teleoperators for advanced manufacturing: Applications and human factors challenges. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 5, 53–85.
55.
DraperJ. V.KaberD. B.UsherJ. M. (1998). Telepresence. Human Factors, 40, 354–375.
EndsleyM. R. (1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 97–101). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
FalconerJ. (2012b, February22). South Korea: Robot teachers rolling out in 2012. Plastic Pals. Retrieved from http://www.plasticpals.com/?p=21283
62.
FelsD. I.WilliamsL. A.SmithG.TreviranusJ.EaglesonR. (1999). Developing a video-mediated communication system for hospitalized children. Telemedicine Journal, 5, 193–208.
GibsonJ. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Oxford, UK: Psychology Press.
72.
Giraff Technologies AB. (2011). Giraff: Confidence for independent living. Retrieved from http://giraff.org/
73.
GkikasK.NathanaelD.MarmarasN. (2007). The evolution of FPS game controllers: How use progressively shaped their present design. In Proceedings of the 11th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics (pp. 37–46). Patras, Greece: New Technologies Publications.
74.
Goldin-MeadowS.KimS.SingerM. (1999). What the teacher’s hands tell the student’s mind about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 720.
75.
Gonzalez-JimenezJ.GalindoC.Ruiz-SarmientoJ. R. (2012). Technical improvements of the Giraff telepresence robot based on users’ evaluation. In RO-MAN (pp. 827–832). New York, NY: IEEE.
GrafB.ReiserU.HägeleM.MauzK.KleinP. (2009). Robotic home assistant Care-O-bot® 3-product vision and innovation platform. In Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (pp. 139–144). New York, NY: IEEE.
80.
GridleyC. M.RetikA. B.CilentoB.NguyenH. T. (2012, October20). In-home robots can effectively engage children and their parents in post-operative care, and allow for cost-efficient remote physician monitoring. In American Academy of Pediatrics National Conference and Exhibition. Session abstract Retrieved from https://aap.confex.com/aap/2012/webprogram/Paper17310.html
81.
GroomV.NassC. (2007). Can robots be teammates? Benchmarks in human robot teams. Interaction Studies, 8, 483–500.
GullbergM.HolmqvistK. (1999). Keeping an eye on gestures: Visual perception of gestures in face-to-face communication. Pragmatics & Cognition, 7(1), 35–63.
HanJ.KangB.ParkS.HongS. (2012). How to sustain long-term interaction between children and ROBOSEM in English class. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (pp. 421–422). New York, NY: ACM.
89.
HansenS. T.SvenstrupM.AndersenH. J.BakT. (2009). Adaptive human aware navigation based on motion pattern analysis. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 927–932). New York, NY: IEEE.
HenkelZ.MurphyR. R.BethelC. L. (2012). Towards a computational method of scaling a robot’s behavior via proxemics. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (pp. 145–146). New York, NY: ACM.
HineB.StokerC.SimsM.RasmussenD.HontalasP.FongT.. . . NygrenE. (1994, May). The application of telepresence and virtual reality to subsea exploration. In LeeM. J.McGeeR. B. (Eds.), Proceeding of the 2nd Workshop on Mobile Robots for Subsea Environments (pp. 117–126). Monterey, CA: International Advanced Robotics Programme.
96.
HoleG. J.GeorgeP. A.EavesK.RasekA. (2002). Effects of geometric distortions on face-recognition performance. PERCEPTION, 31(10), 1221–1240.
HusakM. (2003). Evolution Robotics unveils new ER2 personal robot to showcase the latest advancements to the Evolution Robotics Software Platform (ERSP) [Press release]. Retrieved from http://evo.stage.la.idealab.com/news/release/CPJ-V
IjsselsteijnW. A.de RidderH.FreemanJ.AvonsS. E. (2000). Presence: Concept, determinants, and measurement. In Electronic Imaging (pp. 520–529). Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics.
106.
IjsselsteijnW. A. (2005). History of telepresence. SchreerO.KauffP.SikoraT. (Eds.), 3D video communication: Algorithms, concepts and real-time systems in human centered communication (pp. 5–21). New York, NY: Wiley.
107.
InTouch Technologies. (2003a). InTouch Health and Rehabilitation Institute at Santa Barbara collaborate to evaluate world’s first mobile remote presence robot for healthcare [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.intouchhealth.com/pr1-15-03.html
108.
InTouch Technologies. (2003b). World’s first remote presence robot used by healthcare experts in elder care begins clinical testing [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.intouchhealth.com/pr2-24-03.html
IsaacsE. A.TangJ. C. (1994). What video can and cannot do for collaboration: A case study. Multimedia Systems, 2(2), 63–73.
120.
JalilS. B. A.OsburnB.HuangJ.BarleyM.MarkovichM.ArmorR. (2012). Avatars at a meeting. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the New Zealand Chapter of the ACM’s Special Interest Group on Human–Computer Interaction (pp. 84–87). New York, NY: ACM.
JouppiN. P.ThomasS. (2005). Telepresence systems with automatic preservation of user head height, local rotation, and remote translation. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 62–68). New York, NY: IEEE.
125.
JungS. M.ChoiD.KwonK.JeonJ. W. (2013). A sketch-based interface for remote robot control on an online video screen. In International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) (pp. 428–429). New York, NY: IEEE.
126.
KaberD. B.EndsleyM. R. (1997). Out-of-the-loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety. Process Safety Progress, 16, 126–131.
127.
KacE. (1998). Live from Mars. Leonardo, 31(1), 1–2.
128.
KanayamaY.HartmanB. (1989). Analysis of driving backward in an electric-powered wheelchair. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 12, 1265–1270.
129.
KantonenT.WoodwardC.KatzN. (2010). Mixed reality in virtual world teleconferencing. In Virtual Reality Conference (pp. 179–182). New York, NY: IEEE.
KendonA. (1992). The negotiation of context in face-to-face interaction. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, 11, 323.
134.
KeyesB.CaseyR.YancoH. A.MaxwellB. A.GeorgievY. (2006). Camera placement and multi-camera fusion for remote robot operation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics (pp. 22–24). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
135.
KeyesB.MicireM.DruryJ. L.YancoH. A. (2010). Improving human-robot interaction through interface evolution. In ChugoD. (Ed.), Human–robot interaction (pp. 183–202). Vukovar, Croatia: InTech.
136.
KimW. H.ParkJ. W.LeeW. H.ChungM. J. (2010). Hierarchical database based on feature parameters for various multimodal expression generation of robot. In IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO) (pp. 65–69). New York, NY: IEEE.
137.
KirbyR.SimmonsR.ForlizziJ. (2009). Companion: A constraint-optimizing method for person-acceptable navigation. In 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 607–612). New York, NY: IEEE.
KristofferssonA.CoradeschiS.LoutfiA. (2013). A review of mobile robotic telepresence. Advances in Human–Computer Interaction, 2013. (Article ID 902316)
142.
KristofferssonA.EklundhK. S.LoutfiA. (2013). Measuring the quality of interaction in mobile robotic telepresence: A pilot’s perspective. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(1), 89–101.
143.
KwonO. H.KooS. Y.KimY. G.KwonD. S. (2010). Telepresence robot system for English tutoring. In Proceedings from 6th IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (pp. 152–155). New York, NY: IEEE.
LaiF. (2008). Robotic Telestroke Program: Transforming stroke care. Proceedings from the Third Annual Remote Presence Clinical Innovations Forum. Endovascular Today Supplement, Current Concepts in Comprehensive Stroke Care, 11, 8–11.
147.
LapointeJ. F.SavardP.VinsonN. G. (2011). A comparative study of four input devices for desktop virtual walkthroughs. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2186–2191.
148.
LazewatskyD. A.SmartW. D. (2011). A panorama interface for telepresence robots. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (pp. 177–178). New York, NY: ACM.
149.
LeeK. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27–50.
150.
LeeK. M.YatesD.ClarkJ.SawyO. E. (2010). Value create of mobile services through telepresence: Designing mobile information and entertainment applications with presence in mind. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 19, 265–279.
151.
LeeM.ForlizziJ.RybskiP. E.CrabbeF.ChungW.FinkleJ.. . . KieslerS. (2009). The Snackbot: Documenting the design of a robot for long-term human–robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (pp. 7–14). New York, NY: ACM.
152.
LeeM. K.TakayamaL. (2011). “Now, I have a body”: Uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 33–42). New York, NY: ACM.
153.
LeeS.KimC.LeeJ.NohH.LeeK.LeeG. G. (2010,). Affective effects of speech-enabled robots for language learning. In Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) (pp. 145–150). New York, NY: IEEE.
LeighJ.RawlingsM.GiradoJ.DaweG.FangR.VerloA.. . . DeFantiT. A. (2000). AccessBot: An enabling technology for telepresence. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual INET Conference (pp. 100–104). Reston, VA: Internet Society (ISOC). Retrieved from http://www.isoc.org/inet2000/cdproceedings/5c/5c_2.htm
156.
LievinM.LuthonF. (2004). Nonlinear color space and spatiotemporal MRF for hierarchical segmentation of face features in video. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13, 63–71.
MaR.KaberD. B. (2006). Presence, workload and performance effects of synthetic environment design factors. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 64, 541–552.
164.
MacharetD. G.FlorencioD. A. (2012). A collaborative control system for telepresence robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 5105–5111). New York, NY: IEEE.
165.
MangiatS.GibsonJ. (2009). Automatic scene relighting for video conferencing. In 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) (pp. 2781–2784). New York, NY: IEEE.
MantovaniG.RivaG. (1999). “Real” presence: How different ontologies generate different criteria for presence, telepresence, and virtual presence. Presence, 8, 540–550.
MaybinJ. (2007). Lending a helping robotic hand. Assisted Living Consult, 3(5), 28–30.
171.
MessingerP. R.StrouliaE.LyonsK.BoneM.NiuR. H.SmirnovK.PerelgutS. (2009). Virtual worlds—past, present, and future: New directions in social computing. Decision Support Systems, 47, 204–228.
172.
MichalowskiM. P.SabanovicS.SimmonsR. (2006). A spatial model of engagement for a social robot. In 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control (pp. 762–767). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
173.
MichaudF.BoissyP.LabontéD.BrièreS.PerreaultK.CorriveauH.. . . LétourneauD. (2010). Exploratory design and evaluation of a homecare teleassistive mobile robotic system. Mechatronics, 20, 751–766.
174.
MicireM. J. (2008). Evolution and field performance of a rescue robot. Journal of Field Robotics, 25, 17–30.
MineM. R.BrooksF. P.Jr.SequinC. H. (1997). Moving objects in space: Exploiting proprioception in virtual-environment interaction. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (pp. 19–26). New York, NY: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley.
177.
MinskyM. (1980). Telepresence. Omni, 2(9), 45–52.
178.
MisawaK.IshiguroY.RekimotoJ. (2012). Livemask: A telepresence surrogate system with a face-shaped screen for supporting nonverbal communication. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 394–397). New York, NY: ACM.
179.
MizumotoT.NakadaiK.YoshidaT.TakedaR.OtsukaT.TakahashiT.OkunoH. G. (2011). Design and implementation of selectable sound separation on the Texai telepresence system using HARK. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 2130–2137). New York, NY: IEEE.
MuhlbachL.BockerM.PrussogA. (1995). Telepresence in videocommunications: A study on stereoscopy and individual eye contact. Human Factors, 37, 290–305.
183.
MutluB.ForlizziJ. (2008). Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human–robot interaction. In 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 287–294). New York, NY: IEEE.
NilssonM.WendtF. (2010). Virtual reality application user interface: Design and implementation of controls for navigation in a virtual reality application (Master’s thesis). Chalmers University of Technology and the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. Retrieved from http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/127172.pdf
NormanD. A. (1994). How might people interact with agents. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 68–71.
190.
NowakK. L.BioccaF. (2003). The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 12, 481–494.
191.
OlsonG. M.OlsonJ. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human–Computer Interaction, 15, 139–178.
PaepckeA.SotoB.TakayamaL.KoenigF.GassendB. (2011). Yelling in the hall: Using sidetone to address a problem with mobile remote presence systems. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 107–116). New York, NY: ACM.
194.
PangW.SeetG. (2012). Design considerations of a robotic head for telepresence applications. In Intelligent Robotics and Applications (pp. 131–140). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
195.
ParkJ. C.SongH.KooS.KimY. M.KwonD. S. (2010). Robot’s behavior expressions according to the sentence types and emotions with modification by personality. In IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO) (pp. 105–110). New York, NY: IEEE.
196.
ParkS. J.HanJ. H.KangB. H.ShinK. C. (2011). Teaching assistant robot, ROBOSEM, in English class and practical issues for its diffusion. In IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO) (pp. 8–11). New York, NY: IEEE.
PaulosE.CannyJ. (1998). PRoP: Personal roving presence. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 296–303). New York, NY: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley.
RaeI.TakayamaL.MutluB. (2013). The influence of height in robot-mediated communication. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM Human Robot Interaction Conference (pp. 1–8). New York, NY: IEEE.
202.
RapackiE. B.NiezreckiC.YancoH. A. (2009, November). An underactuated gripper to unlatch door knobs and handles. Paper presented at the Second Annual IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications, Woburn, MA.
RieckeB.BodenheimerB.McNamaraT.WilliamsB.PengP.FeuereissenD. (2010). Do we need to walk for effective virtual reality navigation? Physical rotations alonemaysuffice. Spatial Cognition, 7, 234–247.
209.
RiekL. D. (2007). Realizing Hinokio: Candidate requirements for physical avatar systems. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 303–308). New York, NY: ACM.
210.
RileyJ. M.KaberD. B. (1998). The effects of visual display type and navigational aid on performance, presence, and workload in virtual reality training of telerover navigation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (1251–1255). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
211.
RileyJ. M.KaberD. B.DraperJ. V. (2004). Situation awareness and attention allocation measures for quantifying telepresence experiences in teleoperation. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 14(1), 51–67.
212.
RinconF.VibbertM.ChildsV.FryR.CaliguriD.UrtechoJ.. . . JalloJ. (2012). Implementation of a model of robotic tele-presence (RTP) in the Neuro-ICU: Effect on critical care nursing team satisfaction. Neurocritical Care, 17(1), 97–101.
213.
RivaG.DavideF.IjsselsteijnW. A. (2003). The experience of presence in mediated environments. Being there: Concepts, effects, and measurements of user presence in synthetic environments (pp. 3–16). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
RothenbergS. S.YoderS.KayS.PonskyT. (2009). Initial experience with surgical telementoring in pediatric laparoscopic surgery using remote presence technology. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 19(S1), 219–222.
218.
RydenT. (2011, April). Practical applications for telepresence robots. Keynote address at IEEE Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications (TePRA), Woburn, MA.
SalasE.CookeN. J.RosenM. A. (2008). On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Human Factors, 50, 540–547.
221.
SandersT.OlesonK. E.BillingsD. R.ChenJ. Y.HancockP. A. (2011, September). A model of human–robot trust theoretical model development. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 55th Annual Meeting (pp. 1432–1436). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
222.
SatakeS.KandaT.GlasD. F.ImaiM.IshiguroH.HagitaN. (2009). How to approach humans? Strategies for social robots to initiate interaction. In 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI), (pp. 109–116). New York, NY: IEEE.
223.
SchaeferK. E.SandersT. L.YordonR. E.BillingsD. R.HancockP. A. (2012). Classification of robot form: Factors predicting perceived trustworthiness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting (pp. 1548–1552). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
224.
SchloerbD. W. (1995). A quantitative measure of telepresence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 4(1), 64–80.
225.
SchubertT. W.FriedmannF.RegenbrechtH. T. (1999, April). Decomposing the sense of presence: Factor analytic insights. Paper presented at the 2nd International Workshop on Presence, Colchester, UK.
226.
SchuemieM. J.van der StraatenP.KrijnM.van der MastC. A. (2001). Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 183–201.
227.
SchulzD.BurgardW.FoxD.ThrunS.CremersA. B. (2000). Web interfaces for mobile robots in public places. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 7(1), 48–56.
228.
SheehyK.GreenA. A. (2011). Beaming children where they cannot go: Telepresence robots and inclusive education: An exploratory study. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 3, 135–146.
229.
Sheik-NainarM. A.KaberD. B.ChowM. Y. (2004). Control gain adaptation in virtual reality mediated human–telerobot interaction. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 15, 259–274.
230.
SheridanT. (1992). Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence, 1(1), 120–126.
231.
ShiC.YuK.LiJ.LiS. (2004). Automatic image quality improvement for videoconferencing. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 701–704). New York, NY: IEEE.
232.
ShneidermanB. (1993). Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages. In Sparks of Innovation in Human–Computer Interaction (pp. 17–38). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
233.
SimmonsR.SmithT.DiasM. B.GoldbergD.HershbergerD.StentzA.ZlotR. (2002). A layered architecture for coordination of mobile robots. In SchultzA. C.ParkerL. E. (Eds.), Multi-robot systems: From swarms to intelligent automata (Vol. 1, pp. 103–112). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
SingerP. W. (2009). Robotics revolution and conflict in the 21st century. New York, NY: Penguin.
240.
SinhaP.BalasB.OstrovskyY.RussellR. (2006). Face recognition by humans: Nineteen results all computer vision researchers should know about. Proceedings of the IEEE, 94(11), 1948–1962.
241.
SirkinD.VenoliaG.TangJ.RobertsonG.KimT.InkpenK.. . . SinclairM. (2011). Motion and attention in a kinetic videoconferencing proxy. Human–Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2011 (pp. 162–180). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
242.
SisbotE. A.AlamiR.SiméonT.DautenhahnK.WaltersM.WoodsS. (2005). Navigation in the presence of humans. In 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (pp. 181–188). New York, NY: IEEE.
243.
SisbotE. A.Marin-UriasL. F.AlamiR.SimeonT. (2007). A human aware mobile robot motion planner. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23, 874–883.
SlaterM.UsohM.SteedA. (1994). Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 3, 130–144.
246.
SlaterM.WilburS. (1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6, 603–616.
SmithC. D.SkandalakisJ. E. (2005). Remote presence proctoring by using a wireless remote-control videoconferencing system. Surgical Innovation, 12, 139–143.
StanneyK. M.MollaghasemiM.ReevesL.BreauxR.GraeberD. A. (2003). Usability engineering of virtual environments (VEs): Identifying multiple criteria that drive effective VE system design. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 58, 447–481.
SucherJ. F.ToddS. R.JonesS. L.ThrockmortonT.TurnerK. L.MooreF. A. (2011). Robotic telepresence: A helpful adjunct that is viewed favorably by critically ill surgical patients. American Journal of Surgery, 202, 843–847.
SunM.LiuZ.QiuJ.ZhangZ.SinclairM. (2009). Active lighting for video conferencing. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 19, 1819–1829.
259.
TakayamaL. (2011). Toward making robots invisible-in-use. In DautenhahnK.SaundersJ. (Eds.), New frontiers in human–robot interaction (pp. 111–132). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
260.
TakayamaL.GoJ. (2012). Mixing metaphors in mobile remote presence. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 495–504). New York, NY: ACM.
261.
TakayamaL.HarrisH. (2013, March). Presentation of (telepresent) self: On the double-edged effects of mirrors. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 381–388). New York, NY: IEEE.
262.
TakayamaL.Marder-EppsteinE.HarrisH.BeerJ. M. (2011). Assisted driving of a mobile remote presence system: System design and controlled user evaluation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 1883–1889). New York, NY: IEEE.
ToppE. A.ChristensenH. I. (2005). Tracking for following and passing persons. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 2321–2327). New York, NY: IEEE.
268.
TrahaniasP.ArgyrosA.TsakirisD.CremersA.SchulzD.BurgardW.. . . KatselakiA. (2000). Tourbot: Interactive museum tele-presence through robotic avatars. In Proceedings of the 9th International World Wide Web Conference. New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
269.
TsaiT. C.HsuY. L.MaA. I.KingT.WuC. H. (2007). Developing a telepresence robot for interpersonal communication with the elderly in a home environment. Telemedicine and e-Health, 13, 407–424.
270.
TsuiK. M.DesaiM.YancoH. A. (2010). Considering the bystander’s perspective for indirect human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (pp. 129–130). New York, NY: IEEE.
271.
TsuiK. M.DesaiM.YancoH. A. (2012). Towards measuring the quality of interaction: Communication through telepresence robots. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems (pp. 101–108). New York, NY: ACM.
272.
TsuiK. M.DesaiM.YancoH. A.UhlikC. (2011a). Exploring use cases for telepresence robots. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2011 (pp. 11–18). New York, NY: IEEE.
van der SchaarM.LinY. T. (2001). Content-based selective enhancement for streaming video. In Proceedings International Conference on Image Processing (pp. 977–980). New York, NY: IEEE.
279.
VenkateshV.BrownS. A. (2001). A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25, 71–102.
280.
VenoliaG.TangJ.CervantesR.BlyS.RobertsonG.LeeB.InkpenK. (2010). Embodied social proxy: Mediating interpersonal connection in hub-and-satellite teams. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1049–1058). New York, NY: ACM.
VespaP. M.MillerC.HuX.NenovV.BuxeyF.MartinN. A. (2007). Intensive care unit robotic telepresence facilitates rapid physician response to unstable patients and decreased cost in neurointensive care. Surgical Neurology, 67, 331–337.
283.
VGo Communications. (2011a). Introducing VGo: From anywhere. Go anywhere. Retrieved from http://vgocom.com/
284.
VGo Communications. (2011b). Supercharging distributed project teams [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.vgocom.com
VoshellM.WoodsD. D.PhillipsF. (2005). Overcoming the keyhole in human–robot coordination: Simulation and evaluation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting (pp. 442–446). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
WangC.BrandsteinM. S. (1998). A hybrid real-time face tracking system. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (Vol. 6, pp. 3737–3740). New York, NY: IEEE.
290.
WangL.HuW.TanT. (2003). Recent developments in human motion analysis. Pattern Recognition, 36, 585–601.
WoodsS.DautenhahnK.SchulzJ. (2004). The design space of robots: Investigating children’s views. In Proceedings of 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 47–52). New York, NY: IEEE.
300.
WoonB. (2013, May6). Polycom helps healthcare organizations reduce unnecessary rehospitalizations, supports prevention and wellness with new video collaboration solutions for robotics, mobile devices and web browsers [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.polycom.com/company/news/press-releases/2013/20130506_2.html
YancoH. A.DruryJ. L.ScholtzJ. (2004). Beyond usability evaluation: Analysis of human–robot interaction at a major robotics competition. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 19, 117–149.
303.
YancoH. A.KeyesB.DruryJ. L.NielsenC. W.FewD. A.BruemmerD. J. (2007). Evolving interface design for robot search tasks. Journal of Field Robotics, 24, 779–799.
304.
YeeN.EllisJ.DucheneautN. (2008). The tyranny of embodiment. Artifact, 2(2), 88–93.
305.
YeungJ.FelsD. I. (2005, May). A remote telepresence system for high school classrooms. In Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (pp. 1465–1468). New York, NY: IEEE.
306.
YoritaA.KubotaN. (2012). Mutual learning for second language education and language acquisition of robots. In RückertU.JoaquinS.FelixW. (Eds.), Advances in autonomous mini robots: Proceedings of the 6th AMiRE Symposium (pp. 75–87). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
307.
YunS.ShinJ.KimD., C. G.KimM.ChoiM. T. (2011). Engkey: Tele-education robot. In MutluB.BartneckC.HamJ.EversV.KandaT. (Eds.), Social robotics (pp. 142–152). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
308.
ZahorikP.JenisonR. L. (1998). Presence as being-in-the-world. Presence, 7(1), 78–89.
309.
ZhaiS.MilgramP. (1992). Human–robot synergism and virtual telerobotic control. In The economics of ergonomics: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Association of Canada (pp. 201–206). Mississauga, Canada: Human Factors Association of Canada.
310.
ZhaoY.GeorganasN. D.PetriuE. M. (2010). Applying contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization and integral projection for facial feature enhancement and detection. In Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) (pp. 861–866). New York: IEEE.
