Modern vehicle cockpits have begun to incorporate a number of information-rich techno-logies, including systems to enhance and improve driving and navigation performance and also driving-irrelevant information systems. The visually intensive nature of the driving task requires these systems to adopt primarily nonvisual means of information display, and the auditory modality represents an obvious alternative to vision for interacting with in-vehicle technologies (IVTs). Although the literature on auditory displays has grown tremendously in recent decades, to date, few guidelines or recommendations exist to aid in the design of effective auditory displays for IVTs. This chapter provides an overview of the current state of research and practice with auditory displays for IVTs. The role of basic auditory capabilities and limitations as they relate to in-vehicle auditory display design are discussed. Extant systems and prototypes are reviewed, and when possible, design recommendations are made. Finally, research needs and an iterative design process to meet those needs are discussed.
AbelS. M.KreverE. M.AlbertiP. W. (1990). Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners. Scandinavian Audiology, 19, 43–54.
2.
AdellE.VarhelyiA.HjalmdahlM. (2008). Auditory and haptic systems for in-car speed management: A comparative real life study. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 11, 445–458.
3.
AhlstromV. (2003). An initial survey of National Airspace System auditory alarm issues in terminal air traffic control (Tech. Rep. No. DOT/FAA/CT-TN03/10). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
4.
AikenE. G.LauA. W. (1966). Memory for the pitch of a tone. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 231–233.
5.
AikenE. G.ShennumW. A.ThomasG. S. (1974). Memory processes in the identification of pitch. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 449–452.
6.
AlainC.OgawaK. H.WoodsD. L. (1996). Aging and the segregation of auditory stimulus sequences. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 51, P91–P93.
7.
AntinJ. F.LaurettaD. J.WolfL. D. (1991). The intensity of auditory warning tones in the automobile environment: detection and preference evaluations. Applied Ergonomics, 22, 13–19.
8.
AuerbachC. (1971). Improvement of frequency discrimination with practice: An attentional model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 316–335.
9.
BaldwinC. L. (2002). Designing in-vehicle technologies for older drivers: Application of sensory-cognitive interaction theory. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 307–329.
10.
BaldwinC. L.MayJ. F. (2006). Auditory CASs reduce crash potential in older drivers. In Proceedings of the International Ergonomics AssociationMaastrich, Netherlands.
11.
BallasJ. A. (1993). Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 250–267.
12.
BaronJ.SwieckiB.ChenY. (2006). Vehicle technology trends in the electronics for the North American market: Opportunities for the Taiwanese automotive industry. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Automotive Research.
13.
BelzS.RobinsonG.CasaliJ. (1999). A new class of auditory warning signals for complex systems: Auditory icons. Human Factors, 41, 608–618.
14.
BlattnerM. M.SumikawaD. A.GreenbergR. M. (1989). Earcons and icons: Their structure and common design principles. Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 11–44.
15.
BoltzM. G. (1998). Tempo discrimination of musical patterns: Effects due to pitch and rhythmic structure. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1357–1373.
16.
BonebrightT. L.NeesM. A. (2007). Memory for auditory icons and earcons with localization cues. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Meeting of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2007) (pp. 419–422). Montreal, Canada: McGill University, Schulich School of Music.
17.
BonebrightT. L.NeesM. A. (2009). Most earcons do not interfere with spoken passage comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 431–445.
18.
BonebrightT. L.NeesM. A.ConnerleyT. T.McCainG. R. (2001). Testing the effectiveness of sonified graphs for education: A programmatic research project. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD01) (pp. 62–66). Espoo, Finland: Laboratory of Acoustics and Audio Signal Processing and the Telecommunications Software and Multimedia Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology.
19.
BonnelA.-M.HafterE. R. (1998). Divided attention between simultaneous auditory and visual signals. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 179–190.
20.
BregmanA. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
BrewsterS. (1994). Providing a structured method for integrating non-speech audio into human-computer interfaces (Unpublished dissertation). University of York, York, UK.
22.
BrewsterS. (1997). Using non-speech sound to overcome information overload. Displays, 17, 179–189.
23.
BrewsterS. (1998). Using nonspeech sounds to provide navigation cues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 5, 224–259.
24.
BrewsterS.CreaseM. G. (1999). Correcting menu usability problems with sound. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18, 165–177.
25.
BrewsterS.MurrayR. (2000). Presenting dynamic information on mobile computers. Personal Technologies, 4, 209–212.
26.
BrewsterS.WrightP. C.EdwardD. E. (1994). The design and evaluation of an auditory enhanced scrollbar. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 94) (pp. 173–179). New York, NY: ACM Press.
27.
BrooksC.RakotonirainyA. (2007). In-vehicle technologies, advanced driver assistance systems and driver distraction: Research challenges. In FaulksI. J.ReganM.StevensonJ.BrownJ.PorterA.IrwinJ. D. (Eds.), Distracted driving (pp. 471–486). Sydney, Australia: Australasian College of Road Safety.
28.
BrooksC.RakotonirainyA.MaireF. D. (2005). Reducing driver distraction through software. In Proceedings of the Australasian Road Safety Research Policing Education Conference. Retrieved from http://www.rsconference.com/roadsafety/detail/503
29.
BrownL. M.BrewsterS. A.RamlollR.BurtonM.RiedelB. (2003). Design guidelines for audio presentation of graphs and tables. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD03) (pp. 284–287). Boston, MA: Boston University Publications Production Department.
30.
BurnettG. E. (2000). Usable vehicle navigation systems: Are we there yet?In Proceedings of the Vehicle Electronic Systems 2000 (pp. 3.1.1–3.1.11). Stratford upon Avon, UK: ERA Technology.
31.
BurnsP. C.LansdownT. C. (2000). E-Distraction: The challenges for safe and usable internet services in vehicles. In Proceedings of the Internet Forum on the Safety Impact of Driver Distraction When Using In-Vehicle Technologies [Internet forum].
32.
BurtJ. L.BartolomeD. S.BurdetteD. W.ComstockJ. R. (1995). A psychophysiological evaluation of the perceived urgency of auditory warning signals. Ergonomics, 38, 2327–2340.
33.
BuxtonW. (1989). Introduction to this special issue on nonspeech audio. Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 1–9.
34.
BuxtonW.BlyS. A.FrysingerS. P.LunneyD.MansurD. L.MezrichJ. J.MorrisonR. C. (1985). Communicating with sound. In Proceedings of the CHI ’85 (pp. 115–119). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
35.
CampbellJ. L.RichardC. M.BrownJ. L.McCallumM. (2007). Crash warning system interfaces: Human factors insights and lessons learned (Tech. Rep. No. HS 810 687). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
36.
CarstenO.TateF. (2001). Intelligent speed adaptation: The best collision avoidance system (Paper 324). Leeds, UK: University of Leeds, Institute for Transport Studies.
37.
ChildsE. (2005). Auditory graphs of real-time data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2005) (pp. 402–405). Limerick, Ireland: ICAD.
38.
CowanN. (1984). On short and long auditory stores. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 341–370.
39.
CummingsM. L.KilgoreR. M.WangE.TijerinaL.KochharD. S. (2007). Effects of single versus multiple warnings on driver performance. Human Factors, 49, 1097–1106.
40.
CusackR.RobertsB. (2000). Effects of differences in timbre on sequential grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1112–1120.
41.
DavidseR. J.HagenziekerM. P.van WolffelaarP. C.BrouwerW. H. (2009). Effects of in-car support on mental workload and driving performance of older drivers. Human Factors, 51, 363–476.
42.
de CampoA. (2007). Toward a data sonification design space map. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD07) (pp. 342–347). Montreal, Canada: McGill University, Schulich School of Music.
43.
Dell’AcquaR.JolicouerP. (2000). Visual encoding of patterns is subject to dual-task interference. Memory & Cognition, 28, 184–191.
44.
DeutschD. (1970). Tones and numbers: Specificity of interference in immediate memory. Science, 168, 1604–1605.
45.
Di StasiL. L.ContrerasD.CanasJ. J.CandidoA.MaldonadoA.CatenaA. (2010). The consequences of unexpected emotional sounds on driving behaviour in risky situations. Safety Science, 48, 1463–1468.
46.
DinglerT.LindsayJ.WalkerB. N. (2008). Learnability of sound cues for environmental features: Auditory icons, earcons spearcons, and speech. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2008). Paris, France: IRCAM.
47.
DonmezB.BoyleL. N.LeeJ. D. (2007). Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39, 581–590.
48.
DonmezB.CummingsM. L.GrahamH. D. (2009). Auditory decision aiding in supervisory control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles. Human Factors, 51, 718–729.
49.
DrewsF. A.PasupathiM.StrayerD. L. (2008). Passenger and cell phone conversations in simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 392–400.
50.
DrewsF. A.YazdaniH.GodfreyC. N.CooperJ. M.StrayerD. L. (2009). Text messaging during simulated driving. Human Factors, 51, 762–770.
51.
Driver Focus-Telematics Working Group. (2002). Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in-vehicle information and communication systems. Washington, DC: Automotive Alliance.
52.
DurlachN. I.MasonC. R.KiddG.ArbogastT. L.ColburnH. S.Shinn-CunninghamB. (2003). Note on informational masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 2984–2987.
53.
EdworthyJ. (1998). Does sound help us to work better with machines? A commentary on Rautenberg’s paper “About the Importance of Auditory Alarms During the Operation of a Plant Simulator.”Interacting With Computers, 10, 401–409.
54.
EdworthyJ.HellierE. (2000). Auditory warnings in noisy environments. 2000, 2(6), 27–39.
55.
EdworthyJ.HellierE. (2005). Fewer but better auditory alarms will improve patient safety. British Medical Journal, 14, 212–215.
56.
EdworthyJ.HellierE. (2006a). Alarms and human behaviour: Implications for medical alarms. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 97, 12–17.
57.
EdworthyJ.HellierE. (2006b). Complex nonverbal auditory signals and speech warnings. In WogalterM. S. (Ed.), Handbook of warnings (pp. 199–220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
EdworthyJ.HellierE. J.AldrichK.LoxleyS. (2004). Designing trend-monitoring sounds for helicopters: Methodological issues and an application. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 203–218.
59.
EndsleyM. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.
60.
EricsonM. A.BrungartD. S.SimpsonB. D. (2003). Factors that influence intelligibility in multitalker speech displays. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14, 313–334.
61.
FlowersJ. H. (2005). Thirteen years of reflection on auditory graphing: Promises, pitfalls, and potential new directions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2005) (pp. 406–409). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychfacpub/430/
62.
FlowersJ. H.BuhmanD. C.TurnageK. D. (1997). Cross-modal equivalence of visual and auditory scatterplots for exploring bivariate data samples. Human Factors, 39, 341–351.
63.
FlowersJ. H.BuhmanD. C.TurnageK. D. (2005). Data sonification from the desktop: Should sound be part of standard data analysis software?ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2, 467–472.
64.
FlowersJ. H.HauerT. A. (1992). The ear’s versus the eye’s potential to assess characteristics of numeric data: Are we too visuocentric?Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 24, 258–264.
65.
FlowersJ. H.HauerT. A. (1993). “Sound” alternatives to visual graphics for exploratory data analysis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 25, 242–249.
66.
FlowersJ. H.HauerT. A. (1995). Musical versus visual graphs: Cross-modal equivalence in perception of time series data. Human Factors, 37, 553–569.
67.
FrauenbergerC.StockmanT. (2006). Patterns in auditory menu design. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD06) (pp. 141–147). London, UK: Department of Computer Science, Queen Mary, University of London.
68.
GaverW. W. (1989). The SonicFinder: An interface that uses auditory icons. Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 67–94.
69.
GaverW. W. (1993). What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology, 5, 1–29.
70.
GaverW. W. (1994). Using and creating auditory icons. In KramerG. (Ed.), Auditory display: Sonification, audification, and auditory interfaces (pp. 417–446). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
71.
GelfandS. A. (2009). Essentials of audiology. New York, NY: Thieme Medical.
72.
GiguereC.LarocheC.Al OsmanR.ZhengY. (2008). Optimal installation of audible warning systems in the noisy workplace. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN) (pp. 197–204). Dortmund, Germany: IfADo.
73.
GrahamR. (1999). Use of auditory icons as emergency warnings: Evaluation within a vehicle collision avoidance application. Ergonomics, 42, 1233–1248.
74.
GuillaumeA.PellieuxL.ChastresV.DrakeC. (2003). Judging the urgency of nonvocal auditory warning signals: Perceptual and cognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 196–212.
75.
HaasE. C. (1998). Can 3-D auditory warnings enhance helicopter cockpit safety?In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 1117–1121). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
76.
HaasE. C.EdworthyJ. (1996). Designing urgency into auditory warnings using pitch, speed, and loudness. Computing & Control Engineering Journal, 7, 193–198.
77.
HalpernA. R. (1988). Mental scanning in auditory imagery for songs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 434–443.
78.
HalpernA. R. (1989). Memory for the absolute pitch of familiar songs. Memory & Cognition, 17, 572–581.
79.
HancockP. A.SimmonsL.HashemiL.HowarthH.RanneyT. (1999). The effects of in-vehicle distraction on driver response during a crucial driving maneuver. Transportation Human Factors, 1, 295–309.
80.
HartS. G. (2006). NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting (pp. 904–908). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
81.
HartS. G.StavelandL. E. (1988). Development of the NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In HancockP. A.MeshkatiN. (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 239–250). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland Press.
82.
HatfieldJ.ChamberlainT. (2008). The effect of audio materials from a rear-seat audiovisual entertainment system or from radio on simulated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 11, 52–60.
83.
HeitmannA.GuttkuhnR.AguirreA.TrutschelU.Moore-EdeM. (2001). Technologies for the monitoring and prevention of driver fatigue. In Proceedings of the First International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 81–86). Iowa City: University of Iowa, Public Policy Center.
84.
HerefordJ.WinnW. (1994). Non-speech sound in human-computer interaction: A review and design guidelines. Journal of Educational Computer Research, 11, 211–233.
85.
HoC.SpenceC. (2005). Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver’s visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 157–174.
86.
HoC.SpenceC. (2009). Using peripersonal warning signals to orient a driver’s gaze. Human Factors, 51, 539–557.
87.
HorberryT.AndersonJ.ReganM. A.TriggsT. J.BrownJ. (2006). Driver distraction: The effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38, 185–191.
88.
HoskingS. G.YoungK. L.ReganM. A. (2009). The effects of text messaging on young drivers. Human Factors, 51, 582–592.
89.
JamsonA. H.WestermanS. J.HockeyG. R. J.CarstenO. M. J. (2004). Speech-based e-mail and driver behavior: Effects of an in-vehicle message system interface. Human Factors, 46, 625–639.
90.
JennessJ. W.LernerN. D.MazorS.OsbergJ. S.TefftB. C. (2008). Use of advanced in-vehicle technology by younger and older early adopters. Survey results on adaptive cruise control systems (Tech. Rep. No. DOT HS 810 917). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
91.
JeonJ. Y.FrickeF. R. (1997). Duration of perceived and performed sounds. Psychology of Music, 25, 70–83.
92.
JeonM. (2010, June). Two or three things you need to know about AUI design or designers. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2010), Washington, DC.
93.
JeonM.DavisonB.NeesM. A.WilsonJ.WalkerB. N. (2009). Enhanced auditory menu cues improve dual task performance and are preferred with in-vehicle technologies. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Automotive UI 2009) (pp. 91–98). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
94.
JeonM.WalkerB. N. (in press). Spindex (speech index) improves auditory menu acceptance and navigation performance. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing.
95.
KahnemanD. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
96.
KellerP.StevensC. (2004). Meaning from environmental sounds: Types of signal-referent relations and their effect on recognizing auditory icons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 3–12.
97.
KlaussS. G.DingusT. A.NealeV. L.SudweeksJ. D.RamseyD. J. (2006). The impact of driver inattention on near crash/crash risk: An analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data (Tech. Rep. No. DOT HS 810 594). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
98.
KramerG. (1994). An introduction to auditory display. In KramerG. (Ed.), Auditory display: Sonification, audification, and auditory interfaces (pp. 1–78). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
99.
KramerG.WalkerB. N.BonebrightT. L.CookP.FlowersJ.MinerN.NeuhoffJ.BargarR.BarrassS.BergerJ.EvreinovG.FitchW. T.GröhnM.HandelS.KaperH.LevkowitzH.LodhaS.Shinn-CunninghamB.SimoniM.TipeiS. (1999). The sonification report: Status of the field and research agenda. Report prepared for the National Science Foundation by members of the International Community for Auditory Display. Santa Fe, NM: International Community for Auditory Display.
100.
KuboseT. T.BockK.DellG. S.GarnseyS. M.KramerA. F.MayhughJ. (2005). The effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 43–63.
101.
KunA. L.PaekT.MedenicaZ.MemarovicN.PalinkoO. (2009). Glancing at personal navigation devices can affect driving: Experimental results and design implications. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Automotive UI 2009) (pp. 129–136). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
102.
LacherezP.SeahE. L.SandersonP. M. (2007). Overlapping melodic alarms are almost indiscriminable. Human Factors, 49, 637–645.
103.
LeeJ. D.CavenB.HaakeS.BrownT. L. (2001). Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computers: The effect of speech-based e-mail on drivers’ attention to the roadway. Human Factors, 43, 631–640.
104.
LeeJ. D.McGeheeD. V.BrownT. L.ReyesM. L. (2002). Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Human Factors, 44, 314–334.
105.
LeeY. C.LeeJ. D.Ng BoyleL. (2009). The interaction of cognitive load and attention-directing cues in driving. Human Factors, 51, 271–280.
106.
LeeY. L. (2010). The effect of congruency between sound-source location and semantics of in-vehicle navigation systems. Safety Science, 48, 708–713.
107.
LeplatreG.McGregorI. (2004). How to tackle auditory interface aesthetics? Discussion and case study. In Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the International Conference on Auditory Display. Sydney, Australia: ICAD. Retrieved from http://www.icad.org/Proceedings/2004/LeplaitreMcGregor2004.pdf
108.
LernerN.SingerJ.HueyR. (2008). Driver strategies for engaging in distracting tasks using in-vehicle technologies (Report No. HS DOT 810 919). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
109.
LeshowitzB.CudahyE. (1973). Frequency discrimination in the presence of another tone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 882–887.
110.
LetowskiT.KarshR.VauseN.ShillingR. D.BallasJ.BrungartD.McKinleyR. (2001). Human factors military lexicon: Auditory displays (Tech. Rep. No. ARL-TR-2526). Aberdeen, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
111.
LinC. T.ChiuT. T.HuangT. Y.ChaoC. F.LiangW. C.HsuS. H.KoL. W. (2009). Assessing effectiveness of various auditory warning signals in maintaining drivers’ attention in virtual reality-based driving environments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108, 825–835.
112.
LisettiC.NasozF. (2005). Affective intelligent car interfaces with emotion recognition. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Las Vegas, NV.
113.
LiuY.-C. (2001). Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers’ performance in advanced traveller information systems. Ergonomics, 44, 425–442.
114.
LlanerasR. E.SingerJ. P. (2002). In-vehicle navigation systems: Interface characteristics and industry trends. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (pp. 52–58). Iowa City: University of Iowa, Public Policy Center.
115.
LoebR. G.FitchW. (2002). A laboratory evaluation of an auditory display designed to enhance intraoperative monitoring. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 94, 362–368.
MarshallD. C.LeeJ. D.AustriaP. A. (2007). Alerts for in-vehicle information systems: Annoyance, urgency, and appropriateness. Human Factors, 49, 145–157.
118.
McAdamsS.BigandE. (1993). Thinking in sound: The cognitive psychology of human audition. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
119.
McCarleyJ. S.VaisM. J.PringleH.KramerA. F.IrwinD. E.StrayerD. L. (2004). Conversation disrupts change detection in complex traffic scenes. Human Factors, 46, 424–436.
120.
McDonaldJ. J.Teder-SalejarviW. A.HillyardS. A. (2000). Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception. Nature, 407, 906–908.
121.
McGookinD. K.BrewsterS. A. (2004). Understanding concurrent earcons: Applying auditory scene analysis principles to concurrent earcon recognition. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 1, 130–150.
122.
McKeownD.IsherwoodS. (2007). Mapping candidate within-vehicle auditory displays to their referents. Human Factors, 49, 417–428.
123.
McKeownD.IsherwoodS.ConwayG. (2010). Auditory displays as occasion setters. Human Factors, 52, 54–62.
124.
McLeodP. (1977). A dual task response modality effect: Support for multiprocessor models of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 651–667.
125.
MeratN.JamsonA. H. (2008). The effect of stimulus modality on signal detection: Implications for assessing the safety of in-vehicle technology. Human Factors, 50, 145–158.
126.
MillerG. A. (1947). The masking of speech. Psychology Bulletin, 44, 105–129.
127.
MohebbiR.GrayR.TanH. Z. (2009). Driver reaction time to tactile and auditory rear-end collision warnings while talking on a cell phone. Human Factors, 51, 102–110.
128.
MondorT. A.BregmanA. S. (1994). Allocating attention to frequency regions. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 268–276.
129.
MondorT. A.ZatorreR. J.TerrioN. A. (1998). Constraints on the selection of auditory information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 66–79.
130.
MorleyS.PetrieH.O’NeillA.-M.McNallyP. (1999). Auditory navigation in hyperspace: Design and evaluation of a non-visual hypermedia system for blind users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18, 18–26.
131.
MulliganB. E.McBrideD. K.GoodmanL. S. (1985). A design guide for nonspeech auditory displays (Special Report No. 84-1). Pensacola, FL: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.
132.
NakamuraK.KawashimaR.SugiuraM.KatoT.NakamuraA.HatanoK.KojimaS. (2001). Neural substrates for recognition of familiar voices: A PET study. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1047–1054.
133.
NavarroJ.MarsF.HocJ. M. (2007). Lateral control assistance for car drivers: A comparison of motor priming and warning systems. Human Factors, 49, 950–960.
134.
NavonD. (1984). Resources: A theoretical soup stone?Psychological Review, 91, 216–234.
135.
NeesM. A.WalkerB. N. (2008a). Data density and trend reversals in auditory graphs: Effects on point estimation and trend identification tasks. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 5, Article 13.
136.
NeesM. A.WalkerB. N. (2008b). Encoding and representation of information in auditory graphs: Descriptive reports of listener strategies for understanding data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 08). Paris, France: IRCAM.
137.
NeesM. A.WalkerB. N. (2009). Auditory interfaces and sonification. In StephanidisC. (Ed.), The universal access handbook (pp. 32.1–32.15). New York, NY: CRC Press.
138.
NeisserU. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York, NY: Meredith.
NunesL.RecarteM. A. (2002). Cognitive demands of hands-free-phone conversation while driving. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 5, 133–144.
141.
PalladinoD.WalkerB. N. (2007). Learning rates for auditory menus enhanced with spearcons versus earcons. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD07) (pp. 274–279). Montreal, Canada: McGill University, Schulich School of Music.
142.
PalladinoD.WalkerB. N. (2008). Navigation efficiency of two dimensional auditory menus using spearcon enhancements. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting (pp. 1262–1266). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Engineering Society.
PattersonR. D. (1990). Auditory warning sounds in the work environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B327, 485–494.
145.
PerryN. C.StevensC. J.WigginsM. W.HowellC. E. (2007). Cough once for danger: Abstract warnings as informative alerts in civil aviation. Human Factors, 49, 1061–1071.
146.
PeryerG.NoyesJ. M.Pleydell-PearceC. W.LievenN. J. A. (2010). Auditory alerts: An intelligent alert presentation system for civil aircraft. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 20, 183–196.
147.
PringL.WalkerJ. (1994). The effects of unvocalized music on short-term memory. Current Psychology, 13, 165–171.
148.
RakauskasM. E.GugertyL. J.WardN. J. (2004). Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance. Journal of Safety Research, 35, 453–464.
149.
ReaganI.BaldwinC. L. (2006). Facilitating route memory with auditory route guidance systems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 146–155.
150.
RenchM. E. (2000). Auditory workload assessment, Volume I: Final report (Report No. HSIAC-RA-2000-004). Human Systems IAC report prepared for Human Research and Engineering Directorate. Aberdeen, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
151.
RossingT. D. (1982). The science of sound. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
152.
SalameP.BaddeleyA. D. (1987). Noise, unattended speech, and short-term memory. Ergonomics, 30, 1185–1194.
153.
SalameP.BaddeleyA. D. (1989). Effects of background music on phonological short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 41, 107–122.
154.
SandersonP. M. (2006). The multimodal world of medical monitoring displays. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 501–512.
155.
SandersonP. M.WeeA.LacherezP. (2006). Learnability and discriminability of melodic medical equipment alarms. Anaesthesia, 61, 142–147.
156.
SayginA. P.DickF.BatesE. (2005). An on-line task for contrasting auditory processing in the verbal and nonverbal domains and norms for younger and older adults. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 99–110.
157.
SchellenbergE. G.TrehubS. E. (2003). Good pitch memory is widespread. Psychological Science, 14, 262–266.
158.
SchneiderB. A.HamstraS. J. (1999). Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 371–380.
159.
ScottJ. J.GrayR. (2008). A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving. Human Factors, 50, 264–275.
160.
SeagullF. J.XiaoY.MackenzieC. F.WickensC. D. (2000). Auditory alarms: From alerting to informing. In Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress (Vol. 1, pp. 223–226).
161.
ShinarD.TractinskyN. (2004). Effects of practice on interference from an auditory task while driving: A simulation study (Tech. Rep. No. DOT HS 809 826). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
162.
SmithD. R.WalkerB. N. (2005). Effects of auditory context cues and training on performance of a point estimation sonification task. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1065–1087.
163.
SmithS. E.StephanK. L.ParkerS. P. A. (2004). Auditory warnings in the military cockpit: A preliminary evaluation of potential sound types (Tech. Rep. No. DSTO-TR-1615). Edinburgh, South Australia: Australian Government Department of Defence, Defence Science and Technology Organisation.
164.
SodnikJ.DickeC.TomazicS.BillinghurstM. (2008). A user study of auditory versus visual interfaces for use while driving. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 318–332.
165.
SpenceC.DriverJ. (1997). Audiovisual links in attention: Implications for interface design. In HarrisD. (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics: Vol. 2. Job design and product design (pp. 185–192). Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
166.
SpenceC.HoC. (2008a). The multisensory driver: Implications for ergonomic car interface design. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
167.
SpenceC.HoC. (2008b). Multisensory interface design for drivers: Past, present, and future. Ergonomics, 51, 65–70.
168.
SpenceC.ReadL. (2003). Speech shadowing while driving: On the difficulty of splitting attention between eye and ear. Psychological Science, 14, 251–256.
169.
StarrG. E.PittM. A. (1997). Interference effects in short-term memory for timbre. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 486–494.
170.
StaubauchM. (2009). Factors correlated with traffic accidents as a basis for evaluating advanced driver assistance systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41, 1025–1033.
171.
StephanK. L.SmithS. E.MartinR. L.ParkerS.McAnallyK. I. (2006). Learning and retention of associations between auditory icons and denotative referents: Implications for the design of auditory warnings. Human Factors, 48, 288–299.
172.
StevensC. J.BrennanD.PetoczA.HowellC. (2009). Designing informative warning signals: Effects of indicator type, modality, and task demand on recognition speed and accuracy. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 5, 84–90.
173.
StevensS. S. (1936). A scale for the measurement of a psychological magnitude: Loudness. Psychological Review, 43, 405–416.
174.
StevensS. S.MillerJ.TruscottI. (1946). The masking of speech by sine waves, square waves, and regular and modulated pulses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 18, 418–424.
175.
StevensS. S.VolkmannJ.NewmanE. B. (1937). A scale for the measurement of the psychological magnitude pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 8, 185–190.
176.
StokesA.WickensC. D.KiteK. (1990). Auditory displays. In Display technology: Human factors concepts (pp. 47–64). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
177.
StrayerD. L.DrewsF. A. (2004). Profiles in driver distraction: Effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers. Human Factors, 46, 640–649.
178.
StrayerD. L.DrewsF. A.JohnstonW. A. (2003). Cell-phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23–32.
179.
StuttsJ.FeaganesJ.ReinfurtD.RodgmanE.HamlettC.GishK.StaplinL. (2005). Driver’s exposure to distractions in their natural driving environment. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37, 1093–1101.
180.
SuzukiK.JanssonH. (2003). An analysis of driver’s steering behaviour during auditory or haptic warnings for the designing of lane departure warning system. JSAE Review, 24, 65–70.
181.
TurnbullW. W. (1944). Pitch discrimination as a function of tonal duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34, 302–316.
VilimekR.HempelT. (2005). Effects of speech and non-speech sounds on short-term memory and possible implications for in-vehicle use. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Meeting of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD05) (pp. 344–350). Limerick, Ireland: ICAD.
184.
WalkerB. N. (2002). Magnitude estimation of conceptual data dimensions for use in sonification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 211–221.
185.
WalkerB. N. (2007). Consistency of magnitude estimations with conceptual data dimensions used for sonification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 579–599.
186.
WalkerB. N.LindsayJ. (2006a). The effect of a speech discrimination task on navigation in a virtual environment. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting (pp. 1538–1541). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
187.
WalkerB. N.LindsayJ. (2006b). Navigation performance with a virtual auditory display: Effects of beacon sound, capture radius, and practice. Human Factors, 48, 265–278.
188.
WalkerB. N.NanceA.LindsayJ. (2006). Spearcons: Speech-based earcons improve navigation performance in auditory menus. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD06) (pp. 95–98). London, UK: Department of Computer Science, Queen Mary, University of London.
189.
WalkerB. N.NeesM. A. (2005). Conceptual versus perceptual training for auditory graphs. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting (pp. 1598–1601). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
190.
WarnerR. L.BentlerR. A. (2002). Thresholds of discomfort for complex stimuli: Acoustic and sound-quality predictors. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 1016–1026.
191.
WatsonC. S.KiddG. R. (1994). Factors in the design of effective auditory displays. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD94) (pp. 293–303). Sante Fe, NM: ICAD.
192.
WatsonM. (2006). Scalable earcons: Bridging the gap between intermittent and continuous auditory displays. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD06). London, UK: Department of Computer Science, Queen Mary, University of London.
193.
WatsonM.SandersonP. M. (2007). Designing for attention with sound: Challenges and extensions to ecological interface design. Human Factors, 49, 331–346.
194.
WegerU. W.MeierB. P.RobinsonM. D.InhoffA. W. (2007). Things are sounding up: Affective influences on auditory tone perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 517–521.
WickensC. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 159–177.
197.
WickensC. D.SeppeltB. (2002). Interference with driving or in-vehicle task information: The effects of auditory versus visual delivery (Tech. Rep. No. AHFD-02-18/GM-02-3). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Aviation Human Factors Division.
198.
WightmanF. L.KistlerD. J. (1983). Headphone simulation of free-field listening. I: Stimulus synthesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 858–867.
199.
WinklerI.KorzyukovO.GumenyukV.CowanN.Linkenkaer-HansenK.IlmoniemiR. J.NäätänenR. (2002). Temporary and longer term retention of acoustic information. Psychophysiology, 39, 530–534.
200.
WoldorffM. G.GallenC. C.HampsonS. A.HillyardS. A.PantevC.SobelD.BloomF. E. (1993). Modulation of early sensory processing in human auditory cortex during auditory selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90, 8722–8726.
201.
WoodsD. L.AlainC.DiazR.RhodesD.OgawaK. H. (2001). Location and frequency cues in auditory selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 65–74.
