The study of slips and falls has traditionally focused on body kinematics and tribology. However, this strictly mechanical approach does not allow scientists to assess the importance of each component in relation to the complete system, and thus it lacks integration. The purpose of this chapter is to present and demonstrate the components of a broad analysis for in-depth understanding of slips and falls while walking on level surfaces. In most slip-and-fall studies, balance analysis is simplified and attributed to the point of heel contact. To determine sufficient fall prevention strategies, however, one must analyze balance before the critical moment of lost control. Such an approach requires the sciences of biomechanics, mechanics, anatomy, and neuromuscular control, as well as tribology. Causes of slips and falls are complex, and prevention approaches are often reactive, driven by high-injury trends and lawsuits. Prevention strategies need to be more proactive: Understanding the causes of accidents can help in identifying and correcting hazards before they cause problems. Examples include reporting incidents, selecting the right flooring, selecting footwear, and implementing proper floor-cleaning procedures. A combined effort among all members of the organization, including communication across the entire work system, is critical to the success of slip-and-fall prevention efforts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ANSI/ASSE. (2006). A1264.2–2006 Standard for the provision of slip-resistance on walking/working surfaces. New York: American National Standards Institute.
2.
ASTM International. (2004a). Standard guide for composing walkway surface evaluation and incident report forms for slips, stumbles, trips and falls (No. ASTM F1694). West Conshohocken, PA: Author.
3.
ASTM International. (2004b). Standard test method for using a variable incidence tribometer (VIT) (No. F1679). West Conshohocken, PA: Author.
4.
ASTM International. (2005a). Standard test method for using a horizontal pull slipmeter (HPS) (F605–05). West Conshohocken, PA: Author.
5.
ASTM International. (2005b). Standard test method for using a portable inclinable articulated strut slip tester (PIAST; No. F1677–05). West Conshohocken, PA: Author.
6.
BouissetS.ZattaraM. (1987). Biomechanical study of the programming of anticipatory postural adjustments associated with voluntary movement. Journal of Biomechanics, 20, 735–742.
7.
BouissetS.ZattaraM. (1990). Segmental movement as a perturbation to balance? Facts and concepts. In WintersJ. M.WooS. L.-Y. (Eds.), Multiple muscle systems: Biomechanics and movement organization (pp. 498–506). New York: Springer-Verlag.
8.
BowmanR. (1997). Overstepping the mark—Practical difficulties in maintaining a slip resistance standard. Paper presented at the International Ergonomics Association 13th Triennial Congress, Tampere, Finland.
9.
British Standards Institution. (1984). Stairs, ladders and walkways (No. BSI 5395). Milton Keynes, England: Author.
10.
BurnfieldJ. M.PowersC. M. (2003). Influence of age and gender on utilized coefficient of friction while walking at different speeds. In MarpetM. I.SapienzaM. A. (Eds.), Metrology of pedestrian locomotion and slip resistance (ASTM STP 1424; pp. 3–16). Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
11.
ChamR.RedfernM. S. (2001). Effect of flooring on standing comfort and fatigue. Human Factors, 43, 381–391.
12.
ChangW. R. (2004). Preferred surface microscopic geometric features on floors as potential interventions for slip and fall accidents. Journal of Safety Research, 35(1), 71–79.
13.
ChangW. R.GrönqvistR.LeclercqS.BrungraberR. J.MattkeU.StrandbergL., et al. (2001). The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2: Survey of friction measurement devices. Ergonomics, 44, 1233–1261.
14.
ChangW. R.GrönqvistR.LeclercqS.MyungR.MakkonenL.StrandbergL., et al. (2001). The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 1: Friction mechanisms and definition of test conditions. Ergonomics, 44, 1217–1232.
15.
ChangW. R.KimI. J.ManningD. P.BunterngchitY. (2001). The role of surface roughness in the measurement of slipperiness. Ergonomics, 44, 1200–1216.
16.
Di PillaS. (2003). Slip and fall prevention: A practical handbook. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
17.
DoM. C.BrenièreY.BrenguierP. (1982). A biomechanical study of balance recovery during the fall forward. Journal of Biomechanics, 15, 933–939.
18.
EnglishW. (2003). Pedestrian slip resistance: How to measure it and how to improve it. Alva, FL: William English, Inc.
19.
FiliaggiA. J.CourtneyT. K. (2003). Restaurant hazards: Practice-based approaches to disabling occupational injuries. Professional Safety, 48(5), 18–23.
20.
Gielo-PerczakK. (2001). Systems approach to slips and falls research. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2, 124–141.
21.
GrabinerM. D.KohT. J.LundinT. M.JahnigenD. W. (1993). Kinematics of recovery from a stumble. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 48(3), M97–M102.
22.
GrandjeanE. (1973). Ergonomics of the home. London: Taylor & Francis.
23.
GrönqvistR. (1995). A dynamic method for assessing pedestrian slip resistance (People and Work Research Report No. 2). Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.
24.
GrönqvistR.AbeysekeraJ.GardG.HsiangS. M.LeamonT. B.NewmanD. J., et al. (2003). Human-centred approaches in slipperiness measurement. In ChangW. R.CourtneyT. K.GrönqvistR.RedfernM. S. (Eds.), Measuring slipperiness: Human locomotion and surface factors (pp. 67–99). London: Taylor & Francis.
25.
GrönqvistR.ChangW.-R.CourtneyT. K.LeamonT. B.RedfernM. S.StrandbergL. (2001). Measurement of slipperiness: Fundamental concepts and definitions. Ergonomics, 44, 1102–1117.
26.
GrönqvistR.HirvonenM. (1995). Slipperiness of footwear and mechanisms of walking friction on icy surfaces. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 16, 191–200.
27.
HansonJ. P.RedfernM. S.MazumdarM. (1999). Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction. Ergonomics, 42, 1619–1633.
28.
Health and Safety Executive. (1999). Preventing slips in the food and drink industries—Technical update on floor specifications (HSE No. Food Sheet No 22). Sudbury, England: HSE Books.
29.
HendrickH. W.KleinerB. M. (2001). Macroergonomics: An introduction to work system design. Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
30.
HorakF. B. (1997). Clinical assessment of balance disorders. Gait and Posture, 6, 76–84.
31.
IrvineC. H. (1970). Shoe sole slipperiness on structured steel. Materials Research and Standards, 10(4), 21–23.
32.
IrvineC. H. (1976). Evaluation of some factors affecting measurements of slip resistance of shoe sole materials on floor surfaces. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 4(4), 133–138.
33.
JacobsR.Burleigh-JacobsA. (2000). Neuro-muscular control strategies in postural coordination. In WintersJ. M.CargoP. E. (Eds.), Biomechanics and neural control of movement. New York: Springer-Verlag.
34.
LeamonT. B.LiK.-W. (1990). Microslip length and the perception of slipping. Paper presented at the 23rd International Congress on Occupational Health, Montreal.
35.
LeamonT. B.MurphyP. L. (1995). Occupational slips and falls: More than a trivial problem. Ergonomics, 38, 487–498.
36.
Liberty Mutual Group. (2004). Liberty Mutual workplace safety index. Boston: Author.
37.
MaynardW. S.CurryD. G. (2005, June). A macroergonomic approach to managing slips and falls in the workplace. Paper presented at the 8th International Symposium on Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management, Maui, HI.
38.
MillerJ. M. (1983). Slippery work surfaces: Towards a performance definition and quantitative coefficient of friction criteria. Journal of Safety Research, 14, 145–158.
39.
MurphyP. L.CourtneyT. K. (2000). Low back pain disability: Relative costs by antecedent and industry group. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 37, 558–571.
40.
NashnerL. M. (1985). Strategies for organization of human posture. In IgarashiM.BlackF. O. (Eds.), 7th International Symposium International Society of Posturography: Vestibular and Visual Control on Posture and Locomotor Equilibrium (pp. 1–8). Houston, TX: Karger, Basel.
41.
National Safety Council. (2002). ASC/ANSI Z365 Management of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (Final Draft December 2002). Retrieved August 18, 2006, from http://www.nsc.org/ehc/z365/newdrft.htm.
42.
PaiY.-C.IqbalK. (1999). Simulated movement termination for balance recovery: Can movement strategies be sought to maintain stability in the presence of slipping or forced sliding? Journal of Biomechanics, 32, 779–786.
43.
RedfernM. S.ChamR.Gielo-PerczakK.GrönqvistR.HirvonenM.LanshammarH., et al. (2001). Biomechanics of slips. Ergonomics, 44, 1138–1166.
44.
RobertsonM. M.MaynardW.HuangY. H. E.McDevittJ. R. (2002). Telecommuting: An overview of macroergonomic issues. Paper presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD.
SmithR. H. (2002). Examination of sticktion in wet-walkway slip-resistant testing. In MarpetM. I.SapienzaM. A. (Eds.), Metrology of pedestrian locomotion and slip-resistance. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
47.
Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (1996). Standard for slip resistance of floor surface materials, UL 410. Northbrook, IL: Author.
48.
WinterD. A.PatlaA. E.PrinceF.IshacM.Gielo-PerczakK. (1998). Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 1211–1221.
49.
WolfD. (1998). Keep it clean by being up front. Professional Retail Store Maintenance, September, 84–86.
50.
YangJ. F.WinterD. A.WellsR. P. (1990). Postural dynamics of walking in humans. Biological Cybernetics, 62, 321–330.
