Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Intimate partner abuse and violence victim-survivors may be involved in multiple legal cases across civil and criminal legal systems as they seek safety. Most research explores women’s experiences in only individual cases or systems. Drawing on 172 in-depth quantitative surveys with female victim-survivors seeking civil protection orders, the current study explores how prior case experiences relate to current case perceptions. Findings suggest increased system involvement leads to decreased perceptions of system fairness and satisfaction. Survivors with prior system involvement perceived protection orders as less effective than those with no prior involvement. Implications for future research and advocacy are discussed.

Keywords

courts domestic violence intimate partner violence legal issues protection orders

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aborisade

R. A.

(2023). On the ‘darkness of dark figure’ of sexual crimes: Survivors’ rape reporting experiences with the Nigerian police. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 73(2), 100576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2023.100576

Battle

B. P.

Powell

A. J.

(2024). We keep Us safe: Abolition feminism as a challenge to carceral feminist responses to gendered violence. Gender & Society, 38(4), 523–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432241263582

Bower

L. J.

(2025). Is ‘victim-survivor’ our imperfect alternative to describing people with lived experience of sexual violence? A feminist symbolic interactionist analysis, considering how ethnicity, gender, and disability interact with language choice. Violence Against Women, 1–22. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012251338454

Brooks-Hay

(2020). Doing the “right thing”? Understanding why rape victim-survivors report to the police. Feminist Criminology, 15(2), 174–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085119859079

Cattaneo

L. B.

Cho

Botuck

(2011). Describing intimate partner stalking over time: An effort to inform victim-centered service provision. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(17), 3428–3454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511403745

Douglas

(2018). Legal systems abuse and coercive control. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 18(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/174889581772838

Durfee

(2021). The use of structural intersectionality as a method to analyze how the domestic violence civil protective order process replicates inequality. Violence Against Women, 27(5), 639–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220958495

Durfee

Goodmark

(2020). Re-envisioning protective orders for domestic violence. In Fleury-Steiner

R. E.

Hefner

M. K.

Miller

S. L.

(Eds.), Civil court responses to intimate partner violence and abuse (pp. 63–88). Cognella.

Elliott

Thomas

S. D. M.

Ogloff

J. R. P.

(2011). Procedural justice in contacts with the police: Testing a relational model of authority in a mixed methods study. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(4), 592–610. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024212

10.

Fleury-Steiner

R. E.

Fleury‐Steiner

B. D.

Miller

S. L.

(2011). More than a piece of paper? Protection orders as a resource for battered women. Sociology Compass, 5(7), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00383.x

11.

Fleury-Steiner

R. E.

Miller

S. L.

Maloney

Bonistall Postel

(2016). “No contact, except...”: Visitation decisions in protection orders for intimate partner abuse. Feminist Criminology, 11(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085114554259

12.

Gover

A. R.

Brank

E. M.

MacDonald

J. M.

(2007). A specialized domestic violence court in South Carolina: An example of procedural justice for victims and defendants. Violence Against Women, 13(6), 603–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801207301553

13.

Gutowski

Goodman

L. A.

(2020). Like i’m invisible: IPV survivor-mothers perceptions of seeking child custody through the family court system. Journal of Family Violence, 35(5), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/si0896-019-00063-1

14.

Hefner

M. K.

Qiu

Fleury-Steiner

R. E.

Miller

S. L.

(2025). “He just wants to get under my skin”: Systemic barriers that mother-survivors confront while prioritizing protection. Violence Against Women. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012251334766

15.

Hohl

Johnson

Molisso

(2022). A procedural justice theory approach to police engagement with victim-survivors of rape and sexual assault: Initial findings of the ‘Project Bluestone’ pilot study. International Criminology, 2(3), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43576-022-00056-z

16.

Khaw

Bermea

A. M.

Hardesty

J. L.

Saunders

Whittaker

A. M.

(2021). The system had choked me too: Abused mothers perceptions of the custody determination process that resulted in negative custody outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9-10), 4310–4334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518791226

17.

Laing

(2017). Secondary victimization: Domestic violence survivors navigating the family law system. Violence Against Women, 23(11), 1314–1335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216659942

18.

Laing

Heward-Belle

(2020). Domestic violence and family law. In Fleury-Steiner

R. E.

Hefner

M. K.

Miller

S. L.

(Eds.), Civil court responses to intimate partner violence and abuse (pp. 89–114). Cognella Academic Publishing.

19.

Liu

V. C.

Nelson

L. E.

Shorey

(2024). Experiences of women receiving trauma-informed care: A qualitative systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(4), 3054–3065. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241234346

20.

Lorenz

Jacobsen

(2021). Sexual violence survivors’ experiences with the police and willingness to report future victimization. Women & Criminal Justice, 34(2), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2021.1985045

21.

Maguire

E. R.

Atkin-Plunk

C. A.

Wells

(2021). The effects of procedural justice on cooperation and compliance among inmates in a work release program. Justice Quarterly, 38(6), 1128–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1634753

22.

Miller

S. L.

Hefner

M. K.

(2015). Procedural justice for victims and offenders: Exploring restorative justice processes in Australia and the U.S. Justice Quarterly, 32(1), 142–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.760643

23.

Miller

Hefner

M. K.

Fleury-Steiner

(2023). Challenges of “paper abuse” continue in legal proceedings. Domestic Violence Report, 28(3), 39.

24.

Miller

S. L.

Manzer

J. L.

(2021). Safeguarding children’s well-being: Voices from abused mothers navigating their relationships and the civil courts. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9–10), 4545–4569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518791599

25.

Miller

S. L.

Smolter

N. L.

(2011). “Paper abuse”: When all else fails, batterers use procedural stalking. Violence Against Women, 17(5), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012114072

26.

Miller

S. L.

Smolter

N. L.

(2012). Paper abuse: Documenting new abuse tactics. Domestic Violence Report, 17(5), 65–67.

27.

Morrow

W. J.

Vickovic

S. G.

(2024). Exploring perceptions of police legitimacy: The role of family, friends, and procedural justice. Criminal Justice Review, 49(4), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168231159368

28.

Murphy

Barkworth

(2014). Victim willingness to report crime to police: Does procedural justice or outcome matter Most? Victims and Offenders, 9(2), 178–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2013.872744

29.

Paternoster

Bachman

Brame

Sherman

L. W.

(1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31(1), 163–204. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054098

30.

Pinchevsky

G. M.

Miller

S. L.

Goodmark

(2025). “Stop giving us what you think we need. Come to us and ask us what we need”: Justice perceptions among survivors of domestic abuse. Violence Against Women, 31(10), 2661–2681. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012241265361

31.

Pryce

D. K.

Wilson

(2020). Police procedural justice, lawyer procedural justice, judge procedural justice, and satisfaction with the criminal justice system: Findings from a neglected region of the world. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31(9), 1286–1311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419900230

32.

Richards

T. N.

Tudor

Gover

A. R.

(2018). An updated assessment of personal protective order statutes in the United States: Have statutes become more progressive in the past decade? Violence Against Women, 24(7), 816–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217722237

33.

Richie

B. E.

Eife

(2021). Black bodies at the dangerous intersection of gender violence and mass criminalization. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 30(7), 877–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2019.1703063

34.

Stark

(2007). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life: University Press.

35.

Straus

M. A.

Hamby

S. L.

Boney-McCoy

Sugarman

D. B.

(1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017003001

36.

The Institute for Child and Family Well-Being . (2020). Translating trauma-informed principles into trauma-responsive practices: University of Wisconsin. https://uwm.edu/icfw/translating-trauma-informed-principles-into-trauma-responsive-practices/

37.

Thibault

Walker

(1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Wiley.

38.

Tolman

R. M.

(1999). The validation of the psychological maltreatment of women inventory. Violence & Victims, 14(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.14.1.25

39.

Tyler

T. R.

(1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendants’ evaluations of their courtroom experience. Law & Society Review, 18(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053480

40.

Tyler

T. R.

(1990). Why people obey the law. Yale University Press.

41.

van Hall

Dirkzwager

A. J. E.

Van der Laan

P. H.

Nieuwbeerta

(2023). Procedural justice, perceived legitimacy, and reoffending behavior: In police and court setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50(12), 1874–1892. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231206833

42.

Wells

(2007). Type of contact and evaluations of police officers: The effects of procedural justice across three types of police-citizen contacts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(6), 612–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.09.006

43.

Wemmers

J. A.

(2013). Victims’ experiences in the criminal justice system and their recovery from crime. International Review of Victimology, 19(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758013492755

44.

White

Hogan

Shelley

Unnithan

N. P.

(2018). The influence of procedural justice on citizen satisfaction with state law enforcement. Policing: International Journal, 41(6), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-02-2017-0026

45.

Zweig

J. M.

Burt

M. R.

(2006). Predicting case outcomes and women's perceptions of the legal system's response to domestic violence and sexual assault: Does interaction between community agencies matter? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17(2), 202–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403405280944

Intimate Partner Abuse and Violence Victim-Survivors’ Experiences With and Perceptions of Navigating Multiple Legal Cases

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References