Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Using Agnew’s (1992) general strain theory (GST), we assess the connection between men’s strained masculinity (stress at subordination to women scenarios), anger produced by strained masculinity, and endorsing friends’ harassment and abuse of women. In a convenience sample of 859 men aged 18 to 32, men who report greater strain and anger in response to hypothetical scenarios and men higher in trait anger are more likely to endorse friends’ violence against women. We contribute to GST by testing the effects of both state and trait anger as a link between strained masculinity and endorsement of violence and exploitation of women.

Keywords

masculinity violence against women anger gender general strain theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrunhosa

de Castro Rodrigues

Cruz

A. R.

Gonçalves

R. A.

Cunha

(2021). Crimes against women: From violence to homicide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(23–24), NP12973–NP12996. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520905547

Agnew

(1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x

Agnew

(2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Crime and Delinquency, 38(4), 319–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427801038004001

Agnew

(2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. Oxford University Press.

Agnew

(2013). When criminal coping is likely: An extension of general strain theory. Deviant Behavior, 34(8), 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2013.766529

Akers

R. L.

(1998). Social learning theory: A social learning perspective on deviant behavior. In Williams

McShane

(Eds.), Criminology theory (2nd ed., pp. 83–112). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315721781

Allison

Klein

B. R.

(2021). Pursuing hegemonic masculinity through violence: An examination of anti-homeless bias homicides. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13–14), 6859–6882. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518821459

Bohner

Siebler

Schmelcher

(2006). Social norms and the likelihood of raping: Perceived rape myth acceptance of others affects men’s rape proclivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205280912

Bollen

K. A.

Pearl

(2013). Eight myths about causality and structural equation models. In Morgan

S. L.

(Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research (pp. 301–328). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6094-3_15

10.

Bosson

J. K.

Vandello

J. A.

(2011). Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402669

11.

Bosson

J. K.

Vandello

J. A.

Burnaford

R. M.

Weaver

J. R.

Arzu Wasti

(2009). Precarious manhood and displays of physical aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(5), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208331161

12.

Broidy

Agnew

(1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(3), 275–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427897034003001

13.

Buss

A. H.

Perry

(1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452

14.

Cohn

A. M.

Seibert

L. A.

Zeichner

(2009). The role of restrictive emotionality, trait anger, and masculinity threat in men’s perpetration of physical aggression. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 10(3), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015151

15.

Collibee

Rizzo

Bleiweiss

Orchowski

L. M.

(2021). The influence of peer support for violence and peer acceptance of rape myths on multiple forms of interpersonal violence among youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(15–16), 7185–7201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519832925

16.

Connley

(2020). Nearly 30% of men say progress toward gender equality has come at their expense, according to new report. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/13/nearly-30percent-of-men-say-gains-toward-gender-equality-has-come-at-their-expense.html

17.

Dahl

Vescio

Weaver

(2015). How threats to masculinity sequentially cause public discomfort, anger, and ideological dominance over women. Social Psychology, 46(4), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000248

18.

de Boise

Hearn

(2017). Are men getting more emotional? Critical sociological perspectives on men, masculinities and emotions. The Sociological Review, 65(4), 779–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026116686500

19.

De Coster

Cornell Zito

(2010). Gender and general strain theory: The gendering of emotional experiences and expressions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(2), 224–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986209359853

20.

DeKeseredy

W. S.

(1988). Woman abuse in dating relationships: The role of male peer support (pp. 1–123). Office of Justice Programs. NCJRS Virtual Library. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/woman-abuse-dating-relationships-role-male-peer-suport

21.

DeKeseredy

W. S.

(2019). Male violence against women in intimate relationships: The contribution of stress and male peer support. In Jacobsen

M. H.

Walklate

(Eds.), Emotions and crime (pp. 13–28). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781351017633-2/male-violence-women-intimate-relationships-walter-dekeseredy

22.

DeKeseredy

W. S.

(2022). Male peer support theory. In Harkness

Peterson

J. R.

Bowden

Pedersen

Donnermeyer

(Eds.), The encyclopedia of rural crime (pp. 40–42). Bristol University Press. https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/display/book/9781529222036/ch010.xml

23.

DeKeseredy

W. S.

Schwartz

M. D.

(Eds.), (2013). Male peer support and violence against women: The history and verification of a theory. Northeastern University Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/26950/

24.

Dolliver

M. J.

Rocker

D. L.

(2018). Addressing a divide in the conceptualization of the gender-crime relationship: A comparative test of gender and sex using general strain theory. Deviant Behavior, 39(12), 1552–1565. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1410619

25.

Eisler

R. M.

Skidmore

J. R.

(1987). Masculine gender role stress: Scale development and component factors in the appraisal of stressful situations. Behavior Modification, 11(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455870112001

26.

Eriksson

Mazerolle

(2013). A general strain theory of intimate partner homicide. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(5), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2013.07.002

27.

Froggio

Agnew

(2007). The relationship between crime and “objective” versus “subjective” strains. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.11.017

28.

Gallagher

K. E.

Parrott

D. J.

(2011). What accounts for men’s hostile attitudes toward women? The influence of hegemonic male role norms and masculine gender role stress. Violence Against Women, 17(5), 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211407296

29.

Ganem

N. M.

(2010). The role of negative emotion in general strain theory. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986209359558

30.

Glomb

S. M.

Espelage

D. L.

(2005). The influence of restrictive emotionality in men’s emotional appraisal of sexual harassment: A gender role interpretation. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6(4), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.6.4.240

31.

Grewal

Cote

J. A.

Baumgartner

(2004). Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Science, 23(4), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0070

32.

Harrington

A. G.

Overall

N. C.

Cross

E. J.

(2021). Masculine gender role stress, low relationship power, and aggression toward intimate partners. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 22(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000262

33.

Harrison

B. F.

Michelson

M. R.

(2019). Gender, masculinity threat, and support for transgender rights: An experimental study. Sex Roles, 80(1–2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0916-6

34.

Hearn

(1993). Emotive subjects: Organizational men, organizational masculinities, and the (de)construction of “emotions”. In Fineman

(Ed.), Emotion in organizations (pp. 142–166). Sage.

35.

Heise

D. R.

Calhan

(1995). Emotion norms in interpersonal events. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787125

36.

Heise

D. R.

Weir

(1999). A test of symbolic interactionist predictions about emotions in imagined situations. Symbolic Interaction, 22(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1999.22.2.139

37.

Hossein Kordvani

(2002). Hegemonic masculinity, domination, and violence against women. Australian domestic & family violence clearinghouse. UNSW. https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/21065

38.

Hunnicutt

(2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting “patriarchy” as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15(5), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208331246

39.

Igielnik

Menasce Horowitz

(2020). A century after women gained the right to vote, majority of Americans see work to do on gender equality. Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/07/07/a-century-after-women-gained-the-right-to-vote-majority-of-americans-see-work-to-do-on-gender-equality/

40.

Isom Scott

D. A.

Stevens Andersen

(2020). ‘Whitelash?’ Status threat, anger, and white America: A general strain theory approach. Journal of Crime and Justice, 43(4), 414–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2019.1704835

41.

Jakupcak

Lisak

Roemer

(2002). The role of masculine ideology and masculine gender role stress in men’s perpetration of relationship violence. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 3(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1037//1524-9220.3.2.97

42.

Jakupcak

Tull

M. T.

Roemer

(2005). Masculinity, shame, and fear of emotions as predictors of men’s expressions of anger and hostility. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6(4), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.6.4.275

43.

Kaufman

J. M.

(2009). Gendered responses to serious strain: The argument for a general strain theory of deviance. Justice Quarterly, 26(3), 410–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820802427866

44.

Krebs

Lindquist

Berzofsky

Shook-Sa

Peterson

(2016). Campus climate survey validation study final technical report (NCJ 249545) (pp. 1–193). Bureau of Justice Statistics Research and Development Series. RTI International. https://rvap.uiowa.edu/sites/rvap.uiowa.edu/files/imports/Uploads/2898aa5950/Campus-Climate-Survey-2016.pdf

45.

(2022). The applicability of social structure and social learning theory to explain intimate partner violence perpetration across national contexts. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(23–24), NP22475–NP22500. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211072166

46.

Logoz

Eggenberger

Komlenac

Schneeberger

Ehlert

Walther

(2023). How do traditional masculinity ideologies and emotional competence relate to aggression and physical domestic violence in cisgender men? Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1100114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1100114

47.

Maass

Cadinu

Guarnieri

Grasselli

(2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 853–870. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.853

48.

Mazerolle

Piquero

A. R.

Capowich

G. E.

(2003). Examining the links between strain, situational and dispositional anger, and crime: Further specifying and testing general strain theory. Youth & Society, 35(2), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X03255029

49.

McDermott

R. C.

Lopez

F. G.

(2013). College men’s intimate partner violence attitudes: Contributions of adult attachment and gender role stress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(1), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030353

50.

Messerschmidt

J. W.

(2000a). Nine lives: Adolescent masculinities, the body, and violence. Westview Press.

51.

Messerschmidt

J. W.

(2000b). Becoming “real men” adolescent masculinity challenges and sexual violence. Men and Masculinities, 2(3), 286–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X00002003003

52.

Messerschmidt

J. W.

(2005). Men, masculinities, and crime. In Kimmel

Hearn

Connell

R. W.

(Eds.), Handbook of studies on men & masculinities (pp. 196–212). Sage. https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/handbook-of-studies-on-men-and-masculinities

53.

Messerschmidt

J. W.

(2017). Masculinities and femicide. Qualitative Sociology Review, 13(3), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.13.3.05

54.

Moon

Morash

McCluskey

C. P.

Hwang

H.-W.

(2009). A comprehensive test of general strain theory: Key strains, situational- and trait-based negative emotions, conditioning factors, and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46(2), 182–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427808330873

55.

Moore

T. M.

Stuart

G. L.

(2004). Effects of masculine gender role stress on men’s cognitive, affective, physiological, and aggressive responses to intimate conflict situations. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5(2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.5.2.132

56.

Munsch

C. L.

Gruys

(2018). What threatens, defines: Tracing the symbolic boundaries of contemporary masculinity. Sex Roles, 79(7–8), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1119901708780

57.

Munsch

C. L.

Willer

(2012). The role of gender identity threat in perceptions of date rape and sexual coercion. Violence Against Women, 18(10), 1125–1146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212465151

58.

Piquero

N. L.

Fox

Piquero

A. R.

Capowich

Mazerolle

(2010). Gender, general strain theory, negative emotions, and disordered eating. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9466-0

59.

Piquero

N. L.

Sealock

M. D.

(2004). Gender and general strain theory: A preliminary test of Broidy and agnew’s gender/GST hypotheses. Justice Quarterly, 21(1), 125–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820400095761

60.

Pusch

(2022). A meta-analytic review of social learning theory and teen dating violence perpetration. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 61(2), 171–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278221130004

61.

Rebellon

C. J.

Manasse

M. E.

Van Gundy

K. T.

Cohn

E. S.

(2012). Perceived injustice and delinquency: A test of general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(3), 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.02.001

62.

Reidy

D. E.

Shirk

S. D.

Sloan

C. A.

Zeichner

(2009). Men who aggress against women: Effects of feminine gender role violation on physical aggression in hypermasculine men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014794

63.

Richmond

Levant

(2003). Clinical application of the gender role strain paradigm: Group treatment for adolescent boys. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59(11), 1237–1245. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10214

64.

Rodríguez-Menés

Safranoff

(2021). Status inconsistencies and power in intimate relations: Domestic exploitation and violence against women in homogenous and mixed couples formed by native and migrant partners. Violence Against Women, 27(12–13), 2231–2254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220963877

65.

Schwartz

M. D.

DeKeseredy

W. S.

(1997). Sexual assault on the college campus: The role of male peer support. Sage Publications.

66.

Slaatten

Malterud

(2023). Boys perpetrating sexual harassment on peer girls in secondary school: A focus group study about pupils’ experiences. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 52(5), 582–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948231172250

67.

Sullivan

H. B.

(2011). “Hey lady, you’re hot!” Emotional and cognitive effects of gender-based street harassment on women. Indiana University of Pennsylvania. PhD Dissertation.

68.

Thaxton

Agnew

(2018). When criminal coping is likely: An examination of conditioning effects in general strain theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(4), 887–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9358-5

69.

Vandello

J. A.

Bosson

J. K.

Cohen

Burnaford

R. M.

Weaver

J. R.

(2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1325–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012453

70.

Weaver

K. S.

Vescio

T. K.

(2015). The justification of social inequality in response to masculinity threats. Sex Roles, 72(11–12), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0484-y

71.

West

Zimmerman

(1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002

72.

Willer

Rogalin

C. L.

Conlon

Wojnowicz

M. T.

(2013). Overdoing gender: A test of the masculine overcompensation thesis. American Journal of Sociology, 118(4), 980–1022. https://doi.org/10.1086/668417

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.26 MB

Subordination to Women,Anger,and Endorsement of Violence Against Women: A Test of General Strain Theory

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material