Working Within and Outside the System: Why and When Survivors Seek Help After Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence

Abstract

This paper explores the experiences of survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) who seek help or avoid help from both within and outside the criminal legal system (CLS). Data derived from 22 interviews reveal four types of help-seeking experiences: (1) addressing harm (2) increasing harm (3) mandating participation and (4) avoiding participation. These types reflect the interactions between the CLS and vulnerable populations who frequently mistrust the CLS but are compelled to interact with it. This typology uncovers the complex realities of survivors’ contact with the CLS and suggests less harmful alternatives as desired by the participants in our sample.

Keywords

intimate partner violence criminal legal system anti-carceral feminism help-seeking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bach

W. A.

(2022). Prosecuting poverty, criminalizing care. Cambridge University Press.

Bernstein

(2010). Militarized humanitarianism meets carceral feminism: The politics of sex, rights, and freedom in contemporary antitrafficking campaigns. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36(1), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/652918

Birks

Chapman

Francis

(2008). Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987107081254

Brooks-Hay

(2020). Doing the “right thing”? Understanding why rape victim-survivors report to the police. Feminist Criminology, 15(2), 174–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085119859079

Brown

Schept

(2016). New abolition, criminology and a critical carceral studies. Punishment & Society, 19(4), 440–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516666281

Center for Disease Control and Prevention . (2022, October 11). Fast facts: Preventing intimate partner violence. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence.html

Collins

P. H.

(1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), s14–s32. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1986.33.6.03a00020

Davis

A. Y.

Dent

Meiners

E. R.

Ritchie

B. E.

(2022). Abolition. Feminism. Now. Haymarket Books.

Decker

M. R.

Holliday

C. N.

Hameeduddin

Shah

Miller

Dantzler

Goodmark

(2019). “You do not think of me as a human being”: Race and gender inequities intersect to discourage police reporting of violence against women. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 96(5), 772–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-019-00359-z

10.

Espinoza

L. E.

Talleff

J. L.

Resendiz

Zavala

L. N.

Anangwe

K. A.

(2022). A comparative study of intimate partner violence among U.S.-born and foreign-born Hispanic women. Social Science Quarterly, 103(4), 833–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13175

11.

Ewick

Silbey

S. S.

(1998). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. The University of Chicago Press.

12.

Garza

A. D.

Franklin

C. A.

Goodson

(2022). Police response to Latina immigrant intimate partner violence victims: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(19-20), NP18784–NP18809. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211037980

13.

Goodmark

(2022). Assessing the impact of the violence against women act. Annual Review of Criminology, 5, 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-095322

14.

Goodmark

(2023). Imperfect victims: Criminalized survivors and the promise of abolition feminism. UC Press.

15.

Hattery

A. J.

(2009). Intimate partner violence. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

16.

Hattery

A. J.

Smith

(2021). Policing Black bodies: How Black lives are surveilled and how to work for change. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

17.

Hulley

Bailey

Kirkman

Gibbs

G. R.

Gomersall

Latif

Jones

(2023). Intimate partner violence and barriers to help-seeking among Black, Asian, minority ethnic and immigrant women: A qualitative metasynthesis of global research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(2), 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211050590

18.

Kaba

(2021). We do this ‘til we free us: Abolitionist organizing and transforming justice. Haymarket Books.

19.

Kim

M. E.

(2018). From carceral feminism to transformative justice: Women-of-color feminism and alternatives to incarceration. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 27(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2018.1474827

20.

Kim

M. E.

(2020). Anti-carceral feminism: The contradictions of progress and the possibilities of counter-hegemonic struggle. Affilia, 35(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109919878276

21.

Laing

(2017). Secondary victimization: Domestic violence survivors navigating the family law system. Violence Against Women, 23(11), 1314–1335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216659942.

22.

Larance

L. Y.

Goodmark

Miller

S. L.

Dasgupta

S. D.

(2019). Understanding and addressing women’s use of force in intimate relationships: A retrospective. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218815776

23.

McNaull

(2018). Contextualising violence: An anti-carceral feminist approach. In Killean

Dowds

McAlinden

(Eds.), Sexual violence on trial (pp. 213–228). Routledge.

24.

Meyer

(2011). Seeking help for intimate partner violence: Victims’ experiences when approaching the criminal justice system for IPV-related support and protection in an Australian jurisdiction. Feminist Criminology, 6(4), 268–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085111414860

25.

Miller

(2005). Victims as offenders: The paradox of women's violence in relationships. Rutgers University Press.

26.

Monterrosa

A. E.

(2021). Romantic (In)Justice: Criminal-legal system-impacted Black women’s romantic relationship status and quality. Feminist Criminology, 16(4), 424–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851211019472

27.

Musto

(2016). Control and protect: Collaboration, carceral protection, and domestic sex trafficking in the United States. University of California Press.

28.

Petrosky

Blair

J. M.

Betz

C. J.

Fowler

K. A.

Jack

S. P.

Lyons

B. H.

(2017). Racial and ethnic differences in homicides of adult women and the role of intimate partner violence—United States, 2003–2014. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 66(28), 741–746. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6628a1

29.

Rajan

McCloskey

K. A.

(2007). Victims of intimate partner violence: Arrest rates across recent studies. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 15(3-4), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770802097186

30.

Reina

A. S.

Lohman

B. J.

Maldonado

M. M.

(2014). “He said they’d deport me”: Factors influencing domestic violence help-seeking practices among Latina immigrants. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(4), 593–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513505214

31.

Richie

B. E.

(2012). Arrested justice: Black women, violence, and America’s prison nation. Arrested justice. New York University Press.

32.

Roberts

(2022). Torn apart: How the child welfare system destroys Black families--and how abolition can build a safer world. Basic Books.

33.

Sasson

Haukoos

J. S.

Ben-Youssef

Ramirez

Bull

Eigel

Magid

D. J.

Padilla

(2015). Barriers to calling 911 and learning and performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation for residents of primarily Latino, high-risk neighborhoods in Denver, Colorado. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 65(5), 545–552.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.028

34.

Spencer

Dodge

Ricciardelli

Ballucci

(2018). “I think it’s re-victimizing victims almost every time”: Police perceptions of criminal justice responses to sexual violence. Critical Criminology, 26(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-018-9390-2

35.

Strauss

A. L.

(1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.

36.

Sweet

P. L.

(2021). The politics of surviving: How women navigate domestic violence and its aftermath. University of California Press.

37.

Timmermans

Tavory

(2012). Theory construction in qualitative research from grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914

38.

van der Meulen

Chu

S. K. H.

Butler-McPhee

(2021). “That’s why people don’t call 911”: Ending routine police attendance at drug overdoses. International Journal of Drug Policy, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103039

39.

Vila-Henninger

Dupuy

Van Ingelgom

Caprioli

Teuber

Pennetreau

Bussi

Le Gall

(2022). Abductive coding: Theory building and qualitative (re)analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 53(2), 968–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241211067508

40.

Violence Policy Center . (2022). When men murder women. An analysis of 2020 homicide data. Violence Policy Center. https://www.vpc.org/studies/wmmw2022.pdf

41.

Waller

B. Y.

Joyce

P. A.

Quinn

C. R.

Hassan Shaari

A. A.

Boyd

D. T.

(2023). “I Am the one that needs help”: The theory of help-seeking behavior for survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(1-2), 288–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221084340

42.

West

C. M.

(2007). “Sorry, we have to take you in:” Black battered women arrested for intimate partner violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 15(3-4), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770802097277

43.

White

McMillan

(2021). [De]-Centering the victim: Police perceptions of victims of sexual violence through a comparative lens of evidence collection and processing. Feminist Criminology, 16(5), 680–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851211031991