Drawing on qualitative data from focus groups with correctional personnel in one of the nation’s largest women’s prisons, this study examines staff perceptions of how incarcerated women cope with long-term solitary confinement. We find that women’s strong ties to other women and their prison pseudofamilies may influence the behaviors that explain their placement and stays in solitary confinement. We find, too, that women are perceived to go to extreme lengths to build and maintain relationships with other women. The findings showcase unintended consequences of solitary confinement, raise questions about its effectiveness, and highlight the limits of institutional control.
AhaltC.HaneyC.RiosS.FoxM. P.FarabeeD.WilliamsB. (2017). Reducing the use and impact of solitary confinement in corrections. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 13(1), 41–48.
2.
BabbieE. (2007). The practice of social research (11th ed.). Wadsworth.
3.
BalesW.MearsD. (2008). Inmate social ties and the transition to society: Does visitation reduce recidivism?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(3), 287–321.
4.
BeckA. J. (2015). Use of restrictive housing in U.S. prisons and jails, 2011–12. U.S. Department of Justice.
5.
BelknapJ. (2014). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.
6.
BlauP. M. (1965). The comparative study of organizations. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 18(3), 323–338.
7.
BloomB.OwenB.CovingtonS. (2004). Women offenders and the gendered effects of public policy. Review of Policy Research, 21(1), 31–48.
8.
BosworthM. (1996). Resistance and compliance in women’s prisons: Toward a critique of legitimacy. Critical Criminology, 7(2), 5–19.
9.
BosworthM. (1999). Engendering resistance: Agency and power in women’s prisons. Ashgate.
10.
BriggsC. S.SundtJ. L.CastellanoT. C. (2003). The effect of supermaximum security prisons on aggregate levels of institutional violence. Criminology, 41(4), 1341–1376.
ButlerH. D.GriffinO. H.IIIJohnsonW. W. (2013). What makes you the “worst of the worst?” An examination of state policies defining supermaximum confinement. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(6), 676–694.
13.
CampS. D.GaesG. G.Klein-SaffranJ.DaggettD. M.SaylorW. G. (2002). Using inmate survey data in assessing prison performance a case study comparing private and public prisons. Criminal Justice Review, 27(1), 26–51.
14.
CarsonA. E. (2018). Prisoners in 2016. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
15.
ChadickC.BatastiniA. B.LevulisS. J.MorganR. D. (2018). The psychological impact of solitary: A longitudinal comparison of general population and long-term administrative segregated male inmates. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 23(2), 101–116.
16.
CheesemanK. A.KimB.LambertE. G.HoganN. L. (2011). Correctional officer perceptions of inmates and overall job satisfaction. Journal of Crime and Justice, 34(2), 81–102.
17.
ChoA.TascaM. (2019). Disparities in women’s prison sentences: Exploring the nexus between motherhood, drug offense, and sentence length. Feminist Criminology, 14(4), 420–440.
18.
ClarkK. (2018). The effect of mental illness on segregation following institutional misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(1), 1363–1382.
19.
CloyesK. G.LovellD.AllenD. G.RhodesL. A. (2006). Assessment of psychological impairment in a supermaximum security unit sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(6), 760–781.
20.
CelinskaK.SungH. E. (2014). Gender differences in the determinants of prison rule violations. The Prison Journal, 94(2), 220–241.
21.
CernekaH. (2017). We will not be invisible: Women and solitary confinement in the US. Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender, and Society, 32(2), 107–132.
22.
Chesney-LindM. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Sage.
23.
CochranJ. C. (2014). Breaches in the wall: Imprisonment, social support, and recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(2), 200–229.
24.
CovingtonS. S.BloomB. E. (2006). Gender-responsive treatment and services in correctional settings. Women and Therapy, 29(3–4), 9–33.
25.
CullenF. T.FisherB. S.ApplegateB. K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. Crime and Justice, 27(2000), 1–79.
26.
CullenF. T.GendreauP. (1989). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation. In GoodsteinL.MacKenzieD. L. (Eds.), American prison: Issues in research and policy (pp. 23–44). Springer.
27.
CreweB.LieblingA.HulleyS. (2011). Staff culture, use of authority, and prisoner quality of life in public and private sector prisons. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 44(1), 94–115.
28.
DalyK. (1992). Women’s pathways to felony court: Feminist theories of lawbreaking and problems of representation. Southern California Review of Law and Women’s Studies, 2(1), 11–52.
29.
DeBellJ. (2001). The female offender: Different . . . not difficult. Corrections Today, 63(1), 56–61.
30.
DeHartD.LynchS.BelknapJ.Dass-BrailsfordP.GreenB. (2013). Life history models of female offending: The roles of serious mental illness and trauma in women’s pathways to jail. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(1), 138–151.
31.
Diaz-CottoJ. (2006). Gender, sexuality, and family kinship networks. In SolingerR.JohnsonP. C.RaimonM. L.ReynoldsT.TapiaR. C. (Eds.), Interrupted life: Experiences of incarcerated women in the United States (pp. 131–144). University of California Press.
32.
EastealP. (2001). Women in Australian prisons: The cycle of abuse and dysfunctional environments. The Prison Journal, 81(1), 87–112.
33.
FarkasM. A. (1999). Correctional officer attitudes toward inmates and working with inmates in a “get tough” era. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(6), 495–506.
34.
FeeleyM. M.SimonJ. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30(4), 449–474.
35.
ForsythC.EvansR.FosterD. (2002). An analysis of intimate explanations for lesbian relationships in prison. International Journal of Sociology and the Family, 30(1/2), 67–77.
36.
ForsythC. J.EvansR. D. (2003). Reconsidering the pseudo-family/gang gender distinction in prison research. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 18(1), 15–23.
37.
FosterH. (2012). The strains of maternal imprisonment: Importation and deprivation stressors for women and children. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(3), 221–229.
38.
FrostN. A.MonteiroC. E. (2016). Administrative segregation in U.S. prisons. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S.: Issues, challenges, and future directions (pp. 1–43). National Institute of Justice.
39.
GarciaM. (Ed.). (2016). Restrictive housing in the U.S.: Issues, challenges, and future directions. National Institute of Justice.
40.
GerberM. M.JacksonJ. (2016). Authority and punishment: On the ideological basis of punitive attitudes towards criminals. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 23(1), 113–134.
41.
GiallombardoR. (1966). Society of women: A study of a women’s prison. Wiley.
42.
GilfusM. E. (1992). From victims to survivors to offenders: Women’s routes of entry and immersion into street crime. Women and Criminal Justice, 4(1), 63–89.
43.
GreerK. R. (2000). The changing nature of interpersonal relationships in a women’s prison. The Prison Journal, 80(4), 442–468.
44.
HaleR. (2020). Good intentions: Women’s narrative of post-release anticipatory desistance in the context of historical and contemporary disadvantage and trauma. Feminist Criminology, 15(5), 519–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085120923403
45.
HaneyC. (2003). Mental health issues in long-term solitary and “supermax” confinement. Crime and Delinquency, 49(1), 124–156.
46.
HaneyC. (2018). Restricting the use of solitary confinement. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 285–310.
47.
HarnerH. M. (2004). Relationships between incarcerated women. Moving beyond stereotypes. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 42(1), 38–46.
48.
HarerM. D.LanganN. P. (2001). Gender differences in predictors of prison violence: Assessing the predictive validity of a risk classification system. Crime & Delinquency, 47(4), 513–536.
49.
HoltfreterK.CuppR. (2007). Gender and risk assessment: The empirical status of the LSI-R for women. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23(4), 363–382.
50.
HoskinsK. M.CobbinaJ. E. (2019). It depends on the situation: Women’s identity transformation in prison, jail, and substance abuse treatment settings. Feminist Criminology, 15(3), 340–358.
51.
HouserK. A.BelenkoS.BrennanP. K. (2012). The effects of mental health and substance abuse disorders on institutional misconduct among female inmates. Justice Quarterly, 29(6), 799–828.
52.
HugginsD.CapeheartL.NewmanE. (2006). Deviants or scapegoats: An examination of pseudofamily groups and dyads in two Texas prisons. The Prison Journal, 86(1), 114–139.
53.
KaebleD.CowhigM. (2018). Correctional populations in the United States, 2016. Bureau and Justice Statistics.
54.
KingR. D. (1999). The rise and rise of supermax: An American solution in search of a problem?Punishment and Society, 1(2), 163–186.
55.
KitzingerJ. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance on interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 103–121.
56.
KolbA.PalysT. (2018). Playing the part: Pseudo-families, wives, and the politics of relationships in women’s prisons in California. The Prison Journal, 98(2), 678–699.
57.
KreagerD. A.KruttschnittC. (2018). Inmate society in the era of mass incarceration. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 261–286.
58.
KruegerD. A.CaseyM. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage.
59.
KruttschnittC. (2010). The paradox of women’s imprisonment. Daedalus, 139(3), 32–42.
60.
KruttschnittC.GartnerR. (2003). Women’s imprisonment. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 55–135). University of Chicago Press.
61.
KruttschnittC.GartnerR.MillerA. (2000). Doing her own time? Women’s responses to prison in the context of the old and the new penology. Criminology, 38(3), 681–718.
62.
KurkiL.MorrisN. (2001). Supermax prisons. Crime and Justice, 28(2001), 385–424.
63.
LabrecqueR. M. (2019). Assessing the impact of time spent in restrictive housing confinement on subsequent measures of institutional adjustment among men in prison. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(10), 1445–1455.
64.
LabrecqueR. M.MearsD. P. (2019). Prison system versus critics’ views on the use of restrictive housing: Objective risk classification or ascriptive assignment?The Prison Journal, 99(2), 194–218.
65.
LabrecqueR. M.SmithP. (2019). The impact of restrictive housing on inmate behavior: A systematic review of the evidence. In HuebnerB. M.FrostN. A. (Eds.), Handbook on the consequences of sentencing and punishment decisions (pp. 290–310). Routledge.
66.
LabrecqueR., M.MearsD. P.SmithP. (2020). Gender and the effect of disciplinary segregation on prison misconduct. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31(8), 1193–1216.
67.
LahmK. F. (2017). Violent and nonviolent misconduct among female inmates: An exploration of competing theories. Victims and Offenders, 12(2), 175–204.
68.
LambertE. G.HoganN. L.BartonS. M.ElechiO. O. (2009). The impact of job stress, job involvement, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment on correctional staff support for rehabilitation and punishment. Criminal Justice Studies, 22(2), 109–122.
69.
LambertE. G.WorleyR.WorleyV. B. (2018). The effects of perceptions of staff-inmate boundary violations and willingness to follow rules upon work stress. Security Journal, 31(6), 618–644.
70.
LovellD.CloyesK.AllenD.RhodesL. (2000). Who lives in super-maximum custody? A Washington state study. Federal Probation, 64(2), 33–46.
71.
LovellD.JohnsonL. C.CainK. C. (2007). Recidivism of supermax prisoners in Washington State. Crime & Delinquency, 53(4), 633–656.
72.
LucasJ.JonesM. (2019). An analysis of the deterrent effects of disciplinary segregation on institutional rule violation rates. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(5), 765–787.
73.
MaeveM. K. (1999). The social construction of love and sexuality in a women’s prison. Advances in Nursing Science, 21(3), 46–65.
74.
MahanS. (1984). Imposition of despair: An ethnography of women in prison. Justice Quarterly, 1(3), 357–383.
75.
MartelJ. (2001). Telling the story: A study in the segregation of women prisoners. Social Justice, 28(1), 196–215.
76.
McClellanD. S.FarabeeD.CrouchB. M. (1997). Early victimization, drug use, and criminality: A comparison of male and female prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24(4), 455–476.
77.
McKelvieS. J. (2013). Are attitude towards capital punishment and right-wing authoritarianism related to capital and non-capital sentencing?Journal of Scientific Psychology, 1, 1–13.
78.
MearsD. P. (2016). Critical research gaps in understanding the effects of prolonged time in restrictive housing on inmates and the institutional environment. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S. (pp. 233–295). National Institute of Justice.
79.
MearsD. P. (2013). Supermax prisons: The policy and the evidence. Criminology and Public Policy, 12(4), 681–719.
80.
MearsD. P.BalesW. D. (2009). Supermax incarceration and recidivism. Criminology, 47(4), 1131–1166.
81.
MearsD. P.CastroJ. L. (2006). Wardens’ views on the wisdom of supermax prisons. Crime and Delinquency, 52(3), 398–431.
82.
MearsD. P.HughesV.PestaG. B.BalesW. D.BrownJ. M.CochranJ. C.WooldredgeJ. (2019). The new solitary confinement? A conceptual framework for guiding and assessing research and policy on “restrictive housing.”Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(10), 1427–1444.
83.
MearsD. P.ReisigM. (2006). The theory and practice of supermax prisons. Punishment & Society, 8(1), 33–57.
84.
MollemanT.LeeuwF. L. (2012). The influence of prison staff on inmate conditions: A multilevel approach to staff and inmate surveys. European Journal of Crime Policy Research, 18(2), 217–233.
85.
MorganR. D.GendreauP.SmithP.GrayA. L.LabrecqueR. M.MacLeanN.Van HornS. A.BolanosA. D.BatastiniA. B.MillsJ. F. (2016). Quantitative synthesis of the effects of administrative segregation on inmates’ well-being. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(4), 439–461.
86.
MorrisR. G. (2016). Exploring the effect of exposure to short-term solitary confinement among violent prison inmates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32, 1–22.
87.
O’KeefeM. L.KlebeK. J.MetzerJ.DvoskinJ.FellnerJ.StuckerA. (2013). A longitudinal study of administrative segregation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 41(1), 49–60.
88.
OwenB. A. (1998). In the mix: Struggle and survival in a women’s prison. SUNY Press.
89.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage.
90.
PollackS. (2005). Taming the shrew: Regulating prisoners through women-centered mental health programming. Critical Criminology, 13(1), 71–87.
91.
PrattT. (2019). Addicted to incarceration: Corrections policy and the politics of misinformation in the United States (2nd ed.). Sage.
92.
PropperA. M. (1982). Make-believe families and homosexuality among imprisoned girls. Criminology, 20(1), 127–138.
93.
PyroozD. (2016). Gang affiliation and restrictive housing in U.S. prisons. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S. (117–164). National Institute of Justice.
94.
ReisigM. D.HoltfreterK.MorashM. (2006). Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime. Justice Quarterly, 23(3), 384–405.
95.
ReiterK. A. (2012). The most restrictive alternative: A litigation history of solitary confinement in U.S. prisons, 1960–2006. In Studies in Law, Politics and Society. (pp. 71–124). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
96.
ReiterK. A. (2016). 23/7: Pelican Bay Prison and the rise of long-term solitary confinement. Yale University Press.
97.
RhodesL. A. (2004). Total confinement: Madness and reason in the maximum security prison. University of California Press.
98.
RivelandC. (1999). Supermax prisons: Overview and general considerations. National Institute of Corrections.
99.
SalisburyE. J.Van VoorhisP. (2009). Gendered pathways: A quantitative investigation of women probationers’ paths to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 541–566.
100.
SeredS. S.Norton-HawkM. (2019). Women on the institutional circuit: A 9-year qualitative study. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 25(1), 25–36.
101.
SeveranceT. A. (2004). Concerns and coping strategies of women inmates concerning release: “It’s going to take somebody in my corner.”Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 38(4), 73–97.
102.
SeveranceT. A. (2005). “You know who you can go to”: Cooperation and exchange between incarcerated women. The Prison Journal, 85(3), 343–367.
103.
ShalevS. (2014). Solitary confinement as a prison health issue. In EnggistS.MollerL.GaleaG.UdesenC. (Eds.), Prisons and health (pp. 27–35). World Health Organization.
104.
SiennickS. E.MearsD. P.BalesW. (2013). Here and gone: Anticipation and separation effects of prison visits on inmate infractions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(3), 417–444.
105.
SimonJ. (2000). The “society of captives” in the era of hyper-incarceration. Theoretical Criminology, 4(3), 285–308.
106.
SimonJ. (2014). Mass incarceration on trial: A remarkable court decision and the future of prison in America. The New Press.
107.
SparksR.BottomsA. E.HayW. (1996). Prisons and the problem of order. Oxford University Press.
108.
SteffensmeierD.AllanE. (1996). Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 459–487.
109.
SteinerB. (2009). Assessing static and dynamic influences on inmate violence levels. Crime and Delinquency, 55(1), 134–161.
110.
SteinerB.WooldredgeJ. (2009). Individual and environmental effects on assaults and nonviolent rule breaking by women in prison. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46(4), 437–467.
SundtJ. L.CastellanoT. C.BriggsC. S. (2008). The sociopolitical context of prison violence and its control: A case study of supermax and its effect in Illinois. The Prison Journal, 88(1), 94–122.
113.
TochH. (2003). The contemporary relevance of early experiments with supermax reform. The Prison Journal, 83(2), 221–228.
114.
Van VoorhisP.WrightE. M.SalisburyE.BaumanA. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contribution to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of a gender-responsive supplement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(3), 261–288.
115.
WaltersG. (2018). Checking the math: Do restrictive housing and mental health need add up to psychological deterioration?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(9), 1347–1362.
116.
WardD. A.KassebaumG. G. (1965). Women’s prison: Sex and social structure. New Transaction.
117.
WardD. A.WerlichT. G. (2003). Alcatraz and Marion: Evaluating super-maximum custody. Punishment and Society, 5(1), 53–75.
118.
WattanapornK.HoltfreterK. (2014). The impacts of feminist pathways research on gender-responsive policy and practice. Feminist Criminology, 9(3), 191–207.
119.
WooldredgeJ.SteinerB. (2015). A macro-level perspective on prison inmate deviance. Punishment and Society, 17(2), 230–257.
120.
WrightE. M.Van VoorhisP.SalisburyE.BaumanA. (2012). Gender-responsive lessons learned and policy implications for women in prison: A review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(12), 1612–1632.
121.
Wulf-LuddenT. (2013). Interpersonal relationships among inmates and prison violence. Journal of Crime and Justice, 36(1), 116–136.
122.
Wulf-LuddenT. (2016). Pseudofamilies, misconduct, and the utility of general strain theory in women’s prison. Women and Criminal Justice, 26(4), 233–259.
