Prior literature suggests that drug legislation in the late 1970s and 1980s caused the rapid increase in the female incarceration rate. Empirical investigations focused on the female incarceration rate specifically may provide important information to further our understanding of the factors that contributed to this increase. The purpose of this study is to determine how much of the change in the female incarceration rate in New York can be attributed to the introduction of the 1973 Rockefeller Drug Laws. These laws were introduced prior to most war on drugs legislation and, therefore, serve as a unique case study for this type of investigation.
AlbonettiC. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/800532
3.
AlexanderM. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New Press.
4.
AlleyneV. (2006). Locked up means locked out: Women, addiction and incarceration. Women & Therapy, 29(3–4), 181–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J015v29n03_10
5.
AndersonE. A. (1976). The “Chivalrous” treatment of the female offender in the arms of the criminal justice system: A review of the literature. Social Problems, 23(3), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.2307/799780
6.
Association of the Bar of the City of New York. (1978). The nation’s toughest drug law: Evaluating the New York experience. Government Printing Office.
7.
AuerhahnK. (1999). The split labor market and the origins of the anti-drug legislation in the United States. Law and Society Inquiry, 24(2), 411–440.
8.
BirdJ. P.EversmanM. H. (2017). Moral panic and social justice: A guide for analyzing social problems. Social Work, 62(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/sww068
9.
BlankR. M. (1997). Policy watch: The 1996 welfare reform. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 169–177.
10.
BridgesG. S.SteenS. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63(4), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657267
11.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (n.d.) Publications and products: Prisoners. United States Department of Justice: Office of Justice Programs. https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbo
12.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2018). (Count of total jurisdiction population). Generated using the Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool (CSAT) - Prisoners at www.bjs.gov
Chesney-LindM. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women and crime. Sage.
15.
CollinsP. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
16.
CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues or field settings. Rand McNally.
17.
Division of Criminal Justice Services. (2010). New York State felony drug arrest, indictment and commitment trends, 1973-2008. Division of Criminal Justice Research Services, Office of Justice Research and Performance.
18.
EdwardsW. C. (1989). An overview of the Comprehensive Drug Reform Act of 1987. Seton Hall Legislative Journal, 5, 5–6.
19.
EmbryR.LyonsP. M. (2012). Sex-based sentencing: Sentencing discrepancies between male and female sex offenders. Feminist Criminology, 7(2), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085111430214
20.
FortnerM. (2015). Black silent majority: The Rockefeller drug laws and the politics of punishment. Harvard University Press.
21.
FreiburgerT. L. (2010). The effects of gender, family status, and race on sentencing decisions. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28(3), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.901
22.
GoldsteinP. J.BrownsteinH. H.RyanP. J.BellucciP. A. (1989). Crack and homicide in New York City 1988: Conceptually based event analysis. Contemporary Drug Problems, 16(4), 651–688.
23.
GreenfieldL. A.SnellT. L. (1999). Women offenders (NCJ 175688). Bureau of Justice Statistics.
24.
JohnsonB. D.WilliamsT.DeiK. A.SanabriaH. (1990). Drug abuse in the inner city: Impact on hard-drug users and the community. Crime and Justice, 13, 9–67.
25.
JohnsonM. S. (2013). Strength and respectability: Black women’s negotiation of racialized gender ideals and the role of daughter-father relationships. Gender and Society, 27(6), 889–912.
26.
HartmanD. M.GolubA. (1999). The social construction of the crack epidemic in the print media. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 31(4), 423–433.
27.
HicksC. (2003). “In danger of becoming morally depraved”: Single black women, working-class black families, and New York State’s wayward minor laws, 1917-1928. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151(6), 2077. https://doi.org/10.2307/3313025
28.
HobbsF.StoopsN. (2002). Demographic trends in the 20th century: Census 2000 Special Reports. Government Printing Office.
29.
Kohler-HausmannJ. (2010). The Attila the Hun law: New York’s Rockefeller drug laws and the making of a punitive state. Journal of Social History, 44(1), 71–95.
30.
Koons-WittB. A. (2002). The effect of gender on the decision to incarcerate before and after the introduction of sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40(2), 297–328.
31.
MancusoP. A. (2010). Resentencing after the “fall” of Rockefeller: The failure of the drug law reform acts of 2004 and 2005 to remedy the injustices of New York’s Rockefeller drug laws and the compromise of 2009. Albany Law Review, 73(4), 1535–1581.
32.
MartinsonR. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35, 22–54.
33.
Massachusetts Sentencing Commission. (2000). Survey of sentencing practices: Truth-in-sentencing reform in Massachusetts. The Commission.
34.
McDowallD.McClearyR.BartosB. J. (2019). Interrupted time series analysis. Oxford University Press.
35.
McMahonM. (1990). “Net-widening”: Vagaries in the use of a concept. The British Journal of Criminology, 30(2), 121–149.
36.
McMahonM. G.O’BrienR. M. (2011). Gendered arrests or gendered sentencing: Explaining the narrowing of the gender gap in imprisonment over time: 1970-2008. Sociological Perspectives, 54(4), 641–664. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2011.54.4.641
37.
MouldsE. (1978). Chivalry and paternalism: Disparities of treatment in the criminal justice system. The Western Political Quarterly, 31(3), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.2307/447741
OslerM. (2013). Learning from crack. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 10(2), 671–684.
40.
PfaffJ. F. (2015). The war on drugs and prison growth: Limited importance, limited legislative options. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 52(1), 173–220.
41.
RadoshP. F. (2002). Reflections on women’s crime and mothers in prison: A peacemaking approach. Crime and Delinquency, 48(2), 300–315.
42.
RyonS. B. (2013). Gender as a social threat: A study of offender sex, situational factors, gender dynamics and social control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(6), 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.07.006
43.
SaccoL. N. (2014). Drug enforcement in the United States: History, policy, and trends. Journal of Drug Addiction, Education, and Eradication, 10(4), 415–441.
44.
SarreR. (2001). Beyond ‘what works?’ A 25-year jubilee retrospective of Robert Martinson’s famous article. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 34(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/000486580103400103
45.
SchneiderE. C. (2013). Smack heroin and the American city. University of Pennsylvania Press.
46.
SharpS. F.BraleyA.Marcus-MendozaS. (2000). Focal concerns, race and sentencing of females. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 28(2), 3–16.
47.
SteffensmeierD. (1993). National trends in female arrests, 1960–1990: Assessment and recommendations for research. Journal of Qualitative Criminology, 9(4), 411–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064111
48.
SteffensmeierD.AllanE. (1996). Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 459–487. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.459
49.
SteffensmeierD.KramerJ.StreifelC. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31(3), 411–446.
50.
SteffensmeierD.Painter-DavisN.UlmerJ. (2017). Intersectionality of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on criminal punishment. Sociological Perspectives, 60(4), 810–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121416679371
51.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x
52.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
53.
TsimbinosS. A. (1999). Is it time to change the Rockefeller drug laws?Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development, 13, 613.
WacquantL. (2009). Prisons of poverty. University of Minnesota Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
