Much of the prior court literature has demonstrated gender and racial disparity exist across various decision-points. Less understood are the processes that produce this disparity, particularly in problem-solving courts. This article utilizes 100 observations of probation review hearings in three domestic violence courts to examine how judges, probation agents, attorneys, and probationers construct a probationer’s non-compliance. Using a critical discourse analysis approach, the author examined how probationers and their actions are constructed based upon gender and racial discourses. Gender differences in parenting responsibilities, mental health, and domestic violence discourses emerged, with racial differences in responsibility and mental health discourses.
AlbonettiC. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social problems, 38(2), 247–266.
2.
AlexanderM. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.
3.
BaumerE. P. (2013). Reassessing and redirecting research on race and sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 30(2), 231–261.
4.
BlumerH. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Prentice-Hall.
5.
BlunterH. (1994). Society as symbolic interaction. In HermanN. J.ReynoldsL. T. (Eds.), Symbolic interaction: An introduction to social psychology (pp. 263–265). General Hall.
6.
BondC. E.JeffriesS. (2010). Sentencing Indigenous and non-Indigenous women in Western Australia’s higher courts. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 17(1), 70–78.
7.
BrezinaT.WinderK. (2003). Economic disadvantage, status generalization, and negative racial stereotyping by white Americans. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(4), 402–418.
8.
CesarioJ.PlaksJ. E.HagiwaraN.NavarreteC. D.HigginsE. T. (2010). The ecology of automaticity: How situational contingencies shape action semantics and social behavior. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1311–1317.
9.
ChaemsaithongK. (2018). Referential practice and contested identities in legal narratives. Lingua, 212, 44–59.
10.
ConleyJ. M.O’BarrW. M. (2005). Just words: Law, language, and power. University of Chicago Press.
11.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1279.
12.
DalyK. (1987a). Structure and practice of familial-based justice in a criminal court. Law and Society Review, 21(2), 267–290.
13.
DalyK. (1987b). Discrimination in the criminal courts: Family, gender, and the problem of equal treatment. Social Forces, 66(1), 152–175.
14.
DalyK.BouhoursB. (2008). Judicial censure and moral communication to youth sex offenders. Justice Quarterly, 25(3), 496–522.
15.
DasguptaS. D. (2002). A framework for understanding women’s use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1364–1389.
16.
FaircloughN. (1993). Discourse and social change. Polity.
17.
FarnworthM.TeskeR. H.Jr. (1995). Gender differences in felony court processing: Three hypotheses of disparity. Women & Criminal Justice, 6(2), 23–44.
18.
FeeleyM. (1979). The process is the punishment. Russell Sage Foundation.
19.
FeldmeyerB.UlmerJ. T. (2011). Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(2), 238–270.
20.
FeldmeyerB.WarrenP. Y.SiennickS. E.NeptuneM. (2015). Racial, ethnic, and immigrant threat: Is there a new criminal threat on state sentencing?. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 62–92.
21.
FerberA. L. (2007). The construction of Black masculinity: White supremacy now and then. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 31(1), 11–24.
22.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon.
23.
FrohmannL. (1991). Discrediting victims’ allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems, 38(2), 213–226.
24.
FrohmannL. (1997). Convictability and discordant locales: Reproducing race, class, and gender ideologies in prosecutorial decisionmaking. Law & Society Review, 31(3), 531–556.
25.
FrohmannL. (1998). Constituting power in sexual assault cases: Prosecutorial strategies for victim management. Social Problems, 45(3), 393–407.
26.
GathingsM. J.ParrottaK. (2013). The use of gendered narratives in the courtroom constructing an identity worthy of leniency. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 42(6), 668–689.
27.
GilbertP. R. (2002). Discourses of female violence and societal gender stereotypes. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1271–1300.
28.
GoffmanE. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
29.
GoughJ.EisenschitzA.McCullochA. (2006). Spaces of social exclusion. Routledge.
30.
GrayG. C.SaloneA. T. (2006). The local culture of punishment: An ethnography of criminal justice worker discourse. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 661–679.
31.
HauserW.PeckJ. H. (2017). The intersection of crime seriousness, discretion, and race: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 34(1), 166–192.
32.
HealeyK.SmithC.O’SullivanC. S. (1998). Batterer intervention: Program approaches and criminal justice strategies. US Department of Justice.
33.
HeitzegN. A. (2015). “Whiteness,” criminality, and the double standards of deviance/social control. Contemporary Justice Review, 18(2), 197–214.
34.
HolleranD.SpohnC. (2004). On the use of the total incarceration variable in sentencing research. Criminology, 42(1), 211–240.
35.
JacksonP. (2001). Making sense of qualitative data. In CoffeyA.AtkinsonP. (Eds.), Qualitative methodologies for geographers: Issues and debates (2nd ed., pp. 199–214). Sage.
36.
JacksonS. M.HillardA. L.SchneiderT. R. (2014). Using implicit bias training to improve attitudes toward women in STEM. Social Psychology of Education, 17(3), 419–438.
37.
JeffriesS.BondC. E. (2013). Does a therapeutic court context matter?: The likelihood of imprisonment for Indigenous and non-Indigenous offenders sentenced in problem-solving courts. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 41(1), 100–114.
38.
JohnsonM. P. (2005). Apples and oranges in child custody disputes: Intimate terrorism vs. situational couple violence. Journal of Child Custody, 2(4), 43–52.
39.
KleinA. R. (2009). Practical implications of current domestic violence research: For law enforcement, prosecutors and judges. Department of Justice.
40.
KruttschnittC.Carbone-LopezK. (2006). Moving beyond the stereotypes: Women’s subjective accounts of their violent crime. Criminology, 44(2), 321–352.
41.
LabriolaM.BradleyS.O’SullivanC. S.RempelM.MooreS. (2010a). A national portrait of domestic violence courts. Center for Court Innovation.
42.
LabriolaM.O’SullivanC.FrankP. B.RempelM. (2010b). Court responses to batterer program noncompliance: A national survey. Judicature, 94(2), 81–84.
43.
Lara-MillánA.Van CleveN. G. (2017). Interorganizational utility of welfare stigma in the criminal justice system. Criminology, 55(1), 59–84.
44.
LucasP. A.HanrahanK. J. (2016). No soldier left behind: The veterans court solution. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 45, 52–59.
45.
MannM.MenihH.SmithC. (2014). There is “hope for you yet”: The female drug offender in sentencing discourse. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 47(3), 355–373.
46.
MerryS. E. (1990). The discourses of mediation and the power of naming. Yale Journal of Law & Humanities, 2(1), 1–36.
47.
MirchandaniR. (2006). “Hitting is not manly”: Domestic violence court and the re-imagination of the patriarchal state. Gender & Society, 20(6), 781–804.
48.
MoralesE. M. (2014). Intersectional impact: Black students and race, gender and class microaggressions in higher education. Race, Gender & Class, 21(3/4), 48–66.
49.
NardulliP. F.EisensteinJ.FlemmingR. B. (1988). The contours of justice: Communities and their courts. Little, Brown and Co.
50.
RachlinskiJ. J.JohnsonS. L.WistrichA. J.GuthrieC. (2009). Does unconscious racial bias affect trial judges?. Notre Dame Law Review, 84(3), 9–11.
51.
RayB.DollarC. B. (2013). Examining mental health court completion: A focal concerns perspective. The Sociological Quarterly, 54(4), 647–669.
52.
RidgewayC. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford University Press.
53.
RomainD. M.FreiburgerT. L. (2016). Chivalry revisited: Gender, race/ethnicity, and offense type on domestic violence charge reduction. Feminist Criminology, 11(2), 191–222.
54.
RussellK. K. (1998). The color of crime. New York University Press.
55.
SchwartzM. D.DeKeseredyW. S. (2008). Interpersonal violence against women: The role of men. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24(2), 178–185.
56.
SmartC. (1995). Law, crime and sexuality: Essays in feminism. Sage.
57.
SmithR. J. (2015). Reducing racially disparate policing outcomes: Is implicit bias training the answer. Harvard Law Review, 37, 295–535.
58.
SnowD. A. (2001). Extending and broadening Blumer’s conceptualization of symbolic interactionism. Symbolic Interaction, 24(3), 367–377.
59.
SpohnC. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice, 3, 427–501.
60.
SpohnC. C.KimB.BelenkoS.BrennanP. K. (2014). The direct and indirect effects of offender drug use on federal sentencing outcomes. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(3), 549–576.
SteffensmeierD.KramerJ.StreifelC. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31(3), 411–446.
63.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). Interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–797.
64.
SudnowD. (1965). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. Social Problems, 12(3), 255–276.
65.
ToddA. R.ThiemK. C.NeelR. (2016). Does seeing faces of young black boys facilitate the identification of threatening stimuli?. Psychological Science, 27(3), 384–393.
66.
TraversM. (2007). Sentencing in the children’s court: An ethnographic perspective. Youth Justice, 7(1), 21–35.
67.
UlmerJ. T. (1997). Social worlds of sentencing: Court communities under sentencing guidelines. SUNY Press.
68.
UlmerJ. T. (2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29(1), 1–40.
69.
UlmerJ.Painter-DavisN.TinikL. (2016). Disproportional imprisonment of Black and Hispanic males: Sentencing discretion, processing outcomes, and policy structures. Justice Quarterly, 33(4), 642–681.
70.
Van CleveN. G. (2016). Crook county: Racism and injustice in America’s largest criminal court. Stanford University Press.
71.
Van DijkT. A. (1996). Discourse, power and access. In Caldas-CoulthardC. R.CoulthardM. (Eds), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 84–104). Routledge.
WaittG. (2010). Doing foucauldian discourse analysis-revealing social realities. In HayI. (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (pp. 217–240). Oxford University Press.
74.
WalkerS. (2011). Sense and nonsense about crime, drugs, and communities: A policy guide. Cengage Learning.
75.
WangX.MearsD. P. (2015). Sentencing and state-level racial and ethnic contexts. Law & Society Review, 49(4), 883–915.
76.
WorrallA. (1990). Offending women: Female lawbreakers and the criminal justice system. Routledge.
77.
WorrallJ. L. (2008). Prosecutors in problem solving courts. In WorrallJ.Nugent-BorakoveM. E. (Eds), The changing role of the American prosecutor (pp. 231–244). State University of New York Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
