Doing the “Right Thing”? Understanding Why Rape Victim-Survivors Report to the Police

Abstract

This article explores why victim-survivors engage with the police by drawing upon the accounts of 24 women who reported rape or sexual assault in Scotland. Findings defy public narratives around rape reporting, indicating that victim-survivors may exercise limited agency in reporting. Moreover, a problematic “aspiration-reality gap” exists due to stark differences between the aspirations attached to reports and the reality of the ensuing criminal justice response. It is suggested that the concepts of “secondary victimization” and the “justice gap” can be augmented through appreciation of the “aspiration-reality gap,” and contemporary preoccupation with increasing rates of reporting is called into question.

Keywords

rape sexual assault police reporting victim-survivors justice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

(1987). Rape on trial. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Avakame

E. F.

Fyfe

J. J.

McCoy

(1999). Did you call the police? What did they do? An empirical assessment of Black’s theory of mobilization of law. Justice Quarterly, 16, 765-792.

Bachman

(1998). The factors related to rape reporting behavior and arrest: New evidence from the national crime victimization survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 18-29.

Barn

Kumari

(2015). Understanding complainant credibility in rape appeals: A case study of high court judgments and judges’ perspectives in India. The British Journal of Criminology, 55, 435-453.

Black

(1976). The behavior of law. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Bottoms

Roberts

(2010). Hearing the victim: Adversarial justice, crime victims and the State. Cullompton, UK: Willan.

Brooks-Hay

Burman

(2017). Reporting rape: Victim perspectives on advocacy support in the criminal justice process. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 17, 209-225.

Brooks-Hay

Burman

Bradley

Kyle

(2018). Evaluation of the rape crisis Scotland National Advocacy Project: Final report (SCCJR research report). Glasgow, UK: Scottish Centre for Crime & Justice Research.

Brooks-Hay

Burman

Kyle

(2015). Evaluation of support to report pilot advocacy service: Summary report (SCCJR Briefing Paper, No. 1/2015). Glasgow, UK: Scottish Centre for Crime & Justice Research.

10.

Brown

Burman

Jamieson

(1993). Sex crimes on trial: Sexual evidence in the Scottish courts. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

11.

Brown

(2011). We mind and we care but have things changed? Assessment of progress in reporting, investigating and prosecution of rape. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17, 263-272.

12.

Brubaker

S. J.

(2019). Campus-based sexual assault victim advocacy and title IX: Revisiting tensions between grassroots activism and the criminal justice system. Feminist Criminology, 14, 307-329.

13.

Burman

Brooks-Hay

(2018, March 8). Victims are more willing to report rape, so why are conviction rates still woeful? Conversation. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/victims-are-more-willing-to-report-rape-so-why-are-conviction-rates-still-woeful-92968

14.

Clay-Warner

McMahon-Howard

(2009). Rape reporting: “Classic Rape” and the behavior of law. Violence and Victims, 24, 723-743.

15.

Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. (2018). COPFS revised policy on dealing with reluctant complainers in cases of rape and other serious sexual offending. Edinburgh, UK: Author.

16.

Daly

Bouhours

(2010). Rape and attrition in the legal process: A comparative analysis of five countries. Crime and Justice, 39, 565-650.

17.

Demers

J. M.

Roberts

A. P.

Bennett

Banyard

V. L.

(2017). Victim motivations for disclosing unwanted sexual experiences and partner abuse. Affilia, 32, 327-343.

18.

DuMont

Miller

K. L.

Myhr

T.L

. (2003) The role of “real rape” and “real victim” stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9, 466-486.

19.

Ellison

Munro

V. E.

(2009). Of “normal sex” and ‘real rape’: Exploring the use of socio-sexual scripts in (mock) jury deliberation. Social & Legal Studies, 18, 291-312.

20.

Estrich

(1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

21.

Feldman-Summers

Ashworth

C. D.

(1981). Factors related to intentions to report a rape. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 53-70.

22.

Fisher

B. S.

Daigle

L. E.

Cullen

F. T.

Turner

M. G.

(2003). Reporting sexual victimization to the police and others: Results from a national-level study of college women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 6-38.

23.

Gartner

Macmillan

(1995). The effect of victim-offender relationship on reporting crimes of violence against women. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 393-429.

24.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

25.

Goudriaan

(2006). Reporting crime: Effects of social context on the decision of victims to notify the police (Doctoral thesis, Universal Press, Veenendaal, The Netherlands). Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/4410

26.

Griffiths

Hanmer

(2005). Feminist quantitative methodology: Evaluating policing of domestic violence. In Skinner

Hester

Malos

(Eds.), Researching gender violence: Feminist methodology in action (pp. 23-43). Cullompton, UK: Willan.

27.

Herman

J. L.

(2005). Justice from the victim’s perspective. Violence Against Women, 11, 571-602.

28.

Hirschel

Hutchison

(2003). The voices of domestic violence victims: Predictors of victim preference for arrest and the relationship between preference for arrest and re-victimization. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 313-336.

29.

Hlavka

H. R.

(2014). Normalizing sexual violence: Young women account for harassment and abuse. Gender & Society, 28, 337-358.

30.

Hohl

Stanko

(2015). Complaints of rape and the criminal justice system: Fresh evidence on the attrition problem in England and Wales. European Journal of Criminology, 12, 324-341.

31.

Holder

R. L.

Daly

(2018). Sequencing justice: A longitudinal study of justice goals of domestic violence victims. The British Journal of Criminology, 58, 787-804.

32.

Hoyle

Sanders

(2000). Police response to domestic violence. The British Journal of Criminology, 40, 14-36.

33.

Jordan

. (2001). Worlds apart? Women, rape and the police reporting process. The British Journal of Criminology, 41, 679-706.

34.

Jordan

(2004). Beyond Belief? Police, rape and women’s credibility. Criminal Justice, 4, 129-159.

35.

Kelly

(2002). A research review on the reporting, investigation and prosecution of rape cases. London, England: Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate.

36.

Kelly

(2010). The (in)credible words of women: False allegations in European rape research. Violence Against Women, 16, 1345-1355.

37.

Kelly

Lovett

Regan

(2005). A gap or chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases. London, England: Home Office.

38.

Kilpatrick

D. G.

Resnick

H. S.

Ruggiero

K. J.

Conoscenti

L. M.

McCauley

(2007). Drug facilitated, incapacitated, and forcible rape: A national study (NIJ Report. 2005-WGBX0006). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

39.

Konradi

(2007). Taking the stand: Rape survivors and the prosecution of rapists. Westport, CT: Praeger.

40.

Lewis

Dobash

R. P.

Dobash

R. E.

(2000). Protection, prevention, rehabilitation or justice? Women’s use of the law to challenge domestic violence. International Review of Victimology, 7, 179-205.

41.

Lievore

(2005). No longer silent: A study of women’s help-seeking decisions and service responses to sexual assault. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Family and Community Services.

42.

Lisak

Gardinier

Nicksa

S. C.

Cote

A. M.

(2010). False allegations of sexual assault: An analysis of ten years of reported cases. Violence Against Women, 16, 1318-1334.

43.

Lizotte

(1985). The uniqueness of rape: Reporting assaultive violence to the police. Crime & Delinquency, 31, 169-190.

44.

McGlynn

(2011). Feminism, rape and the search for justice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 31, 825-842.

45.

McGlynn

Downes

Westmarland

(2016). Seeking justice for survivors of sexual violence: Recognition, voice and consequences. In Zinsstag

Keenan

(Eds.), Sexual violence and restorative justice: Legal, social and therapeutic dimensions (pp. 179-191). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

46.

McMillan

(2015). The role of the specially trained officer in sexual offence cases. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 25, 622-640.

47.

Ménard

K. S.

(2003). Sexual victimization reporting: The effects of individual and county factors on victims’ decision to report to the police (Doctoral dissertation, College of the Liberal Arts, The Pennsylvania State University). Retrieved from https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/files/final_submissions/3500

48.

Miller

S. L

. (2011). After the crime: The power of restorative justice dialogues between victims and violent offenders. New York Uinversity Press.

49.

Moore

Baker

(2018). An exploratory examination of college students’ likelihood of reporting sexual assault to police and university officials: Results of a self-report survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 3419-3438.

50.

Mulvihill

Gangoli

Gill

A. K.

Hester

(2019). The experience of interactional justice for victims of ‘honour’-based violence and abuse reporting to the police in England and Wales. Policing and Society, 29, 640-656. doi:10.1080/10439463.2018.1427745

51.

Novisky

Peralta

(2015). When women tell: Intimate partner violence and the factors related to police notification. Violence Against Women, 21, 65-86.

52.

Patterson

Campbell

(2010). Why rape survivors participate in the criminal justice system. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 191-205.

53.

Pino

Meier

(1999). Gender differences in rape reporting. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 40, 979-990.

54.

Reinharz

(1992). Feminist methods in social research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

55.

Ritchie

Spencer

O’Connor

(2003). Carrying out qualitative analysis. In Ritchie

Lewis

(Eds.), qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 220-262). London, England: Sage.

56.

Sabina

L. Y.

(2014). Campus and college victim responses to sexual assault and dating violence: Disclosure, service utilization, and service provision. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15, 201-226.

57.

Schuck

A. M.

(2018). Women in policing and the response to rape: Representative bureaucracy and organizational change. Feminist Criminology, 13, 237-259.

58.

Scottish Government. (2016). Equally safe: Scotland’s strategy for preventing and eradicating violence against women and girls. Edinburgh, UK: Author.

59.

Scottish Government. (2019). Criminal proceedings in Scotland, 2017-18. Edinburgh, UK: Author.

60.

Skinner

Hester

Malos

(2005). Researching gender violence: Feminist methodology in action. Cullompton, UK: Willan.

61.

Smith

Skinner

(2012). Observing court responses to victims of rape and sexual assault. Feminist Criminology, 7, 298-326.

62.

Stanley

Wise

(1993). Breaking out again. London, England: Routledge.

63.

Strauss

A. L

. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

64.

Tarling

Morris

(2010). Reporting crime to the police. The British Journal of Criminology, 50, 474-490.

65.

Taylor

C. S.

Norma

(2012). The “symbolic protest” women’s reporting of sexual assault crime to the police. Feminist Criminology, 7, 24-47.

66.

Temkin

Krahé

(2008). Sexual assault and the justice gap: A question of attitude. Oxford, UK: Hart.

67.

Tolsma

Blaauw

Te Grotenhuis

(2012). When do people report crime to the police? Results from a factorial survey design in the Netherlands, 2010. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8, 117-134.

68.

Ullman

S. E.

(2010). Talking about sexual assault: Society’s response to survivors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

69.

Wahidin

Carr

(2013). Understanding criminal justice: A critical introduction. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

70.

Walklate

(2008). What is to be done about violence against women? Gender, violence, cosmopolitanism and the Law. The British Journal of Criminology, 48, 39-54.

71.

Weiss

K. G.

(2010). Too ashamed to report: Deconstructing the shame of sexual victimization. Feminist Criminology, 5, 286-310.

72.

Weiss

K. G.

(2011). Neutralizing sexual victimization: A typology of victims’ non-reporting accounts. Theoretical Criminology, 15, 445-467.

73.

Westmarland

Aznarez

Brown

Kirkham

(2012). The benefits of specialist rape teams: A report commissioned and funded by the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). Durham, UK: Durham University.

74.

Williams

L. S.

(1984). The classic rape: When do victims report? Social Problems, 31, 459-467.