An International Study of the Contextual Effects of Gender Inequality on Intimate Partner Sexual Violence Against Women Students

Abstract

Rejecting biological and essentialist explanations, feminist scholars posit that gender inequality is a driving force behind sexual violence against women. Using an ecological approach, I test for significant associations between national-level gender inequality and intimate partner sexual violence (IPSV). I use multi-level generalized linear modeling to analyze the responses of 9,126 women from 29 countries in the International Dating Violence Study. I find that while controlling for other risk factors, gender inequality is significantly associated with increased odds of having experienced severe, but not minor, forms of IPSV.

Keywords

intimate partner violence cross-national comparative sexual assault rape quantitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin

R. L.

Kim

Y. S.

(2000). A cross-national examination of the relationship between gender equality and official rape rates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 204-221.

Black

M. C.

Basile

K. C.

Breiding

M. J.

Smith

S. G.

Walters

M. L.

Merrick

M. T.

. . . Stevens

M. R.

(2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_executive_summary-a.pdf

Brownmiller

(1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Central Intelligence Agency. (n.d.). The world factbook: Field listing: Distribution of family income—GINI index. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/223.html

Chesney-Lind

Morash

(2013). Transformative feminist criminology: A critical re-thinking of a discipline. Critical Criminology, 21, 287-304. doi:10.1007/s10612-013-9187-2

Chon

D. S.

(2013). Test of impacts of gender equality and economic development on sexual violence. Journal of Family Violence, 28, 603-610. doi:10.1007/s10896-013-9523-z

Chrisler

J. C.

Ferguson

(2006). Violence against women as a public health issue. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087, 235-249. doi:10.1196/annals.1385.009

Daly

Chesney-Lind

(1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5, 497-538.

Dank

Lachman

Zweig

J. M.

Yahner

(2014). Dating violence experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 846-857. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9975-8

10.

DeVellis

R. F.

(2003). Scale development: Theory and application (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

11.

Du Mont

Miller

K.-L.

Myhr

T. L

. (2003). The role of “real rape” and “real victim” stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9, 466-486. doi:10.1177/1077801202250960

12.

Fuller

J. R.

Wozniak

J. F.

(2008). Peacemaking criminology: Past, present, and future. In Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (15th ed., pp. 251-273). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

13.

Gelles

R. J.

(1997). Intimate violence in families (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

14.

Graham

J. M.

(2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 930-944. doi:10.1177/0013164406288165

15.

Groves

R. M.

Fowler

F. J.

Jr. Couper

M. P.

Lepkowski

J. M.

Singer

Tourangeau

(2009). Survey methodology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

16.

Heise

L. L.

(1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4, 262-290.

17.

Heise

L. L.

Raikes

Watts

C. H.

Zwi

A. B.

(1994). Violence against women: A neglected public health issue in less developed countries. Social Science & Medicine, 39, 1165-1179.

18.

Himelein

M. J.

(1995). Risk factors for sexual victimization in dating: A longitudinal study of college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 31-48.

19.

Hoffman

J. P.

(2004). Generalized linear models: An applied approach. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

20.

Kenyon

C. R.

Buyze

(2015). No association between gender inequality and peak HIV prevalence in developing countries—An ecological study. AIDS Care, 27, 150-159.

21.

Kimmel

M. S.

(2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8, 1332-1363. doi:10.1177/107780102237407

22.

Koss

M. P.

Dinero

T. E.

(1989). Discriminant analysis of risk factors for sexual victimization among a national sample of college women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 242-250.

23.

Lanier

Maume

M. O.

(2009). Intimate partner violence and social isolation across the rural/urban divide. Violence Against Women, 15, 1311-1330. doi:10.1177/1077801209346711

24.

Leen

Sorbring

Mawer

Holdsworth

Helsing

Bowen

(2013). Prevalence, dynamic risk factors and the efficacy of primary interventions for adolescent dating violence: An international review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 159-174. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.015

25.

Lynch

M. J.

Schwendinger

(2008). The status of empirical research in radical criminology. In Cullen

F. T.

Wright

J. P.

Blevins

K. R.

(Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (15th ed., pp. 191-215). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

26.

Maxfield

M. G.

Weiler

B. L.

Widom

C. S.

(2000). Comparing self-reports and official records of arrests. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 87-110.

27.

Muehlenhard

C. L.

Linton

M. A.

(1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186-196.

28.

Page

A. D.

(2008). Gateway to reform? Policy implications of police officers’ attitudes toward rape. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 44-58. doi:10.1007/s12103-007-9024-9

29.

Papadakaki

Tzamalouka

G. S.

Chatzifotiou

Chliaoutakis

(2008). Seeking for risk factors of intimate partner violence (IPV) in a Greek national sample: The role of self-esteem. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 732-750. doi:10.1177/0886260508317181

30.

Permanyer

(2010). The measurement of multidimensional gender inequality: Continuing the debate. Social Indicators Research, 95, 181-198. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9463-4

31.

Permanyer

(2013a). Are UNDP indices appropriate to capture gender inequalities in Europe? Social Indicators Research, 110, 927-950. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9975-6

32.

Permanyer

(2013b). A critical assessment of the UNDP’s gender inequality index. Feminist Economics, 19(2), 1-32. doi:10.1080/13545701.2013.769687

33.

Peterson

R. D.

Bailey

W. C.

(1992). Rape and dimensions of gender socioeconomic inequality in U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 162-177.

34.

Peterson

R. D.

Krivo

L. J.

(2005). Macrostructural analyses of race, ethnicity, and violent crime: Recent lessons and new directions for research. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 331-356. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122308

35.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

36.

Renner

L. M.

Whitney

S. D.

(2012). Risk factors for unidirectional and bidirectional intimate partner violence among young adults. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36, 40-52. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.07.007

37.

Rozée

P. D.

(1993). Forbidden or forgiven? Rape in cross-cultural perspective. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 499-514.

38.

Russell

D. E. H.

(1975). The politics of rape: The victim’s perspective. New York, NY: Stein and Day.

39.

Russo

N. F.

Pirlott

(2006). Gender-based violence: Concepts, methods, and findings. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087, 178-205. doi:10.1196/annals.1385.024

40.

Sanday

P. R.

(1981). The socio-cultural context of rape: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Social Issues, 37(4), 5-27.

41.

Schwendinger

(1983). Rape and inequality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

42.

Smith

M. D.

(2004). Encyclopedia of rape. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

43.

Srivastava

Gour

Bansal

Mishra

Patne

Tiwari

(2014). A cross-sectional study to find out the prevalence of different types of domestic violence in Gwalior City and to identify the various risk and protective factors for domestic violence. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 39, 21-25. doi:10.4103/0970-0218.126348

44.

Stanton

E. A.

(2007). The human development index: A history (Working Paper No. 127). Amherst, MA: Political Economy Research Institute.

45.

Stark

(2012). Looking beyond domestic violence: Policing coercive control. Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations, 12, 199-217. doi:10.1080/15332586.2012.725016

46.

Straus

M. A.

(1969). Phenomenal identity and conceptual equivalence of measurement in cross-national comparative research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 31, 233-239.

47.

Straus

M. A.

(2004). Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women, 10, 790-811. doi:10.1177/1077801204265552

48.

Straus

M. A.

(2009). The national context effect: An empirical test of the validity of cross-national research using unrepresentative samples. Cross-Cultural Research, 43, 183-205. doi:10.1177/1069397109335770

49.

Straus

M. A.

(2011). International dating violence study, 2001-2006. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. doi:10.3886/ICPSR29583.v1

50.

Straus

M. A.

Hamby

S. L.

Boney-McCoy

Sugarman

D. B.

(1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.

51.

Straus

M. A.

Hamby

S. L.

Boney-McCoy

Sugarman

D. B.

(2010). Manual for the Personal and Relationships Profile (PRP). Durham: Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.452.5350&rep=rep1&type=pdf

52.

Straus

M. A.

Mickey

E. L.

(2012). Reliability, validity, and prevalence of partner violence measured by the conflict tactics scales in male-dominant nations. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 463-474. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.004

53.

United Nations Development Programme. (2005). Human development report. United Nations. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR05_complete.pdf

54.

Vicary

J. R.

Klingaman

L. R.

Harkness

W. L.

(1995). Risk factors associated with date rape and sexual assault of adolescent girls. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 289-306.

55.

Vogel

R. E.

Himelein

M. J.

(1995). Dating and sexual victimization: An analysis of risk factors among precollege women. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 153-162.

56.

Watson-Franke

M.-B.

(2002). A world in which women move freely without fear of men: An anthropological perspective on rape. Women’s Studies International Forum, 25, 599-606. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539502003382

57.

Whaley

R. B.

(2001). The paradoxical relationship between gender inequality and rape: Toward a refined theory. Gender & Society, 15, 531-555.

58.

Whaley

R. B.

Messner

S. F.

(2002). Gender equality and gendered homicides. Homicide Studies, 6, 188-210.

59.

Woodlock

(2017). The abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence Against Women, 23, 584-602. doi:10.1177/1077801216646277

60.

The World Bank. (2018). World Development Indicators database. Available from http://data.worldbank.org

61.

The World Bank. (n.d.). GINI index (World Bank estimate). Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI

62.

Wright

B. R. E.

Younts

C. W.

(2009). Reconsidering the relationship between race and crime: Positive and negative predictors of crime among African American youth. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 327-352. doi:10.1177/0022427809335170