The purpose of this study is to evaluate the theory of representative bureaucracy. Cross-sectional and longitudinal data, covering a period from 1997 to 2013, suggest that a greater number of women in the policing workforce is related to higher reporting rates for rape incidents and higher clearance rates for rape cases. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the relationship between female representation and women-centered outcomes is moderated by the presence of a union and mediated by resources for victims and community policing. Looking ahead, more research is needed to identify how female representation in policing influences organizational processes and outcomes for citizens.
AlderdenM.UllmanE. (2012). Gender difference or indifference? Detective decision making in sexual assault cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(1), 3-22.
2.
AlickeM.YurakT. (1995). Perpetrator personality and judgments of acquaintance rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1900-2100.
3.
AllisonP. D. (2012). Logistic regression using SAS: Theory and application (2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
4.
AndersonK.CooperH.OkamuraL. (1997). Individual differences and attitudes toward Rape: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 295-315.
5.
BachmanR. (1998). The factors related to rape reporting behavior and arrest new evidence from the national crime victimization survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25(1), 8-29.
6.
BayleyD. (1994). Police for the future. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
BlackM.C.BasileK.C.BreidingM.J.SmithS.G.WaltersM.L.MerrickM.T.ChenJ.Stevens M.R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
8.
BrownJ.KingJ. (1998). Gender differences in police officers attitudes towards rape: Results of an exploratory study. Psychology, Crime and Law, 4, 265-279.
9.
BybeeD.SullivanC. (2002). The process through which an advocacy intervention resulted in positive change for battered women over time. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 103-132.
10.
CampbellR.RajaS. (1999). Secondary victimization of rape victims: Insights from mental health professionals who treat survivors of violence. Violence and Victims, 14, 261-275.
11.
Coleman-SeldenS. (1998). The promise of representative bureaucracy: Diversity and responsiveness in a government agency. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
12.
DePrinceA.BelknapA.LabusJ. S.BuckinghamS. E.GoverA. R. (2012). The impact of victim-focused outreach on criminal legal system outcomes following police-reported intimate partner abuse. Violence against Women, 18, 861-881.
13.
EpsteinJ.LangenbahnS. (1994). The criminal justice and community response to rape. Collingdale, PA: Diane Publishing.
14.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2002). Uniform crime reporting program data [United States]: Offenses known and clearances by arrest, 2000 (ICPSR03447. v1). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
15.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2005). Uniform crime reporting program data [United States]: Offenses known and clearances by arrest, 2003 (ICPSR04124. v1). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
16.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2009). Uniform crime reporting program data [United States]: Offenses known and clearances by arrest, 2007 (ICPSR25101. v2). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2014b). Uniform crime reporting program data: Offenses known and clearances by arrest, 2012 (ICPSR35021. v1). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
19.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2016). Uniform crime reporting program data [United States]: 1975-1997 (ICPSR09028. v7). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
20.
FiskC.RichardsonL. S. (2017). Police unions. George Washington Law Review, 85, 712-799.
21.
FrazierP.HaneyB. (1996). Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 607-628.
22.
GerberG.CroninJ. M.SteigmanH. J. (2004). Attributions of blame in sexual assault to perpetrators and victims of both genders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2149-2165.
23.
HaarrR. N. (1997). Patterns of interaction in a police patrol bureau: Race and gender barriers to integration. Justice Quarterly, 14(1), 53-85.
24.
HaleM.KellyR. (1989). Gender, democracy, and representative bureaucracies. In HaleM. M.KellyR. M. (Eds.), Gender, bureaucracy, and democracy: Careers and equal opportunity in the public sector (pp. 3-17). New York, NY: Praeger.
25.
JehnK.NorthcraftG.NealeM. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
26.
KeiserL.WilkinsV.MeierK.HollandC. (2002). Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96, 553-564.
27.
KinneyL.BrunsE.BradleyP.DantzlerJ.WeistM. (2008). Sexual assault training of law enforcement officers: Results of a statewide survey. Women & Criminal Justice, 18(3), 81-100.
28.
LonswayK.WelchS.FitzgeraldF. (2001). Police training in sexual assault response process, outcomes, and elements of change. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 695-730.
29.
LordV.RasselG. (2000). Law enforcement’s response to sexual assault: A comparative study of nine counties in North Carolina. Women & Criminal Justice, 11(1), 67-88.
30.
MaltzM. D.TargonskiJ. (2002). A note on the use of county-level UCR data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 297-318.
31.
MartinS. E. (1999). Police force or police service? Gender and emotional labor. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 561, 111-126.
32.
MastrofskiS. D. (2002). The romance of police leadership. In Waring & WeisburdE. (Eds.), Crime & Social Organization (pp. 153-196). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
33.
MastrofskiS. D.WordenR.SnipesJ. (1995). Law enforcement in a time of community policing. Criminology, 33, 539-563.
34.
MeierK. (1993). Representative bureaucracy: A theoretical and empirical exposition. In PerryJ. L. (Ed.) Research in Public Administration (pp. 1-35). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
35.
MeierK.Nicholson-CrottyJ. (2006). Gender, representative bureaucracy, and law enforcement: The case of sexual assault. Public Administration Review, 66, 850-860.
36.
Minnesota Population Center. (2016). National historical geographic information system: Version 11.0 [Database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
37.
MorabitoM. S.PattavinaA.WilliamsL. M. (2017). Active representation and police response to sexual assault complaints. Journal of Crime and Justice, 40, 20-33.
38.
MorabitoS. M. (2010). Understanding community policing as an innovation: Patterns of adoption. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 564-587.
39.
MosherF. (1968). Democracy and the public service. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
MustaineE.TewksburyR.CorzineJ.Huff-CorzineL. (2013). Social disorganization and unfounded sexual assault case clearances. Violence and Victims, 28, 90-102.
41.
OberfieldZ. W. (2014). Becoming bureaucrats: Socialization at the front lines of government service. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
42.
PageA. (2007). Behind the blue line: Investigating police officers’ attitudes toward rape. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 22(1), 22-32.
43.
PitkinH. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
44.
PlantyM.LangtonL.KrebsC.BerzofskyM.Smiley-McDonaldH.LoscoccoK. (2013). Female victims of sexual violence, 1994-2010 (Special Report NCJ. 240655). U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
45.
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Final report of the president’s task force on 21st century policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
46.
Rabe-HempC. (2008). Survival in an “all boys club”: Policewomen and their fight for acceptance. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 31, 251-270.
47.
Rabe-HempC. E. (2009). POLICEwomen or policeWOMEN? Doing gender and police work. Feminist Criminology, 4, 114-129.
48.
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA. (2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
49.
ReavesB. A. (2011). Census of state and local law enforcement agencies, 2008 (NCJ 233982). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Available from https://www.bjs.gov/
50.
RiccucciN. M.Van RyzinG. G.LavenaC. F. (2014). Representative bureaucracy in policing: Does it increase perceived legitimacy?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 537-551.
51.
RosenbaumD.LurigioA. (1994). An inside look at community policing reform: Definitions, organizational changes, and evaluation findings. Crime & Delinquency, 40, 299-314.
52.
SampsonR.RaudenbushS.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
53.
ScheinE. (2003). Organizational socialization and the profession of management. In PorterL. W.AngleH. L.AllenR. W. (Eds.), Organizational influence processes (pp. 283-294). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
54.
SchuckA. M. (2014). Gender differences in policing: Testing hypotheses from the performance and disruption perspectives. Feminist Criminology, 9, 160-185.
55.
SchuckA. M. (2017). Female officers and community policing: Examining the connection between gender diversity and organizational change. Women & Criminal Justice, 27, 341-362.
56.
SchuckA. M.Rabe-HempC. (2016). Citizen complaints and gender diversity in police organisations. Policing and Society, 26, 859-874.
57.
SchuckA. M.Rabe-HempC. (2017). Inequalities regimes in policing: Examining the connection between social exclusion and order maintenance strategies. Race and Justice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2153368716689491
58.
SchullerR.StewartA. (2000). Police responses to sexual assault complaints: The role of perpetrator/complainant intoxication. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 535-551.
59.
ShelleyT. O. C.MorabitoM. S.Tobin-GurleyJ. (2011). Gendered institutions and gender roles: Understanding the experiences of women in policing. Criminal Justice Studies, 24, 351-367.
60.
SilvestriM. (2003). Women in charge: Policing, gender and leadership. Portland, OR: Willan.
61.
SilvestriM. (2015). Gender diversity: Two steps forward, one step back . . . . Policing, 9(1), 56-64.
62.
SklanskyD. (2006). Not your father’s police department: Making sense of the new demographics of law enforcement. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 96, 1209-1243.
63.
SleathE.BullR. (2012). Comparing rape victim and perpetrator blaming in a police officer sample differences between police officers with and without special training. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 646-665.
64.
SpohnC.TellisK. (2012). The criminal justice system’s response to sexual violence. Violence Against women, 18, 169-192.
65.
StataCorp. (2015). Stata statistical software: Release 14. College Station, TX: Author.
66.
SuarezE.GadallaT. (2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 2010-2035.
67.
TabachnickB.FidellL. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.
68.
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (September2016). Table 74: Full-time law enforcement employees, by population group, percent male and female. Crime in the United States, 2015. Retrieved from https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/crime-in-the-u.s.-2015
69.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). American community survey: 2011-2015 ACS 5 year estimates and 2005-2009 ACS 5 Year Estimates (generated by author using American Fact Finder). Available from https://factfinder.census.gov/
70.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2006). Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS): 2003 sample survey of law enforcement agencies (ICPSR04411. v1). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
71.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2008a). Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS): 2000 sample survey of law enforcement agencies (ICPSR03565. v2). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
72.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2008b). Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS): 1997 sample survey of law enforcement agencies (ICPSR02700. v1). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
73.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2011). Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS), 2007 (ICPSR31161. v1). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
74.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2015). Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS), 2013 (ICPSR36164. v2). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
75.
WalfieldS. M. (2016). When a cleared rape is not cleared: A multilevel study of arrest and exceptional clearance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 1767-1792.
76.
WalkerS. (2008). The neglect of police unions: Exploring one of the most important areas of American policing. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 9, 95-112.
77.
WentzE.ArchboldC. (2012). Police perceptions of sexual assault victims exploring the intra-female gender hostility thesis. Police Quarterly, 15(1), 25-44.
