Research suggests that the representation of women’s lethal violence relies on stock narratives that deny women’s femininity or neutralize their culpability. I test those claims by studying media coverage of female-perpetrated intimate partner homicides in Toronto, Canada, from 1975 to 1999. I find that the vast majority of these homicides received little or no media coverage, which I attribute to the circumstances surrounding “normal” killings and the characteristics of the offenders and victims involved in them. “Normal” homicides do not necessarily disrupt or challenge our understanding of femininity or violence, making them less newsworthy or in need of explanation.
AllenH. (1987). Rendering them harmless: The professional portrayal of women charged with serious violent crimes. In CarlenP.WorrallA. (Eds.), Gender, crime and justice (pp. 81-94). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
2.
AltheideD. L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
AuerhahnK. (2007). Adjudication outcomes in intimate and non-intimate homicides. Homicide Studies, 11, 213-230.
4.
BallingerA. (1996). The guilt of the innocent and the innocence of the guilty: The cases of Marie Fahmy and Ruth Ellis. In MyersA.WightS. (Eds.), No angels: Women who commit violence (pp. 1-28). London, UK: Pandora.
5.
BarnettB. (2006). Medea in the media: Narrative and myth in newspaper coverage of women who kill their children. Journalism, 7, 411-432.
6.
BergB. L. (2008). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
BerringtonE.HonkatukiaP. (2002). An evil monster and a poor thing: Female violence in the media. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 3, 50-72.
8.
BirchH. (1993). If looks could kill: Myra Hindley and the iconography of evil. In BirchH. (Ed.), Moving targets: Women, murder and representation (pp. 32-61). London, UK: Virago Press.
9.
BiroscakB. J.SmithP. K. (2005). Intimate partner homicide in Michigan, 1999–2003. Michigan Department of Community Health.
10.
BoyleK. A. (2005). Media and violence: Gendering the debates. Sage.
11.
BullockC. F. (2007). Framing domestic violence fatalities: Coverage by Utah newspapers. Women’s Studies in Communication, 30, 34-63.
12.
BullockC. F.CubertJ. (2002). Coverage of domestic violence fatalities by newspapers in Washington State. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 475-499.
13.
CarlyleK. E.ScarduzioJ. A.SlaterM. D. (2014). Media portrayals of female perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2394-2417.
14.
CarlyleK. E.SlaterM. D.ChakroffJ. L. (2008). Newspaper coverage of intimate partner violence: Skewing representations of risk. Journal of Communication, 58, 168-186.
15.
CarmodyD. C. (1998). Mixed messages: Images of domestic violence in “reality” television. In FishmanM.CavenderG. (Eds.), Entertaining crime: Television reality programs (pp. 159-174). Boston, MA: Aldine de Gruyter.
16.
ChermakS. M. (1995). Victims in the news: Crime and the American news media. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
17.
CollinsR. E. (2014). “Beauty and bullets”: A content analysis of female offenders and victims in four Canadian newspapers. Journal of Sociology, 52, 1-15.
18.
ComackE.BalfourG. (2004). The power to criminalize: Violence inequality and the law. Halifax, NS: Fernwood.
19.
EastealP.BartelsL.NelsonN.HollandK. (2015). How are women who kill portrayed in newspaper media? Connections with social values and the legal system. Women’s Studies International Forum, 51, 31-41.
20.
FairbairnJ.DawsonM. (2013). Canadian news coverage of intimate partner homicide: Analyzing changes over time. Feminist Criminology, 8, 147-176.
21.
FarrK. (2000). Defeminizing and dehumanizing female murderers. Women & Criminal Justice, 11(1), 49-66.
22.
FrigonS. (2006). Mapping scripts and narratives of women who kill their husbands in Canada, 1866-1954: Inscribing the everyday. In BurfootA.LordS. (Eds.), Killing women: The visual culture of gender and violence (pp. 3-20). Brantford, ON: Wilfred Laurier University.
23.
FugateM.LandisL.RiordanK.NaureckasS.EngelB. (2005). Barriers to domestic violence help seeking: Implications for intervention. Violence Against Women, 11,290-310.
24.
GoettingA. (1989). Patterns of marital homicide: A comparison of husbands and wives. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 20, 341-354.
25.
GraberD. A. (1980). Crime news and the public. Praeger.
26.
JewkesY. (2009). Media and crime. Sage.
27.
JohnsonM. P. (2010). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Boston, MA: Northeastern University.
28.
JohnsonM. P.LeoneJ. M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 322-349.
29.
JohnstoneJ. W.HawkinsD. F.MichenerA. (1994). Homicide reporting in Chicago dailies. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 71, 860-872.
30.
JonesJ. (2003). Medea’s daughters: Forming and performing the woman who kills. Colombus, OH: Ohio State University.
31.
KongR.AuCoinK. (2008). Female offenders in Canada. Statistics Canada, 28(1), 1-23.
32.
KruttschnittC. (1994). Gender and interpersonal violence. In Reiss, Jr.A. J.RothJ. (Eds.), Understanding and preventing violence (Vol. 3, pp. 293-376). Committee on Law and Justice, National Research Council, National Academy Press.
33.
LazarR. (2008). Reconceptualizing victimization and agency in the discourse of battered women who kill. Studies in Law, Politics and Society, 45, 3-45.
34.
LinJ. R. (2012). Femininity on trial: Decoding media representations of Mary Winkler, unpublished report in partial fulfillment of Master of Arts at the University of Texas at Austin.
LombrosoC. (1895). The female offender. London, UK: T. Fisher Unwin.
37.
MannC. R. (1998). Getting even? Women who kill in domestic encounters. Justice Quarterly, 5, 33-51.
38.
MatthesJ.KohringM. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58, 258-279.
39.
McManusJ.DorfmanL. (2005). Functional truth or sexist distortion? Assessing a feminist critique of intimate violence reporting. Journalism, 6, 43-65.
40.
MeloyM. L.MillerS. L. (2009). Words that wound: Print media’s presentation of gendered violence. In HumphriesD. (Ed.), Women violence and the media (pp. 29-56). Boston, MA: Northeastern University.
41.
MeyersM. (1997). News coverage of violence against women: Engendering blame. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
MorrisseyB. (2003). When women kill: Questions of agency and subjectivity. New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
NaffineN. (1995). (Ed.). Gender, crime and feminism. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
44.
NagyV. M. (2014). Narratives in the courtroom: Female poisoners in mid-nineteenth century England. European Journal of Criminology, 11, 213-227.
45.
NaylorB. (2001). Reporting violence in the British print media: Gendered stories. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 180-194.
46.
NohM. S.LeeM. T.FelteyK. M. (2010). Mad, bad, or reasonable? Newspaper portrayals of the battered woman who kills. Gender Issues, 27, 110-130.
47.
PeeloM.FrancisB.SoothillK.PearsonJ.AckerleyE. (2004). Newspaper reporting and the public construction of homicide. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 256-275.
48.
PostL. A.SmithP. K.MeyerE. (2009). Media frames of intimate partner homicide. In StarkE.Schlesinger BuzawaE. (Eds.), Violence against women in families and relationships (pp. 59-79). New York, NY: Praeger/Greenwood.
49.
PritchardD.HughesK. D. (1997). Patterns of deviance in crime news. Journal of Communication, 47(3), 49-67.
RobertsA. R. (1996). Battered women who kill: A comparative study of incarcerated participants with a community sample of battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 291-304.
52.
SealL. (2010). Women, murder and femininity: Gender representations of women who kill. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
53.
SheleyJ. F.AshkinsC. D. (1981). Crime, crime news, and crime views. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 492-506.
54.
SjobergL.GentryC. (2007). Mothers, monsters, whores: Women’s violence in global politics. New York, NY: Zed Books.
55.
SkilbreiM. (2012). Sisters in crime: Representations of gender and class in the media coverage and court proceedings of the triple homicide at Orderud farm. Crime, Media, Culture, 9, 136-152.
56.
SorensonS. B.ManzJ. G.BerkR. A. (1998). News media coverage and the epidemiology of homicide. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1510-1514.
57.
SudnowD. (1965). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. Social Problems, 12, 255-276.
58.
SwattM. L.HeN. (2006). Exploring the difference between male and female intimate partner homicides: Revisiting the concept of situated transactions. Homicide Studies, 10, 279-292.
59.
SweeneyM. (2012). Listening rhetorically to textual silence: Intimate partner homicide media coverage. International Journal of Listening, 26, 146-158.
60.
TaylorC. A.SorensonS. B. (2002). The nature of newspaper coverage of homicide. Injury Prevention, 8, 121-127.
61.
TaylorR. (2009). Slain and slandered: A content analysis of the portrayal of femicide in crime news. Homicide Studies, 13, 21-49.
62.
WeareS. (2013). “The mad”, “the bad”, “the victim”: Gendered constructions of women who kill within the criminal justice system. Laws, 2, 337-361.
63.
WeatherbyG.BlancheJ.JonesR. (2008). The value of life: Female killers and the feminine mystique. Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice Research & Education, 2(1), 1-20.
64.
WilczynskiA. (1997). Mad or bad? Child–killers, gender and the courts. British Journal of Criminology, 37, 419-436.
65.
WorrallA. (1981). Out of place: Female offenders in court. Probation Journal, 28, 90-93.
66.
WozniakJ. A.McCloskeyK. A. (2010). Fact or fiction? Gender issues related to newspaper reports of intimate partner homicide. Violence Against Women, 16, 934-952.
67.
WykesM. (1998). A family affair: The British press, sex and the Wests. In CarterC.BranstonG.AllenS. (Eds.), News, gender and power (pp. 223-247). London, UK: Routledge.
