Redemption research examines how much time must pass after a criminal offense before an offender is considered “redeemed.” This study adds to redemption research by using a nationally representative sample from the United States to determine whether years to redemption found in prior research replicate and will be the first to determine whether there are gender differences. We also explore factors that influence who makes it to the redemption point. Findings reveal that while men reach the redemption point after 10 years, women reach the redemption point after 4 years. Policy implications of these findings are discussed.
AllardP. (2002). Life sentences: Denying welfare benefits to women convicted of drug offenses. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
2.
AlpertG.DunhamR.StroshineM.BennettK.MacDonaldJ. (2006). Police officers’ decision making and discretion: Forming suspicion and making a stop. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
3.
BatiukM.LahmK.McKeeverM.WilcoxN.WilcoxP. (2005). Disentangling the effects of correctional education: Are current policies misguided? An event history analysis. Criminal Justice, 5, 55-74.
4.
BelknapJ. (2007). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
5.
BlitzC. (2006). Predictors of stable employment among female inmates in New Jersey: Implications for successful reintegration. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43, 1-22.
6.
BlumsteinA.CohenJ.RothJ.VisherC. (Eds.). (1986). Criminal careers and career criminals (Vols. 1 and 2). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7.
BlumsteinA.NakamuraK. (2009). Redemption in the presence of widespread criminal background checks. Criminology, 47, 327-360.
8.
BushwayS.NieuwbeertaP.BloklandA. (2011). The predictive value of criminal background checks: Do age and criminal history affect time to redemption?Criminology, 49, 27-60.
9.
CarsonE. A.GolinelliD. (2013). Prisoners in 2012: Trends in admissions and releases, 1991-2012 (Special report). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
10.
CaseP.FasenfestD. (2004). Expectations for opportunities following prison education: A discussion of race and gender. Journal of Correctional Education, 55, 24-39.
11.
Chesney-LindM. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
CobbinaJ. E. (2010). Reintegration success and failure: Factors impacting reintegration among incarcerated and formerly incarcerated women. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49, 210-232.
13.
ColemanJ.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-121.
14.
DalyK. (1998). Gender, crime and criminology. In TonryM. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of crime and justice (pp. 85-108). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15.
DuroseM.CooperA.SnyderH. (2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010 (Special report). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
16.
EhrensaftM.KhashuA.RossT.WamsleyM. (2003). Patterns of criminal conviction and incarceration among mothers of children in foster care in New York City. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
17.
FrostN.GreeneJ.PranisK. (2006). Hard hit: The growth in the imprisonment of women, 1977-2004. Institute on Women and Criminal Justice. Retrieved from http://csdp.org/research/HardHitReport4.pdf
18.
GiordanoP. C.CernkovichS. A.RudolphJ. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 990-1064.
19.
GrahamJ.BowlingB. (1995). Young people and crime. London, England: Home Office.
20.
HeimerK. (2000). Changes in the gender gap in crime and women’s economic marginalization. Criminal Justice, 1, 427-483.
21.
HoltfreterK.ReisigM. D.MorashM. (2004). Poverty, state capital, and recidivism among women offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 3, 185-208.
22.
HolzerH.RaphaelJ.StollM. (2003). Employment barriers facing ex-offenders. New York, NY: The Urban Institute.
23.
HuebnerB. M.DeJongC.CobbinaJ. E. (2010). Women coming home: Long-term patterns of recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 27, 225-254.
24.
JacobsJ.CrepetT. (2006). The expanding scope, use, and availability of criminal records. Legislation and Public Policy, 11, 177-213.
25.
KirkD. (2008). The neighborhood context of racial and ethnic disparities in arrests. Demography, 45, 55-77.
26.
KreagerD. A.MatsuedaR. L.EroshevaE. A. (2010). Motherhood and criminal desistance in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Criminology, 48, 221-258.
27.
KurlychekM.BrameR.BushwayS. (2006). Scarlet letters and recidivism: Does an old criminal record predict future offending?Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 483-522.
28.
KurlychekM.BrameR.BushwayS. (2007). Enduring risk? Old criminal records and prediction of future criminal involvement. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 64-83.
29.
KurlychekM.BushwayS.BrameR. (2012). Long-term crime desistance and recidivism patterns—Evidence from the Essex County convicted felon study. Criminology, 50, 71-103.
30.
LaubJ.SampsonR. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
MallicoatS.IrelandC. (2014). Women and crime: The essentials. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
32.
MichalsenV. (2011). Mothering as a life course transition: Do women go straight for their children?Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50, 349-366.
33.
MillerJ. (n.d.). Writing about hazard analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research.
34.
MooreW.PedlowS.KrishnamurtyP.WolterK. (2000). National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 (NLSY97) (Technical sampling report). Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
OwenB. (1998). In the mix: Struggle and survival in a women’s prison. Albany: State University of New York Press.
37.
PagerD. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 937-975.
38.
PaternosterR.BrameR.MazerolleP.PiqueroA. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859-866.
39.
Pew Research Center. (2011). State of recidivism: The revolving door of America’s prisons (NCJ Publication No. 234180). Washington, DC: Author.
40.
PotterH. (2015). Intersectionality and criminology: Disrupting and revolutionizing studies of crime. New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
PortesA. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and application in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
42.
SalisburyE. J.Van VoorhisP. (2009). Gendered pathways: A quantitative investigation of women probationers’ paths to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 541-566.
43.
SampsonR.LaubJ. (2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41, 319-339.
44.
SchwartzJ. (2013). A “new” female offender or increasing social control of women’s behavior? Cross-national evidence. Feminist Studies, 39, 790-821.
The Sentencing Project. (2013). Incarceration. Washington, DC: Author.
47.
ShermanL. (1980). Causes of police behavior: The current state of qualitative research. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency. 17, 69-100.
48.
SingerJ.WillettJ. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
49.
SnellT.MortonD. (1994). Women in prison (Special report). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
50.
SoothillK.FrancisB. (2009). When do ex-offenders become like non-offenders?The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 373-387.
51.
StevensD. J.WardC. S. (1997). College education and recidivism: Educating criminals is meritorious. Journal of Correctional Education, 48, 106-111.
52.
UggenC.StaffJ. (2004). Work as a turning point for criminal offenders. In KrienertJ. L.FleisherM. (Eds.), Crime and employment: Critical issues in crime reduction for corrections (pp. 141-166). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
53.
UlmerJ. T. (2001). Intermediate sanctions: A comparative analysis of the probability and severity of recidivism. Sociological Inquiry, 71, 164-193.
54.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 cohort, 1997-2011 (rounds 1-15). Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago (Producer). Columbus: Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University (Distributor).
55.
VaccaJ. S. (2004). Educated prisoners are less likely to return to prison. Journal of Correctional Education, 55, 297-305.
56.
WattanapornK. A.HoltfreterK. (2014). The impact of feminist pathways research on gender-responsive policy and practice. Feminist Criminology, 9, 191-207.
57.
WordenR. (1989). Situational and attitudinal explanations of police behavior: A theoretical appraisal and empirical assessment. Law & Society Review, 23, 667-711.
