Juvenile justice reformers and practitioners have long blamed mothers for juvenile delinquency, identifying maternal employment as a key cause of youthful offending. The current study uses data from registered voters (N = 10,144) to examine public views about whether maternal employment in two-parent households promotes juvenile delinquency. The results show that only a small minority of citizens blame working mothers for youth crime. The findings also reveal that views about the criminogenic consequences of maternal employment for children are predicted by factors that are strongly associated with gendered self-interest and exposure to nonegalitarian narratives. Implications of the findings are discussed.
AnsolabehereS.SchaffnerB. F. (2014). Does survey mode still matter? Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison. Political Analysis, 22, 285-303.
2.
AughinbaughA.GittlemanM. (2004). Maternal employment and adolescent risky behavior. Journal of Health Economics, 23, 815-838.
3.
BakerT.ClearyH. M. D.PickettJ. T.GertzM. (2013). Crime salience and public willingness to pay for child saving and juvenile punishment. Crime & Delinquency. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0011128713505487
4.
BeckerS.TinklerJ. (2015). “Me getting plastered and her provoking my eyes”: Young people’s attribution of blame for sexual aggression in public drinking spaces. Feminist Criminology, 10, 235-258. doi:10.1177/1557085114541142.
5.
BellinghamB. (1983). The unspeakable blessing: Street children, reform rhetoric, and misery in early industrial capitalism. Politics and Society, 12, 303-330.
6.
BernardT. J.KurlychekM. C. (2010). The cycle of juvenile justice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
BlalockH. M.Jr. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York, NY: John Wiley.
8.
BolzendahlC. I.MyersD. J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974-1998. Social Forces, 83, 759-789.
9.
BootsD. P.HeideK. M.CochranJ. K. (2004). Death penalty support for special offender populations of legally convicted murderers: Juveniles, the mentally retarded, and the mentally incompetent. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22, 223-238.
10.
BreckinridgeS. P.AbbottE. (1970). The delinquent child and the home. New York, NY: Arno Press. (Original work published 1912)
11.
BrooksC.BolzendahlC. (2004). The transformation of US gender role attitudes: Cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research, 33, 106-133.
12.
BushW. S. (2010). Who gets a childhood? Race and juvenile justice in twentieth-century Texas. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
ChristopherA. N.WojdaM. R. (2008). Social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, sexism, and prejudice toward women in the workforce. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 65-73.
15.
CiabattariT. (2001). Changes in men’s conservative gender ideologies: Cohort and period influences. Gender and Society, 15, 574-591.
16.
ColeyR. L.LombardiC. M. (2013). Does maternal employment following childbirth support or inhibit low-income children’s long-term development?Child Development, 84, 178-197.
17.
CosterS. D. (2012). Mothers’ work and family roles, gender ideologies, distress, and parenting: Consequences for juvenile delinquency. Sociological Quarterly, 53, 585-609.
18.
DavisS. N.GreensteinT. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87-105.
19.
DavisS. N.WillsJ. B. (2010). Adolescent gender ideology socialization: Direct and moderating effects of fathers’ beliefs. Sociological Spectrum, 30, 580-604.
20.
DeglerC. N. (1980). At odds: Women and the family in America from the revolution to the present. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
DragiewiczD. (2008). Patriarchy reasserted: Fathers’ rights and anti-VAWA activism. Feminist Criminology, 3, 121-144.
22.
EllisC.StimsonJ. A. (2012). Ideology in America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
23.
ErskineH. (1974). The polls: Causes of crime. Public Opinion Quarterly, 38, 288-298.
24.
FaludiS. (1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York, NY: Doubleday.
25.
FeldB. C. (1999). Bad kids: Race and the transformation of the juvenile court. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
FisherJ. A. (2011). Gendering science: Contextualizing historical and contemporary pursuits of difference. In FisherJ. A. (Ed.), Gender and the science of difference: Cultural politics of contemporary science and medicine (pp. 1-26). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
27.
GoldbergW. A.PrauseJ.Lucas-ThompsonR.HimselA. (2008). Maternal employment and children’s achievement in context: A meta-analysis of four decades of research. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 77-108.
28.
GotliebM. R.WellsC. (2012). From concerned shopper to dutiful citizen: Implications of individual and collective orientations toward political consumerism. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644, 207-219.
29.
GouldS. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
30.
GrasmickH. G.CochranJ. K.BursikR. J.Jr.KimpelM. (1993). Religion, punitive justice, and support for the death penalty. Justice Quarterly, 10, 289-314.
31.
GreenbergerE.GoldbergW. A.CrawfordT. J.GrangerJ. (1988). Beliefs about the consequences of maternal employment for children. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 35-59.
32.
GrubbW. N.LazersonM. (1988). Broken promises: How Americans fail their children. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
33.
HayesR. M.LorenzeK.BellK. A. (2013). Victim blaming others: Rape myth acceptance and the just world belief. Feminist Criminology, 8, 202-220.
34.
Hayes-SmithR. M.LevettL. M. (2010). Student perceptions of sexual assault resources and prevalence of rape myth attitudes. Feminist Criminology, 5, 335-354.
35.
HoffmanB.Vander VenT. (2007). Mother blame and delinquency claims: Juvenile delinquency and maternal responsibility. In McShaneM. D.Williams IIIF. P. (Eds.), Youth violence and delinquency (pp. 159-176). Westport. CT: Praeger.
36.
IgoS. E. (2007). The averaged American: Surveys, citizens, and the making of a mass public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
JackmanS.VavreckL. (2009). The 2008 cooperative campaign analysis project (Release 2.1). Palo Alto, CA: YouGov/Polimetrix (Producer and Distributor).
38.
JanI.BallJ. D.WalshA. (2008). Predicting public opinion about juvenile waivers. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 285-300.
39.
JenkinsP. (1998). Moral panic: Changing concepts of the child molester in modern America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40.
KamC. D.KinderD. R. (2012). Ethnocentrism as a short-term force in the 2008 American presidential election. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 326-340.
41.
KaneE. W. (2000). Racial and ethnic variations in gender-related attitudes. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 419-439.
42.
KasinskyR. G. (1994). Child neglect and “unfit” mothers: Child savers in the progressive era and today. Women & Criminal Justice, 6, 97-129.
43.
KellstedtL.SmidtC. (1991). Measuring fundamentalism: An analysis of different operational strategies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 259-278.
44.
KettJ. F. (1977). Rites of passage: Adolescence in American 1790 to the present. New York, NY: Basic Books.
45.
Ladd-TaylorM.UmanskyL. (Eds.). (1998). “ Bad” mothers: The politics of blame in twentieth-century America. New York: New York University Press.
46.
LeiberM. J.WoodrickA. C. (1997). Religious beliefs, attributional styles, and adherence to correctional orientations. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 495-511.
47.
LombardiC. M.ColeyR. L. (2014). Early maternal employment and children’s school readiness in contemporary families. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2071-2084.
48.
LongJ. S.FreeseJ. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
49.
LyeD. N.WaldronI. (1997). Attitudes toward cohabitation, family, and gender roles: Relationship to values and political ideology. Sociological Perspectives, 40, 199-225.
50.
MearsD. P.HayC.GertzM.ManciniC. (2007). Public opinion and the foundation of the juvenile court. Criminology, 45, 223-257.
51.
MenardS. (2010). Logistic regression: From introductory to advanced concepts and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
MillerS. P. (2014). The age of evangelicalism: America’s born-again years. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
53.
MoynihanD. P. (1965). The Negro family: The case for national action. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
54.
NaborsE. L.JasinskiJ. L. (2009). Intimate partner violence perpetration among college students: The role of gender role and gendered violence attitudes. Feminist Criminology, 4, 57-82.
55.
New York Children’s Aid Society. (1858). Annual report, no. 5. New York, NY.
56.
OdemM. E. (1995). Delinquent daughters: Protecting and policing adolescent female sexuality in the United States, 1885-1920. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
57.
PeekC. W.LoweG. D.WilliamsL. S. (1991). Gender and God’s word: Another look at religious fundamentalism and sexism. Social Forces, 69, 1205-1221.
58.
PeskowitzM. (2005). The truth behind the mommy wars: Who decides what makes a good mother?Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.
59.
PetersonB. E.ZurbriggenE. L. (2010). Gender, sexuality, and the authoritarian personality. Journal of Personality, 78, 1801-1826.
60.
PickettJ. T.BakerT. (2014). The pragmatic American: Empirical relaity or methodological artifact?Criminology, 52, 195-222.
61.
PickettJ. T.ChiricosT. (2012). Controlling other people’s children: Racialized views of delinquency and Whites’ punitive attitudes toward juvenile offenders. Criminology, 50, 673-710.
62.
PickettJ. T.ChiricosT.GertzM. (2014). The racial foundations of Whites’ support for child saving. Social Science Research, 44, 44-59.
63.
PickettJ. T.ManciniC.MearsD. P.GertzM. (2015). Public (mis)understanding of crime policy: The effects of criminal justice experience and media reliance. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26, 500-522.
64.
PlattA. M. (2009). The child savers: The invention of delinquency (Expanded 40th anniversary ed.). Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
65.
QuillianL. (2006). New approaches to understanding racial prejudice and discrimination. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 299-328.
66.
RiversD.BaileyD. (2009). Inference from matched samples in the 2008 US national elections. Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings (pp. 627-639).
67.
SharpS. F.McGheeM. K.HopeT. L.CoyneR. (2007). Predictors of support of legislation banning juvenile executions in Oklahoma: An examination by race and sex. Justice Quarterly, 24, 133-155.
68.
ShieldsS. A. (1975). Functionalism, Darwinism, and the psychology of women. American Psychologist, 30, 739-754.
69.
SolerM. (2001). Public opinion on youth, crime and race: A guide for advocates. Washington, DC: Building Blocks for Youth.
70.
SossJ.LangbeinL.MetelkoA. R. (2003). Why do White Americans support the death penalty. Journal of Politics, 65, 397-421.
71.
SteinerL. M. (2007). Mommy wars: Stay-at-home and career moms face off on their choices, their lives, their families. New York, NY: Random House.
72.
TanS. J. (2008). The myths and realities of maternal employment. In Marcus-NewhallA.HalpernD. F.TanS. J. (Eds.), The changing realities of work and family: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 9-24). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
73.
Taylor-ThompsonK. (2006). Girl talk—Examining racial and gender lines in juvenile justice. Nevada Law Journal, 6, 1137-1164.
74.
UnneverJ. D.CochranJ. K.CullenF. T.ApplegateB. K. (2010). The pragmatic American: Attributions of rime and the hydraulic relation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 27, 431-457.
75.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T. (2010). The social sources of Americans’ punitiveness: A test of three competing models. Criminology, 48, 99-129.
76.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). Labor force characteristics by race and ethnicity, 2013 (BLS Reports, Report 1050). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/cps/race_ethnicity_2013.pdf
77.
ValentineS. (2001). Development of a brief multidimensional aversion to women who work scale. Sex Roles, 44, 773-787.
78.
Vander VenT.CullenF. T. (2004). The impact of maternal employment on serious youth crime: Does the quality of working conditions matter?Crime & Delinquency, 50, 272-291.
79.
Vander VenT.CullenF. T.CarrozzaM. A.WrightJ. P. (2001). Home alone: The impact of maternal employment on delinquency. Social Problems, 48, 236-257.
80.
VavreckL.RiversD. (2008). The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18, 355-366.
81.
WardG. (2012). The Black child-savers: Racial democracy and American juvenile justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
82.
WhaleyR. B.MessnerS. F.VeyseyB. M. (2013). The relationship between gender equality and rates of inter- and intra-sexual lethal violence: An exploration of functional form. Justice Quarterly, 30, 732-754.
83.
WhiteheadA. L. (2012). Gender ideology and religion: Does a masculine image of God matter?Review of Religious Research, 54, 139-156.
84.
WilliamsR. (2006). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. The Stata Journal, 6, 58-82.
85.
WillsJ. B.BrauerJ. R. (2012). Have children adapted to their mothers working, or was adaptation unnecessary? Cohort effects and the relationship between maternal employment and child well-being. Social Science Research, 41, 425-443.
86.
XieM.HeimerK.LauritsenJ. L. (2012). Violence against women in the U.S. metropolitan areas: Changes in women’s status and risk, 1980-2004. Criminology, 50, 105-143.
87.
YoungR. L. (1992). Religious orientation and support for the death penalty. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion, 31, 76-87.
88.
YoungV. D. (1994). Race and gender in the establishment of juvenile institutions: The case of the south. The Prison Journal, 74, 244-265.
