Few studies have examined whether social ties influence concerns about reentry among women in prison. Given that a systematic understanding of reentry has the potential to inform research and policy efforts to assist women with transition, this gap is limiting. Our study addresses this void by testing whether social support affects reentry concerns (family, employment, financial, and stigma) among incarcerated women. Results indicate that visits reduced all concerns; receiving letters had a less consistent effect, but they too, were associated with reduced worry. In addition, experiencing multiple types of support influenced reentry concerns among women. Research and policy implications are discussed.
AgnewR. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47-88.
2.
AgnewR. (2005). Why do criminals offend? A general theory of crime and delinquency. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
3.
AlaridL. F.BurtonV. S.CullenF. T. (2000). Gender and crime among felony offenders: Assessing the generality of social control and differential association theories. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 37, 171-199.
4.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2008). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Lenexa, KS: Author.
5.
BakerT.PelfreyW. V.BedardL. E.DhunganaK.GertzM.GoldenK. (2014). Female inmates’ procedural justice perceptions of the police and courts: Is there a spill-over of police effects?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 144-162.
6.
BalesW. D.MearsD. P. (2008). Inmate social ties and the transition to society: Does visitation reduce recidivism?Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 45, 287-321.
7.
BelknapJ. (2014). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice (4th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
8.
BerryP. E.EigenbergH. M. (2003). Role strain and incarcerated mothers: Understanding the process of mothering. Women & Criminal Justice, 15, 101-119.
9.
BersaniB. E.LaubJ. H.NieuwbeertaP. (2009). Marriage and desistance from crime in the Netherlands: Do gender and socio-historical context matter?Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 3-24.
10.
BloomB.OwenB.CovingtonS. (2003). Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
11.
BroderickP. C. (1998). Early adolescent differences in the use of ruminative and distracting coping strategies. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 173-191.
12.
BroidyL.AgnewR. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 34, 276-307.
13.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2014). Female prisoners under the jurisdiction of state or federal correctional authorities, December 31, 1978-2013. Washington, DC: Author.
14.
Casey-AcevedoK.BakkenT. (2002). Visiting women in prison: Who visits and who cares?Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34, 67-83.
15.
ChristianJ. (2005). Riding the bus barriers to prison visitation and family management strategies. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 31-48.
16.
ChristianS. (2009). Children of incarcerated parents. Denver, CO: National Conference of State Legislatures.
17.
CochranJ. C. (2012). The ties that bind or the ties that break: Examining the relationship between visitation and prisoner misconduct. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 433-440.
18.
CochranJ. C. (2014). Breaches in the wall: Imprisonment, social support, and recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 51, 200-228.
19.
DuweG.ClarkV. (2013). Blessed be the social tie that binds: The effects of prison visitation on offender recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24, 271-296.
20.
EnosS. (2001). Mothering from the inside: Parenting in a women’s prison. New York: State University of New York Press.
21.
FerraroK. J.MoeA. M. (2003). Women’s stories of survival and resistance. In ZaitzowB. H.ThomasJ. (Eds.), Women in prison: Gender and social control (pp. 65-94). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
22.
Florida Department of Corrections. (2010). Agency annual report 2009-2010. Tallahassee, FL: Author.
23.
GiallombardoR. (1966). Social roles in a prison for women. Social Problems, 13, 268-288.
24.
GibbsJ. T. (1997). African-American suicide: A cultural paradox. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 27, 68-79.
25.
GiordanoP. C.CernkovichS. A.HollandD. D. (2003). Changes in friendship relations over the life course: Implications for desistance from crime. Criminology, 41, 293-328.
26.
GiordanoP. C.CernkovichS. A.RudolphJ. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 990-1064.
27.
GlazeL. E.MaruschakL. M. (2010). Parents in prison and their minor children. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
28.
HairstonC. F. (1991). Mothers in jail: Parent-child separation and jail visitation. Affilia, 6, 9-27.
29.
HarrisP. M.KellerK. S. (2005). Ex-Offenders need not apply: The criminal background check in hiring decisions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 6-30.
30.
HayC. (2003). Family strain, gender, and delinquency. Sociological Perspectives, 46, 107-135.
31.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32.
HoffmannH. C.ByrdA. L.KightlingerA. M. (2010). Prison programs and services for incarcerated parents and their underage children: Results from a national survey of correctional facilities. The Prison Journal, 90, 397-416.
33.
JiangS.WinfreeL. T. (2006). Social support, gender, and inmate adjustment to prison life: Insights from a national sample. The Prison Journal, 86, 32-55.
34.
KerleyK. R.MatthewsT. L.BlanchardT. C. (2005). Religiosity, religious participation, and negative prison behaviors. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 443-457.
35.
La VigneN. G.NaserR. L.BrooksL. E.CastroJ. L. (2005). Examining the effect of incarceration and in-prison family contact on prisoners’ family relationships. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 314-335.
36.
ListwanS. J.SperberK. G.SpruanceL. M.Van VoorhisP. (2004). High anxiety offenders in correctional settings: It’s time for another look. Federal Probation, 68, 43-50.
37.
LiuS.PickettJ. T.BakerT. (2014). Inside the black box: Prison visitation, the costs of offending, and inmate social capital. Criminal Justice Policy Review. doi: 10.1177/0887403414562421
38.
LynchS. M.FritchA.HeathN. M. (2012). Looking beneath the surface: The nature of incarcerated women’s experiences of interpersonal violence, treatment needs, and mental health. Feminist Criminology, 7, 381-400.
39.
MearsD. P.CochranJ. C.SiennickS. E.BalesW. D. (2012). Prison visitation and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 29, 888-918.
40.
Minnesota Department of Corrections. (2014). Minnesota Department of Corrections Offender Messaging Program (O-Mail). St. Paul: Author.
41.
MollemanT.van GinnekenE. F. (2014). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between cell sharing, staff-prisoner relationships, and prisoners’ perceptions of prison quality. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative. doi: 10.1177/0306624X14525912
42.
OwenB. (1998). “In the mix”: Struggle and survival in a women’s prison. Albany: State University of New York Press.
43.
OwenB.BloomB. (1995). Profiling women prisoners: Findings from national surveys and a California sample. The Prison Journal, 75, 65-185.
44.
PetersiliaJ. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45.
PickettJ. T.MetcalfeC. F.BakerT.GertzM.BedardL. (2014). Superficial survey choice: An experimental test of a potential method for increasing response rates and response quality in correctional surveys. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 265-284.
46.
PiqueroN. L.SealockM. D. (2004). Gender and general strain theory: A preliminary test of Broidy and Agnew’s gender/GST hypotheses. Justice Quarterly, 21, 125-158.
47.
PollockJ. M. (2002). Women, crime, and prison. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
48.
SalisburyE. J.Van VoorhisP. (2009). Gendered pathways: A quantitative investigation of women probationers’ path to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 541-566.
49.
Second Chance Act, P.L. 110-199, 122 Stat. 658 (2008).
50.
SharpS. F. (2014). Mean lives, mean laws: Oklahoma’s women prisoners. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
51.
SharpS. F.BrewsterD.LoveS. R. (2005). Disentangling strain, personal attributes, affective response and deviance: A gendered analysis. Deviant Behavior, 26, 133-157.
52.
SharpS. F.EriksenM. E. (2003). Imprisoned mothers and their children. In ZaitzowB. H.ThomasJ. (Eds.), Women in prison: Gender and social control (pp. 119-136). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
53.
SharpS. F.Marcus-MendozaS. T. (2001). It’s a family affair: Incarcerated women and their families. Women & Criminal Justice, 12, 21-49.
54.
TamresL. K.JanickiD.HelgesonV. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 2-30.
55.
UggenC.KruttschnittC. (1998). Crime in the breaking: Gender differences in desistance. Law & Society Review, 32, 401-428.
56.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2013). Crime in the United States, 2012. Washington, DC: Author.
57.
VisherC. A. (2013). Incarcerated fathers: Pathways from prison to home. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24, 9-26.
58.
VisherC. A.O’ConnellD. J. (2012). Incarceration and inmates’ self perceptions about returning home. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 386-393.
59.
VisherC. A.TravisJ. (2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 89-113.
60.
WardD. A.KassebaumG. (1965). Women’s prison: Sex and social structure. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
61.
WidomC. S. (1989). The cycle of violence. Science, 244, 160-166.
62.
WinnickT. A.BodkinM. (2008). Anticipated stigma and stigma management among those to be labeled “ex-con.”Deviant Behavior, 29, 295-333.
