Alongside literature on how crime and crime control reproduce racial inequality, less attention has been paid to how the social construction of crime reproduces masculine privilege. To address this gap, I examine 71 interviews with gun carriers. While gun carriers actively promote guns to women, they tend to assume a masculine perspective on crime by emphasizing fast, warlike violence perpetrated by strangers—the kinds of crime men, as opposed to women, are likely to face. Extending theories of vulnerability to gun politics, I argue that the social construction of crime is a key vehicle through which gender is reproduced.
AndersonE. (2009). Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinities. New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
AndersonK.UmbersonD. (2001). Gendering violence: Masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender & Society, 15, 358-380.
3.
BeckU. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
BernsN. (2004). Framing the victim: Domestic violence, media and social problems. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
5.
BlackM.BasileK.BreidingM.SmithS.WaltersM.MerrickM. . . . StevensM. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
BrownJ. (1997). Working toward freedom from violence: The process of change in battered women. Violence Against Women, 3, 5-26.
8.
BrownW. (1993). Wounded attachments. Political Theory, 21, 390-410.
9.
BrowneA.SalomonA.BassukS. (1999). The impact of recent partner violence on poor women’s capacity to work. Violence Against Women, 5, 393-426.
10.
BumillerK. (1992). The civil rights society. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
BurbickJ. (2006). Gun show nation: Gun culture and American democracy. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
12.
ButlerJ. (2004). Precarious life. New York, NY: Verso.
13.
CatalanoS. (2007). Intimate partner violence in the US. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
14.
CatalanoS. (2012). Intimate partner violence, 1993-2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
15.
CavanaghK.DobashE.DobashR.LewisR. (2001). “Remedial work”: Men’s strategic responses to their violence against intimate female partners. Sociology, 35, 695-714.
16.
ChaY.ThebaudS. (2009). Labor Markets, Breadwinning, and Beliefs: How Economic Context Shapes Men’s Gender Ideology. Gender & Society, 23, 215-243.
17.
Chesney-LindM. (2006). Patriarchy, crime, and justice: Feminist criminology in an era of backlash. Feminist Criminology, 1, 6-26.
18.
ChristieN. (1986). Ideal victims. In FattahE. (Ed.), From crime policy to victim policy: Reorienting the justice system (pp. 17-30) London, England: Macmillan.
19.
ConnellR. (2005). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
CooperA.SmithE. (2011). Homicide trends in the United States, 1980-2008. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
21.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299.
22.
DragiewiczM. (2008). Patriarchy reasserted: Fathers’ rights and Anti-VAWA activism. Feminist Criminology, 3, 121-144.
23.
DurfeeA. (2011). “I’m not a victim, she’s an abuser”: Masculinity, victimization, and protection orders. Gender & Society, 25, 316-334.
24.
FinemanM. (2008). The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 20, 8-40.
25.
FinucaneM.SlovicP.MertzC.FlynnJ.SatterfieldT. (2000). Gender, race, and perceived risk: The “White Male” effect. Healthy Risk & Society, 2, 159-172.
26.
FleuryR.SullivanC.BybeeD. (2000). When ending the relationship does not end the violence: Women’s experience of violence by former partners. Violence Against Women, 6, 1363-1383.
27.
FranklinC.FranklinT. (2009). Predicting fear of crime: Considering differences across gender. Feminist Criminology, 4, 83-106.
28.
GaeserE.GlendonS. (1998). Who owns guns? Criminals, victims, and the culture of violence. American Economic Review, 88, 458-462.
29.
GallagherS.SmithC. (1999). Symbolic traditionalism and pragmatic egalitarianism: Contemporary Evangelicals, families, and gender. Gender & Society, 13, 211-233.
GarlandD. (2002). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
GavanasA. (2004). Fatherhood politics in the United States: Masculinity, sexuality, race and marriage. Champaign-Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
33.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the Late Modern Age. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
GilsonE. (2011). Vulnerability, ignorance, and oppression. Hypatia. 26, 308-332.
35.
HarcourtB. (2006). Against prediction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36.
HarrisD. (1999). The stories, the statistics, and the law: Why “Driving While Black” matters. Minnesota Law Review, 84, 265-326.
37.
HeathM. (2003). Soft-boiled masculinity: Renegotiating gender and racial ideologies in the Promise Keepers Movement. Gender & Society, 17, 423-444.
38.
HepburnL.MillerM.AzraelD.HemenwayD. (2007). The US gun stock: Results from the 2004 National Firearms Survey. Injury Prevention, 13, 15-19.
39.
HollanderJ. (2001). Vulnerability and dangerousness: The construction of gender through conversation about violence. Gender & Society, 15, 83-109.
40.
KahanD.BramanD.GastilJ.SlovicP.MertzC. (2007). Culture and identity-protection cognition: Explaining the White-Male Effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 465-505.
41.
KenyonA. (2004). Dreaming suburbia: Detroit and the production of postwar space and culture. Detroit, MI: Wayne University Press.
42.
KilliasM. (1990). Vulnerability: Towards a better understanding of a variable in the genesis of fear of crime. Violence and Victims, 5, 97-108.
43.
KilliasM.ClericiC. (2000). Different measures of vulnerability in their relation to different dimensions of fear of crime. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 437-450.
44.
KimC.LosenD.HewittD. (2010). The school-to-prison pipeline. New York: New York University Press.
45.
LegerskiE.CornwallM. (2010). Working-class job loss, gender, and the negotiation of household labor. Gender & Society, 24, 447-474.
46.
LuptonD. (1999). Risk. New York, NY: Routledge.
47.
LuptonD.TullochJ. (1999). Theorizing fear of crime: Beyond the rational/irrational opposition. The British Journal of Sociology, 50, 507-523.
48.
MadrizE. (1997a). Nothing bad happens to good girls: Fear of crime in women’s lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
49.
MadrizE. (1997b). Images of criminals and victims: A study on women’s fear and social control. Gender & Society, 11, 342-356.
50.
MasseyC. (2004). Elites, identity politics, guns, and the manufacture of legal rights. Fordham Law Review, 73, 573-588.
51.
McCaugheyM. (1997). Real knock-outs: The physical feminism of women’s self-defense. New York: New York University Press.
52.
MelzerS. (2009). Gun Crusaders: The NRA’s culture war. New York: New York University Press.
53.
MessnerM. (2007). The masculinity of the Governator: Muscle and compassion in American politics. Gender & Society, 21, 461-480.
54.
MessnerM. (2011). King of the wild suburb: A memoir of fathers, sons and guns. Austin, TX: Plain View Press.
55.
MeyerE.PostL. (2006). Alone at night: A feminist ecological model of community violence. Feminist Criminology, 1, 207-227.
56.
MillerJ. (2008). Getting played: African American girls, urban inequality and gendered violence. New York: New York University Press.
57.
OlivieroK. (2011). Sensational nation and the Minutemen: Gendered citizenship and moral vulnerabilities. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36, 679-706.
58.
O’NeillK. (2007). Armed citizens and the stories they tell: The National Rifle Association’s achievement of terror and masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 9, 457-475.
59.
PantazisC. (2000). “Fear of crime,” vulnerability and poverty. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 414-436.
60.
PollettaF. (2006). It was like a fever: Storytelling in protest and politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
61.
PotterH. (2006). An argument for Black feminist criminology. Feminist Criminology, 1, 106-124.
62.
RiosV. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of Black and Latino boys. New York: New York University Press.
63.
SchrockD.PadavicI. (2007). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity in a batterer intervention program. Gender & Society, 21, 625-649.
64.
SimonJ. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
65.
SimonJ. (2010). Consuming obsessions: Housing, homicide and mass incarceration since 1950. Universal of Chicago Legal Forum, 2010, 165-204.
66.
SkrentnyJ. (2002). The minority rights revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
67.
SmithD.UchidaC. (1988). The social organization of self-help: A study of defensive weapon ownership. American Sociological Review, 53, 94-102.
68.
SmithT.SmithR. (1995). Changes in firearms ownership among women, 1980-1994. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 133-149.
69.
SokoloffN.DupontI. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11, 38-64.
70.
SpitzerR. (2004). The politics of gun control. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
71.
StabileC. (2006). White victims, Black villains: Gender, race and crime news in US culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
72.
StangeM.OysterC. (2000). Gun women: Firearms and feminism in contemporary America. New York: New York University Press.
73.
SteinA. (2005). Make room for Daddy: Anxious masculinity and emergent homophobias in neopatriarchal politics. Gender & Society, 19, 601-620.
74.
StiehmJ. (1982). The protected, the protector, the defender. Women’s Studies International Forum, 5, 367-376.
75.
StroudA. (2012). Good guys with guns: Hegemonic masculinity and concealed handguns. Gender & Society, 26, 216-238.
76.
TamborraT. (2012). Poor, urban, battered women who are stalked: How can we include their experiences?Feminist Criminology, 7, 112-129.
77.
TjadenP.TheonnesN. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142-161.
78.
TonryM. (1995). Malign Neglect: Race, Crime, and Punishment in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
79.
TonryM. (2011). Punishing race: A continuing American dilemma. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
80.
TurnerB. (2006). Vulnerability and human rights. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
81.
WacquantL. (2001). The penalization of poverty and the rise of neoliberalism. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 9, 401-412.
82.
WacquantL. (2009). Prisons of poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
83.
WalklateS. (2011). Reframing criminal victimization: Finding a place for vulnerability and resilience. Theoretical Criminology, 15, 179-194.
84.
WilcoxW. (2004). Soft patriarchs, new men: How Christianity shapes fathers and husbands. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
85.
WilkieJ. R. (1993). Changes in US Men’s Attitudes toward the Family Provider Role, 1972 - 1989. Gender & Society, 7, 261-279.
86.
WilliamsonE. (2010). Living in the world of the domestic violence perpetrator: Negotiating the unreality of coercive control. Violence Against Women, 16, 1412-1423.
87.
YoungM. (2003). The logic of masculinist protection: Reflections on the current security state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 29, 1-24.
88.
YoungR. (1986). Perceptions of crime, racial attitudes, and firearms ownership. Social Forces, 64, 473-486.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
