Early domestic violence victim advocacy included survivor-defined, intersectional, and social change practices rooted in feminism. Yet, research specifically examining the ways that advocates identify with and make meaning of feminism, and the relationship of such meanings to advocates’ practices, is limited. Drawing from interviews with 26 domestic violence victim advocates, the interaction between feminist identity, ideology, and practices is examined. Findings indicated that advocates with feminist identities and ideologies held survivor-defined, social change, and intersectional approaches to advocacy. Nonfeminist advocates practiced survivor-defined advocacy, but did not maintain social change or intersectional practices. Implications for advocacy are provided.
AdlerP.AdlerP. (2008). The four faces of ethnography. The Sociological Quarterly, 49, 1-30.
3.
AllenN. E.BybeeD. I.SullivanC. M. (2004). Battered women’s multitude of needs: Evidence supporting the need for comprehensive advocacy. Violence Against Women, 10, 1015-1035.
4.
ArnoldG.AkeJ. (in press). Reframing the narrative of the battered women’s movement. Violence Against Women.
BellM.PerezS.GoodmanL.DuttonM. (2011). Battered women’s perceptions of civil and criminal court helpfulness: The role of court outcome and process. Violence Against Women, 17, 71-88.
7.
Bent-GoodleyT. (2004). Perceptions of domestic violence: A dialogue with African American women. Health & Social Work, 29, 307-317.
8.
BrittonD. M. (2011). The gender of crime. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
9.
BybeeD. I.SullivanC. M (2002). The process through which a strengths-based intervention resulted in positive changes for battered women over time. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 103-132.
10.
ColeP. (2001). Impoverished women in violent partnerships: Designing services to fit their reality. Violence Against Women, 7, 222-223.
11.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
CrenshawK. W. (1994). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In FinemanM. A.MykitiukR. (Eds.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 93-118). New York, NY: Routledge.
DalyK. (1994). Men’s violence, victim advocacy, and feminist redress. Law and Society, 28, 777-785.
15.
DobashR. P.DobashR. E. (2004). Women’s violence to men in intimate relationships: Working a puzzle. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 324-349.
16.
DobashR. P.DobashR. E.WilsonM.DalyM. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71-91.
17.
DonnellyD.CookK. J.VanAusdaleD.FoleyL. (2005). White privilege, color blindness, and services to battered women. Violence Against Women, 11, 6-37.
18.
DonnellyD.CookK.WilsonL. (1999). Provision and exclusion: The dual face of services to battered women in three Deep South states. Violence Against Women, 5, 483-490
19.
DuganL.NaginD.RosenfeldR. (2003). Do domestic violence services save lives?National Institute of Justice Journal, 250, 20-25.
20.
FergusonK. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
21.
FerraroK. (2001). Woman battering: More than a family problem. In RenzettiC.GoodsteinL. (Eds.), Women crime and criminal justice (pp. 135-151). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
22.
FordD. A.RegoliM. R. (1993). The criminal prosecution of wife assaulters: Process, problems, and effects. In Zoe HiltonN. (Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault: Current trends and evaluation (pp. 127-164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
FugateM. (2005). Barriers to domestic violence help seeking: Implications for intervention. Violence Against Women, 11, 290-318.
24.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
25.
GoodkindJ.SullivanC.BybeeD. (2004). A contextual analysis of battered women’s safety planning. Violence Against Women, 10, 514-533.
26.
GoodmanL.EpsteinD. (2005). Refocusing on women: A new direction for policy and research on intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 479-487.
27.
GoodmanL. A.EpsteinD. (2008). Listening to battered women: A survivor-centered approach to advocacy, mental health, and justice. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
HartB. (1995). Coordinated community approaches to domestic violence. (Strategic Planning Workshop on Violence Against Women). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
29.
HaakenJ.YraguiN. (2003). Going underground: Conflicting perspectives on domestic violence shelter practices. Feminism and Psychology, 13, 49-71.
30.
Hill- CollinsP. (2000). Black feminist thought. NewYork, NY: Routledge.
HooksB. (2000). Feminism is for everyone: Passionate politics. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
33.
JordanC. (2004). Intimate partner violence and the justice system: An examination of the interface. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1412-1432.
34.
JordanC.PritchardA.DuckettD.Charnigo (2010). Criminal offending among respondents to protective orders: Crime types and patterns that predict victim risk. Violence Against Women, 16, 1396-1411.
35.
KellyK. (2003). Domestic violence and the politics of privacy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36.
KohnL. P.WilsonM. (1995). Social support networks in the African American family: Utility for culturally compatible intervention. In WilsonM. (Ed.), African American family life: Its structural and ecological aspects (pp. 35-58). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37.
KulkarniS.BellH.RhodesD. (2012). Back to basics. Violence Against Women, 18, 85.
38.
LehrnerA.AllenN. (2008). Social change movements and the struggle over meaning-making: A case study of domestic violence narratives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 220-234.
39.
LehrnerA.AllenN. (2009). Still a movement after all these years? Current tensions in the domestic violence movement. Violence Against Women, 5, 1-22.
40.
LincolnY. SGubaE. A. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41.
LindquistT. (2008). Mandated to service: How to best serve survivors who are forced to use our services. (Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence). Retrieved from http://www.wscadv.org/docs/Mandated_to_Service.pdf
42.
MacyR.GiattinaM.ParishS.CrosbyC. (2010). Domestic violence and sexual assault services: Historical concerns and contemporary challenges. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 3-32.
43.
MarkowitzL. (2002). Paradoxes of professionalization: Parallel dilemmas in women’s organizations in the Americas. Gender and Society, 16, 941-958.
44.
MillerJ. (2008). Violence against urban African American girls: Challenges for feminist advocacy. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 1, 1-11.
45.
MoeA. (2000). Battered women in the restraining order process: Observations on a court advocacy program. Violence Against Women, 6, 606.
46.
MoeA. (2007). Silenced voices and structured survival: Battered women’s help seeking. Violence Against Women, 13, 676-699.
47.
National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs. (2006). Anti-lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender violence. Retrieved from www.ncavp.org
48.
NicholsA. J. (2011). Gendered organizations: Challenges for domestic violence victim advocates and feminist advocacy. Feminist Criminology, 6, 111-131.
49.
NicholsA. J. (2012). Survivor-defined practices to mitigate revictimization of battered women in the protective order process. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/088626051246824.
50.
NuriusP.MacyR.NwabuzorI.HoltV. (2011). Intimate partner survivors’ help-seeking and protection efforts: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 539-566.
OsthoffS. (2001). When battered women become defendants: Battered women charged with crimes. In RenzettiC.GoodsteinL. (Eds.), Women crime and criminal justice (pp. 232-242). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
54.
PotterH. (2008). Battle cries: Black women and intimate partner violence. New York, NY: New York University Press.
55.
RichieB. E. (2000). A Black feminist reflection on the antiviolence movement. Signs, 25, 1133-1137.
56.
RichieB. E. (2005). A Black feminist reflection on the anti-violence movement. In SokoloffN. (Ed.), Domestic violence at the margins (pp. 50-55). London, UK: Rutgers University Press.
57.
RodriguezN. (1988). Transcending bureaucracy: Feminist politics at a shelter for battered women. Gender and Society, 2, 214-227.
58.
Rowe-FinkbeinerK. (2004). The F-word: Feminism in jeopardy. Women, politics, and the future. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.
59.
SaathoffA.StoffelE. (1999). Community based domestic violence services. Domestic Violence and Children, 9, 97-110.
60.
SchechterS. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women’s movement. Boston, MA: South End.
61.
ShepardM.PenceE. (1999). Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
SmithA.RichieB.SudburyJ.WhiteJ., & the INCITE! Anthology Co-editors. (2006). The color of violence: Introduction. In INCITE! Women of color against violence (Eds.), Color of violence: The INCITE! anthology (pp. 1-10). Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
63.
SokoloffN. (2005). Domestic violence at the margins. London, UK: Rutgers University Press.
64.
SrinivasanM.DavisL. (1991). A shelter: An organization like any other?Affilia, 6, 38-57.
65.
SullivanC. M.BybeeD. I. (1999). Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners. Journal of Consult Clinical Psychology, 67, 43-53.
TierneyK. (1982). The battered women’s movement and creation of the wife beating problem. Social Problems, 29, 207-220.
68.
WathenC. N.MacMillanH. (2003). Interventions for violence against women. Scientific Review, 289, 589-600.
69.
WebsdaleN.JohnsonB. (1997). Reducing women battering: The role of structural approaches. Social Justice, 24, 54-81.
70.
WeiszA. N. (1999). Legal advocacy for domestic violence survivors: The power of an informative relationship. Families in Society, 80, 138-147.
71.
WestC.KantorG.JasinskiJ. (1998). Socio-demographic predictors and cultural barriers to help seeking behavior of Latinas and Anglo-American battered women. Violence and Victims, 13, 361-375.
72.
ZweigJ.BurtM. (2006). Predicting case outcomes and women’s perceptions of the legal system’s response to domestic violence and sexual assault: Does interaction between community agencies matter?Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17, 202-233.
73.
ZweigJ.BurtM. (2007). Predicting women’s perceptions of domestic violence and sexual assault agency helpfulness: What matters to program clients?Violence Against Women, 13, 1149-1178.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
