Research on intimate partner homicide has increased along with public awareness and policy responses toward domestic violence. The current study addresses the decline in gender-specific intimate partner homicides during a time marked by significant transformations in domestic violence legislation, including the enactment of the 1994 Violence Against Women’s Act. In an attempt to account for changes in intimate partner homicide during this time period, we examine the exposure reducing potential of domesticity, domestic violence resources, and females’ economic status, while also acknowledging their possible backlash/retaliation effects when accounting for inequalities in the economic statuses of males and females. By incorporating a pooled time-series design to model change, our research reveals changes between 1990 and 2000 in key theoretical predictors of domesticity, domestic violence resources, and economic deprivation significantly influence the trends in male-victim intimate partner homicide, but not female-victim intimate partner homicide for a large sample of 178 urban cities.
AllisonP. D. (1994). Using panel data to estimate the effects of events. Sociological Methods and Research, 23, 179-199.
2.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680.
3.
AvakameE. F. (1999). Females’ labor force participation and intimate femicide: An empirical assessment of the backlash hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 14, 277-291.
4.
BaileyW. C. (1984). Poverty, inequality, and city homicide rates: Some not so unexpected results. Criminology, 22, 531-550.
5.
BaileyW. C.PetersonR. D. (1995). Gender inequality and violence against women: The case of murder. In HaganJ.PetersonR. D. (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 175-205). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
BerkR. A.BerkS. F.LosekeD. R.RaumaD. (1983). Mutual combat and other family violence. In FinkelhorD.GellesR. J.HotalingG. T.StrausM. A. (Eds.), The dark side of families: Current family violence research (pp. 197-212). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
7.
BlauJ. R.BlauP. M. (1982). The cost of inequality: Metropolitan structure and violent crime. American Sociological Review, 47, 114-129.
8.
BlockC. R. (1985). The lethal violence in Chicago over seventeen years: Homicides known to the police, 1965-1981. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
9.
BlockC. R. (2000). The Chicago women’s health risk study. Risk of serious injury or death in intimate violence: A collaborative research project. Report to the National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.icjia.state.il.us/public/pdf/cwhrs/cwhrs.pdf
10.
BlockC. R.ChristakosA. (1995). Intimate partner homicide in Chicago over 29 years. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 496-526.
11.
BlumsteinA.WallmanJ. (2001). The crime drop in America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BoxS.HaleC. (1983). Liberation and female criminality in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology, 23, 35-49.
13.
BoxS.HaleC. (1984). Liberation/emancipation, economic marginalization, or less chivalry: The relevance of three theoretical arguments to female crime patterns in England and Wales, 1951-1980. Criminology, 22, 473-497.
14.
BraithwaiteJ. (1979). Inequality, crime, and public policy. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
15.
BrowneA. (1987). When battered women kill. New York, NY: Free Press.
16.
BrowneA.WilliamsK. R. (1989). Exploring the effect of resource availability and the likelihood of female-perpetrated homicides. Law and Society Review, 23, 75-94.
17.
BrowneA.WilliamsK. R. (1993). Gender, intimacy, and lethal violence. Gender & Society, 7, 78-98.
18.
BrushL. D. (1990). Violent acts and injurious outcomes in married couples: Methodological issues in the National Survey of Families and Households. Gender & Society, 4, 56-67.
19.
CampbellJ. C. (1992). “If I can’t have you, no one can”: Power and control in homicide of female partners. In RadfordJ.RussellD. E. H. (Eds.), Femicide: The politics of women killing (pp. 99-113). New York, NY: Twayne.
20.
ChimbosP. D. (1978). Marital violence: A study of interspouse homicide. San Francisco, CA: R&E Research Associates.
21.
CrowellN. A.BurgessA. W. (1996). Understanding violence against women. Washington, DC: Research Council National Academy Press.
22.
CumleyS. R.HeimerK. (2010, November). Economic disadvantage, welfare spending, and gendered arrests for violence: An analysis of cities, 1970-2000. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, CA.
23.
DalyM.WilsonM. (1988). Homicide. New York, NY: Aldine.
24.
DanielA. E.HarrisP. W. (1982). Female homicide offenders referred for pre-trial psychiatric examination: A descriptive study. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 10, 261-269.
25.
DeWeesM. A.ParkerK. F. (2003). Women, region, and types of homicide. Homicide Studies, 7, 368-393.
26.
DobashR. P.DobashR. E.WilsonM.DalyM. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 401-421.
27.
DuganL.NaginD. S.RosenfeldR. (1999). Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: The effects of changing domesticity, women’s status, and domestic violence resources. Homicide Studies, 3, 187-214.
28.
DuganL.NaginD. S.RosenfeldR. (2003). Exposure reduction or retaliation? The effects of domestic violence resources on intimate-partner homicide. Law & Society Review, 37, 169-198.
29.
DuroseM. R.Wolf HarlowC.LanganP.MotivansM.RantanaR. R.SmithE. L. (2005). Family violence statistics. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
30.
FaganJ.BrowneA. (1994). Violence between spouses and intimates: Physical aggression between women and men in intimate relationships. In ReissA. J.Jr.RothJ. A. (Eds.), Understanding and preventing violence. Volume 3: Social influences (pp. 115-292). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31.
FlewellingR. L.WilliamsK. R. (1999). Categorizing homicides: The use of disaggregated data in homicide research. In SmithM. D.ZahnM. A. (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 96-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
FoxJ. A. (2004). Missing data problems in the SHR. Homicide Studies, 8, 214-254.
33.
FoxJ. A. (2005). Uniform Crime Reports [United States]: Supplementary Homicide Reports, 1976-2002[Computer file] (Compiled by Northeastern University, College of Criminal Justice; ICPSR, Ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (Producer and Distributor).
34.
FoxJ. A.SwattM. L. (2009). Multiple imputation of Supplemental Homicide Reports, 1976-2005. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 51-71.
35.
FoxJ. A.ZawitzM. W. (2007). Homicide trends in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/htius.pdf
36.
Gallup-BlackA. (2005). Twenty years of rural and urban trends in family and intimate partner homicide. Homicide Studies, 9, 149-173.
37.
GreeneW. H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
38.
GoettingA. (1988). Patterns of homicide among women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 3-19.
39.
GoettingA. (1995). Homicide in families and other special populations. New York, NY: Springer.
40.
GreenfieldL. A.RandM. R.CravenD.KlausP. A.PerkinsC. A.RingelC.. . . FoxJ. A. (1998). Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, and girlfriends (NCJ-167237). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
41.
HausmanJ.HallB. H.GrilichesZ. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents–R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52, 909-938.
42.
HeimerK. (2000). The nature of crime: Continuity and change. Changes in the gender gap in crime and women’s economic marginalization. Criminal Justice, 1, 427-483.
43.
HeimerK.LauritsenJ. L.LynchJ. P. (2009). The national crime victimization survey and the gender gap in offending: Redux. Criminology, 47, 427-438.
44.
HeimerK.WittrockS. M.UnalH. (2005). The crimes of poverty: Economic marginalization and the gender gap in crime. In HeimerK.KruttschnittC. (Eds.), Gender and crime: Patterns in victimization and offending (pp. 115-138). New York, NY: New York University Press.
45.
HsaioC. (1986). Analysis of panel data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
46.
JohnsonD. R. (1995). Alternative methods for the quantitative analysis of panel data in family research: Pooled time-series models. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 1065-1077.
47.
Junger-TasJ.MarshallI. H. (1999). The self-report methodology in crime research. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of the research (Vol. 25, pp. 291-367). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
LaFreeG. (1999). Declining violent crime rates in the 1990s: Predicting crime booms and busts. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 145-168.
49.
LanganP. A.InnesC. A. (1986). Preventing domestic violence against women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
50.
LauritsenJ. L.HeimerK.LynchJ. P. (2009). Trends in the gender gap in violent offending: New evidence from the national crime victimization surveys. Criminology, 47, 361-399.
51.
LoftinC.McDowallD.XieM. (2008). Likely errors when linking supplemental homicide report records for large U.S. cities. Homicide Studies, 12, 234-248.
52.
MaddalaG. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
53.
MertonR. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
54.
MessnerS. F.DeaneG. D.AnselinL.Pearson-NelsonB. (2005). Locating the vanguard in rising and falling homicide rates across U.S. cities. Criminology, 43, 661-696.
55.
National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. (1991). 1991 national directory of domestic violence programs: A guide to community shelter, safe home and service programs. Washington, DC: Author.
56.
National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. (1999). 1999-2000 national directory of domestic violence programs: A guide to community shelter, safe home and service programs. Denver, CO: Author.
57.
NisbettR. E.CohenD. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview.
58.
PampelF. C.WilliamsK. R. (2000). Intimacy and homicide: Compensating for missing data in the SHR. Criminology, 38, 661-680.
59.
ParkerK. F. (2004). Industrial shift, polarized labor markets, and urban violence: Modeling the dynamics between the economic transformation and disaggregated homicide. Criminology, 42, 619-644.
60.
PaternosterR.BrameR.MazerolleP.PiqueroA. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 856-866.
61.
PaulsenD. J.BrewerV. E. (2000). The spousal SROK revisited: A comparison of Chicago and Houston intimate partner homicide ratios. Gender Issues, 18, 88-100.
62.
ReckdenwaldA.ParkerK. F. (2008). The influence of gender inequality and marginalization and types of female offending. Homicide Studies, 12, 208-226.
63.
RosenfeldR. (1997). Changing relationships between men and women: A note on the decline in intimate partner homicide. Homicide Studies, 1, 72-83.
64.
RosenfeldR. (2000). Patterns in adult homicide:1980-1995. In BlumsteinA.WallmanJ. (Eds.), The crime drop in America (pp. 130-163). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65.
RussellD. E. (1975). The politics of rape: The victim’s perspective. New York, NY: Stein and Day.
66.
SaundersD.BrowneA. (2000). Intimate partner homicide. In AmmermanR. T.HersenM. (Eds.), Case studies in family violence (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Plenum.
67.
SchwartzJ.SteffensmeierD.FeldmeyerB. (2009). Assessing trends in women’s violence via data triangulation: Arrests, convictions, incarcerations and victim reports. Social Problems, 56, 494-525.
68.
SchwartzJ.SteffensmeierD.ZhongH.AckermanJ. (2009). Trends in the gender gap in violence: Reevaluating NCVS and other evidence. Criminology, 47, 701-724.
69.
SchwartzM. D. (1987). Gender and injury in spousal assault. Sociological Forum, 20, 61-75.
70.
ShackelfordT. K. (2001). Cohabitation, marriage, and murder: Women-killing by male romantic partners. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 284-291.
71.
SilvermanR. A.MukherjeeS. K. (1987). Intimate homicide: An analysis of violence social relationships. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 5, 37-47.
72.
SmithP. H.MoraccoK. E.ButtsJ. D. (1998). Partner homicide in context. Homicide Studies, 2, 400-421.
73.
STATA. (2003). Cross-sectional time-series reference manual. College Station, TX: STATA Press.
74.
SteffensmeierD.AllanE. (1988). Sex disparities in arrests by residence, race, and age: An assessment of the gender convergence/crime hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 5, 53-80.
75.
SteffensmeierD.HaynieD. (2000a). Gender, structural disadvantage, and urban crime: Do macrosocial variables also explain female offending rates?Criminology, 38, 403-438.
76.
SteffensmeierD.HaynieD. (2000b). The structural sources of urban female violence in the United States. Homicide Studies, 4, 107-134.
77.
SteffensmeierD.StreifelC. (1992). Time-series analysis of the female percentage of arrests for property crimes, 1960-1985: A test of alternative explanations. Justice Quarterly, 9, 77-103.
78.
StetsJ. E.StrausM. A. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
79.
StoutK. D.BrownP. (1995). Legal and social differences between men and women who kill intimate partners. Affilia, 10, 194-205.
80.
StrausM. A. (1993). Physical assaults by wives: A major social problem. In GellesR. J.LosekeD. R. (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 67-87). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
81.
TolmanR. M.BennettL. W. (1990). A review of qualitative research on men who batter. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 87-118.
82.
TotmanJ. (1978). The murderess: A psychosocial study of criminal homicide. San Francisco, CA: R&E Research Associates.
83.
U.S. Bureau of Census. (1994). Census of population and housing, 1990. Summary tape file 1a and 3a. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
84.
U.S. Bureau of Census. (2003). Census of population and housing, 2000. Summary tape file 1 and 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
85.
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2002). Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: Police Employee (LEOKA) Data, 2000[Computer file] (Compiled by the U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation; ICPSR, Ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (Producer and Distributor).
86.
VieraitisL. M.WilliamsM. R. (2002). Assessing the impact of gender inequality on female homicide victimization across U.S. cities: A racially disaggregated analysis. Violence Against Women, 8, 35-63.
87.
VillarrealA. (2004). The social ecology of rural violence: Land scarcity, the organization of agricultural production, and the presence of the state. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 313-348.
88.
WalbyS. (1986). Patriarchy at work. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
89.
WellsW.DeLeon-GranadosW. (2004). The intimate partner homicide decline: Disaggregated trends, theoretical explanations, and policy implications. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15, 229-246.
90.
WhaleyR. B.MessnerS. F. (2002). Gender equality and gendered homicides. Homicide Studies, 6, 188-210.
91.
WilliamsK. R.FlewellingR. L. (1987). Family, acquaintance, and stranger homicide: Alternative procedures for rate calculations. Criminology, 25, 543-560.
92.
WilliamsK. R.FlewellingR. L. (1988). The social production of criminal homicide: A comparative study of disaggregated rates in American cities. American Sociological Review, 53, 421-431.
93.
WilliamsJ. E.HolmesK. A. (1981). The second assault: Rape and public attitudes. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
94.
WilsonM.DalyM.WrightC. (1993). Uxoricide in Canada: Demographic risk patterns. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 35, 263-291.
95.
WilsonM.JohnsonH.DalyM. (1995). Lethal and nonlethal violence against wives. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 331-361.
96.
WolfgangM. E. (1958). Patterns of criminal homicide. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
97.
WolfgangM. E. (1967). A sociological analysis of criminal homicide. In WolfgangM. E. (Ed.), Studies in homicide (pp. 15-28). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
