The progressive dissemination of isolated aortic valve repair (AVRep) and valve-sparing root (VSR) procedures has resulted in a cumulative expansion of the available literature. This work aims to synthesize the current knowledge and identify predictors of mortality and reintervention in patients undergoing such valve-preserving procedures.
Methods:
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in 2 databases (last search January 2025). Studies with ≥200 adult patients undergoing AVRep or VSR with a minimum mean follow-up ≥5 years were included. Short-term outcomes were summarized using weighted descriptive statistics. Forest plots, funnel plots, and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale were used to evaluate the risk of bias. Long-term survival and freedom from reoperation were analyzed through reconstructing individual patient data from Kaplan–Meier curves, and a mixed-effects Cox frailty model was used to identify study-level predictors of these endpoints.
Results:
There were 48 studies included, encompassing 20,914 patients with a mean weighted age of 52.42 (50.28 to 54.57) years. Early outcomes included hospital mortality (1.34% [1.04% to 1.73%]), bleeding (3.77% [2.76% to 5.13%]), myocardial ischemia (0.44% [0.26% to 0.77%]), pacemaker implantation (1.00% [0.63% to 1.59%]), neurologic events (1.27% [0.91% to 1.78%]), and postoperative residual aortic regurgitation (3.48% [1.90% to 6.29%]). Pooled survival at 1, 5, 10, and 20 years of follow-up was 96.8%, 92.5%, 83.8%, and 67%, respectively; freedom from reoperation at the same time points was 97.9%, 93.9%, 88.2%, and 77.5%, respectively. Factors such as older age, female sex, aortic dissection, and isolated valve repair were associated with higher mortality.
Conclusions:
These findings suggest that AVRep and VSR are associated with low early mortality and morbidity and excellent long-term outcomes. However, heterogeneity in definitions and endpoints across studies underlines the need for standardized definitions and conduction of properly designed randomized trials.
TuffierT and
CarrelA.Patching and section of the pulmonary orifice of the heart. J Exp Med1914; 20: 3–8.
2.
CabrolCCabrolAGuiraudonG, et al. Treatment of aortic insufficiency by means of aortic annuloplasty [in French]. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss1966; 59: 1305–1312.
IzumotoHKawazoeKKawaseT, et al. Subvalvular circular annuloplasty as a component of aortic valve repair. J Heart Valve Dis2002; 11: 383–385.
5.
SchneiderUAicherDMiuraY, et al. Suture annuloplasty in aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg2016; 101: 783–785.
6.
DavidTE and
FeindelCM.An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1992; 103: 617–622.
7.
SarsamMA and
YacoubM.Remodeling of the aortic valve anulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1993; 105: 435–438.
8.
LansacEDi CentaIVarnousS, et al. External aortic annuloplasty ring for valve-sparing procedures. Ann Thorac Surg2005; 79: 356–358.
9.
DavidTEDavidCMFeindelCM, et al. Reimplantation of the aortic valve at 20 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2017; 153: 232–238.
10.
YacoubMHGehlePChandrasekaranV, et al. Late results of a valve-preserving operation in patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta and root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1998; 115: 1080–1090.
11.
De PaulisR and
SalicaA. Surgical anatomy of the aortic valve and root-implications for valve repair. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2019; 8: 313–321.
12.
YoussefiPBregaCShraerN, et al. Isolated bicuspid aortic valve repair with double annuloplasty: how I teach it. Ann Thorac Surg2019; 108: 1596–1604.
13.
BoodhwaniMde KerchoveLGlineurD, et al. Repair-oriented classification of aortic insufficiency: impact on surgical techniques and clinical outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2009; 137: 286–294.
14.
WanXWangWLiuJ, et al. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol2014; 14: 135.
15.
GuyotPAdesAEOuwensMJ, et al. Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves. BMC Med Res Methodol2012; 12: 9.
16.
JahanyarJde KerchoveLArabkhaniB, et al. Three decades of reimplantation of the aortic valve-the Brussels experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2023; 12: 244–252.
17.
FeindelCMFanCSParkJ, et al. Reimplantation of the aortic valve in patients with tricuspid aortic valve: the Toronto General Hospital experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2023; 12: 237–243.
18.
DavidTEFeindelCMDavidCM, et al. A quarter of a century of experience with aortic valve-sparing operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2014; 148: 872–880.
19.
TamerSMastrobuoniSMomeniM, et al. Long-term experience with valve-sparing root reimplantation surgery in tricuspid aortic valve. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2020; 36: 71–80.
20.
SalemRZiererAKarimian-TabriziA, et al. Aortic valve repair for aortic insufficiency or dilatation: technical evolution and long-term outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg2020; 110: 1967–1973.
21.
EhrlichTAbelnKBBurgardC, et al. Twenty-five years of root remodelling for root aneurysm and tricuspid aortic valve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2023; 63: ezad137.
22.
SharmaVSuriRMDearaniJA, et al. Expanding relevance of aortic valve repair-is earlier operation indicated?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2014; 147: 100–107.
23.
GiebelsCSchulze-BergeJWagenpfeilG, et al. Prolapse repair for aortic regurgitation in tricuspid aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2024; 168: 1025–1034.
24.
ChauvetteVKluinJde KerchoveL, et al. Outcomes of valve-sparing surgery in heritable aortic disorders: results from the AVIATOR registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2022; 62: ezac366.
25.
YangBNortonELHobbsR, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of aortic root repair and replacement in patients undergoing acute type A aortic dissection repair: twenty-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2019; 157: 2125–2136.
26.
BeckmannEMartensAKruegerH, et al. Aortic valve-sparing root replacement (David): learning curve and impact on outcome. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2020; 30: 754–761.
27.
RamELauCDimagliA, et al. Long-term durability of valve-sparing root replacement in patients with and without connective tissue disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2024; 168: 735–743.
28.
BeckmannEKaufeldTMartensA, et al. Is aortic valve-sparing root reimplantation (David-I) justified in cardiac redo surgery?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2022; 35: ivac058.
29.
BeckmannEMartensAKrugerH, et al. Aortic valve-sparing root replacement with Tirone E. David’s reimplantation technique: single-centre 25-year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2021; 60: 642–648.
30.
KarliovaISchneiderUEhrlichT, et al. Results of pericardial patches in tricuspid and bicuspid aortic cusp repair. Ann Thorac Surg2020; 109: 728–735.
31.
PatlollaSHSaranNDearaniJA, et al. Outcomes and risk factors of late failure of valve-sparing aortic root replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2022; 164: 493–501.
32.
ManganielloSSoquetJMugnierA, et al. David procedure: a 21-year experience with 300 patients. Ann Thorac Surg2023; 115: 1403–1410.
33.
DubostCTomasiJDucroixA, et al. AORTLANTIC: French registry of aortic valve-sparing root replacement, preliminary multicentre results from western France. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2022; 35.
34.
ShresthaMBoethigDKrugerH, et al. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement using a straight tube graft (David I procedure). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2023; 166: 1387–1397.
35.
FroedeLAbelnKBEhrlichT, et al. Twenty-five years’ experience with root remodeling and bicuspid aortic valve repair. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2022; 11: 418–425.
36.
LeontyevSSchambergerLDavierwalaPM, et al. Early and late results after David vs Bentall procedure: a propensity matched analysis. Ann Thorac Surg2020; 110: 120–126.
37.
ZeeshanAIdreesJJJohnstonDR, et al. Durability of aortic valve cusp repair with and without annular support. Ann Thorac Surg2018; 105: 739–748.
38.
EhrlichTAbelnKBFroedeL, et al. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement-for all patients?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2024; 168: 1403–1413.
39.
YokawaKIkenoYKodaY, et al. Valve-sparing root replacement in elderly patients with annuloaortic ectasia. Ann Thorac Surg2019; 107: 1342–1347.
40.
KlotzSStockSSieversHH, et al. Survival and reoperation pattern after 20 years of experience with aortic valve-sparing root replacement in patients with tricuspid and bicuspid valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2018; 155: 1403–1411.
41.
DavidTEFeindelCMWebbGD, et al. Long-term results of aortic valve-sparing operations for aortic root aneurysm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2006; 132: 347–354.
42.
KvittingJPKariFAFischbeinMP, et al. David valve-sparing aortic root replacement: equivalent mid-term outcome for different valve types with or without connective tissue disorder. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2013; 145: 117–127.
43.
SvenssonLGAl KindiAHVivacquaA, et al. Long-term durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg2014; 97: 1539–1548.
44.
LausbergHFAicherDKissingerA, et al. Valve repair in aortic regurgitation without root dilatation—aortic valve repair. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2006; 54: 15–20.
45.
HolubecTRashidHHeckerF, et al. Early- and longer-term outcomes of David versus Florida sleeve procedure: propensity-matched comparison. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2022; 62: ezac104.
46.
DavidTEDavidCMOuzounianM, et al. A progress report on reimplantation of the aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2021; 161: 890–899.
47.
KuniharaTAicherDRodionychevaS, et al. Preoperative aortic root geometry and postoperative cusp configuration primarily determine long-term outcome after valve-preserving aortic root repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2012; 143: 1389–1395.
48.
SharmaVJKangarajahAYangA, et al. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement: long-term variables significantly associated with mortality and morbidity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2025; 169: 68–77.
49.
MakkinejadABrownBAhmadRA, et al. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement technique: Valsalva graft versus two straight tubular grafts. Cardiol Res Pract2023; 2023: 4076881.
50.
EsakiJLeshnowerBGBinongoJN, et al. Clinical outcomes of the David V valve-sparing root replacement compared with bioprosthetic valve-conduits for aortic root aneurysms. Ann Thorac Surg2017; 103: 1824–1832.
51.
GuoMHColeEFeiLYN, et al. Preoperative left ventricular end-systolic dimension predicts occurrence of aortic insufficiency following aortic valve preservation and repair surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2022; 164: 1069–1076.
52.
de MeesterCVanoversheldeJLJahanyarJ, et al. Long-term durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair: a comparison of 2 annuloplasty techniques. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2021; 60: 286–294.
53.
AicherDFriesRRodionychevaS, et al. Aortic valve repair leads to a low incidence of valve-related complications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2010; 37: 127–132.
54.
LiebrichMCharitosEStadlerC, et al. Additional cusp reconstruction does not compromise valve durability and mid-term survival after the David procedure: results from 449 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2020; 58: 1072–1079.
55.
SvenssonLGDeglurkarIUngJ, et al. Aortic valve repair and root preservation by remodeling, reimplantation, and tailoring: technical aspects and early outcome. J Card Surg2007; 22: 473–479.
56.
UrbanskiPPIrimieVJankulowskiA, et al. Long-term outcomes after aortic root repair using selective sinus replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2023; 166: 422–431.
57.
ChirichilliIScaffaRIraceFG, et al. Twenty-year experience of aortic valve reimplantation using the Valsalva graft. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2023; 63.
58.
JasinskiMJKosiorowskaKGocolR, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve repair: outcomes after 17 years of experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2021; 60: 1053–1061.
59.
YerokunBAVallabhajosyulaPVeksteinAM, et al. Long-term outcomes of aortic root operations in the United States among Medicare beneficiaries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2023; 165: 554–565.
60.
CoselliJSVolguinaIVLeMaireSA, et al. Midterm outcomes of aortic root surgery in patients with Marfan syndrome: a prospective, multicenter, comparative study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2023; 165: 1790–1799.
61.
AnandJSchafsteddeMGiebelsC, et al. Significance of effective height and mechanism of regurgitation in tricuspid aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg2023; 115: 429–435.
62.
KariFADollKNHemmerW, et al. Survival and freedom from aortic valve-related reoperation after valve-sparing aortic root replacement in 1015 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2016; 22: 431–438.
63.
MartensABeckmannEKaufeldT, et al. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (David I procedure) in Marfan disease: single-centre 20-year experience in more than 100 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2019; 55: 476–483.
64.
KappenbergerL. Proceedings document from the Policy Conference on Pacemaker and ICD Performance. In: Conference Proceedings Document From the Policy Conference on Pacemaker and ICD Performance, Washington, DC, 2005. Washington (DC): Heart Rhythm Society: 17.
ZeeshanAIdreesJJJohnstonDR, et al. Durability of aortic valve cusp repair with and without annular support. Ann Thorac Surg2018; 105: 739–748.
67.
MohtyDOrszulakTASchaffHV, et al. Very long-term survival and durability of mitral valve repair for mitral valve prolapse. Circulation2001; 104: I1–I7.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
