NisivacoSKitaharaHBhasinR, et al. A decade of robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary bypass (TECAB) at a single institution: outcomes with 10-year follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2025; 169: 1753–1760.
2.
LeonardJRRahoumaMAbouarabAA, et al. Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of the current evidence. Int J Cardiol2018; 261: 42–46.
3.
BalkhyHHNisivacoSKitaharaH, et al. Robotic advanced hybrid coronary revascularization: outcomes with two internal thoracic artery grafts and stents. JTCVS Tech2022; 16: 76–88.
4.
AlJamalYBurginRKitaharaH, et al. Inexpensive and easy to set up robotic cardiac simulator offers “unlimited” endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting experience: proof of concept. Innovations2023; 18: 419–423.
5.
AljamalYSaleemHPrabhakarN, et al. Group video feedback is an effective and efficient tool for enhancing skills of surgical interns. J Surg Res2020; 251: 248–253.
6.
FannJICalhoonJHCarpenterAJ, et al. Simulation in coronary artery anastomosis early in cardiothoracic surgical residency training: the Boot Camp experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2010; 139: 1275–1281.
7.
JonssonABinongoJPatelP, et al. Mastering the learning curve for robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg2023; 115: 1118–1125.
8.
GrossiSCattoniMFilipponiL, et al. Training simulator efficacy in developing thoracic and general surgical skills in a residency programme: a pilot study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2024; 65: ezae044.
