KimK-BKangCHChangW-I, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass with complete avoidance of aortic manipulation. Ann Thorac Surg2002; 74: S1377–S1382.
2.
ZhaoDFEdelmanJJSecoM, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting with and without manipulation of the ascending aorta: a network meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol2017; 69: 924–936.
3.
PuskasJDWinstonADWrightCE, et al. Stroke after coronary artery operation: incidence, correlates, outcome, and cost. Ann Thorac Surg2000; 69: 1053–1056.
4.
JannatiM.Risk factors for stroke post coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a review of literature. Med Clínica Práctica2024; 7: 100405.
5.
ManabeSFukuiTMiyajimaK, et al. Impact of proximal anastomosis procedures on stroke in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Card Surg2009; 24: 644–649.
6.
LeeRMatsutaniNPolimenakosAC, et al. Preoperative noncontrast chest computed tomography identifies potential aortic emboli. Ann Thorac Surg2007; 84: 38–42.
7.
den HarderAMde HeerLMMeijerRCA, et al. Effect of computed tomography before cardiac surgery on surgical strategy, mortality and stroke. Eur J Radiol2016; 85: 744–750.
8.
MerloAChenKDeoS, et al. Does routine preoperative computed tomography imaging provide clinical utility in patients undergoing primary cardiac surgery?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2017; 25: 659–662.
9.
HeadSJMilojevicMDaemenJ, et al. Stroke rates following surgical versus percutaneous coronary revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol2018; 72: 386–398.
10.
IrqsusiMSchenkZuSchweinsbergTJohnsonFA, et al. Prediction of stroke reconvalescence after coronary bypass surgery indicated by CT scan parameters. J Card Surg2022; 37: 3133–3147.
11.
SunXLindsayJMonseinLH, et al. Silent brain injury after cardiac surgery: a review: cognitive dysfunction and magnetic resonance imaging diffusion-weighted imaging findings. J Am Coll Cardiol2012; 60: 791–797.
12.
KulasonKNouchiRHoshikawaY, et al. Indication of cognitive change and associated risk factor after thoracic surgery in the elderly: a pilot study. Front Aging Neurosci2017; 9: 396.
SandnerSENolzRLoeweC, et al. Routine preoperative aortic computed tomography angiography is associated with reduced risk of stroke in coronary artery bypass grafting: a propensity-matched analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2020; 57: 684–690.
15.
MillerCLKocherMKoweekLH, et al. Use of computed tomography (CT) for preoperative planning in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). J Card Surg2022; 37: 4150–4157.
16.
AlbackerTBAlhothaliAMAlhomeidanM, et al. Does preoperative screening with computed tomography of the chest decrease risk of stroke in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Quant Imaging Med Surg2023; 13: 2507–2513.
17.
van der LindenJHadjinikolaouLBergmanP, et al. Postoperative stroke in cardiac surgery is related to the location and extent of atherosclerotic disease in the ascending aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol2001; 38: 131–135.
18.
RoachGWKanchugerMManganoCM, et al. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Multicenter study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators. N Engl J Med1996; 335: 1857–1863.
19.
IkramAMohiuddinHZiaA, et al. Does epiaortic ultrasound screening reduce perioperative stroke in patients undergoing coronary surgery? A topical review. J Clin Neurosci2018; 50: 30–34.
20.
Van ZaaneBZuithoffNPAReitsmaJB, et al. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography for assessment of atherosclerosis in the ascending aorta in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand2008; 52: 1179–1187.
21.
RoyseCRoyseABlakeD, et al. Screening the thoracic aorta for atheroma: a comparison of manual palpation, transesophageal and epiaortic ultrasonography. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1998; 4: 347–350.
22.
RoyseAGRoyseCF.Epiaortic ultrasound assessment of the aorta in cardiac surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol2009; 23: 335–341.
23.
BiancariFSantiniFTauriainenT, et al. Epiaortic ultrasound to prevent stroke in coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg2020; 109: 294–301.
24.
RosenbergerPShernanSKLöfflerM, et al. The influence of epiaortic ultrasonography on intraoperative surgical management in 6051 cardiac surgical patients. Ann Thorac Surg2008; 85: 548–553.
25.
ParkK-HLeeHYLimC, et al. Clinical impact of computerised tomographic angiography performed for preoperative evaluation before coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2010; 37: 1346–1352.
26.
MossEPuskasJDThouraniVH, et al. Avoiding aortic clamping during coronary artery bypass grafting reduces postoperative stroke. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2015; 149: 175–180.
27.
EmmertMYSeifertBWilhelmM, et al. Aortic no-touch technique makes the difference in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2011; 142: 1499–1506.
28.
BulutAİnceİSungurÜP, et al. Sequential left internal mammary artery grafting in combination with the aortic no-touch technique. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol2022; 19: 135–140.
29.
GaudinoMFLSpadaccioC and
TaggartDP. State-of-the-art coronary artery bypass grafting: patient selection, graft selection, and optimizing outcomes. Interv Cardiol Clin2019; 8: 173–198.
30.
Sousa-UvaMNeumannF-JAhlssonA, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2019; 55: 4–90.
31.
AmabileATorregrossaGWilliamsE, et al. Mastering off-pump, total arterial coronary artery bypass grafting: a step-by-step approach. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg2020; 2020.
32.
GaudinoMFLSandnerSBonalumiG, et al. How to build a multi-arterial coronary artery bypass programme: a stepwise approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2020; 58: 1111–1117.
33.
VallelyMPSecoMRamponiF, et al. Total-arterial, anaortic, off-pump coronary artery surgery: why, when, and how. JTCVS Tech2021; 10: 140–148.
34.
SirinG.Surgical strategies for severely atherosclerotic (porcelain) aorta during coronary artery bypass grafting. World J Cardiol2021; 13: 309–324.
35.
HamasakiAUchidaTKurodaY, et al. Piggyback anastomosis using a single Heartstring device: a low-invasiveness, low-cost technique. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg2019; 2019.
36.
HayashiYItoTMaekawaA, et al. Effect of modified proximal anastomosis of the free right internal thoracic artery: piggyback and foldback techniques. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2016; 22: 265–272.
37.
YanagawaBOrozco-SevillaVPawaleA, et al. Piggyback technique facilitates off-pump coronary artery bypass graft by using a proximal anastamostic device with arterial conduits. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2015; 150: 725–727.
38.
SirinGSarkislaliKKonakciM, et al. Extraanatomical coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severely atherosclerotic (porcelain) aorta. J Cardiothorac Surg2013; 8: 86.
39.
DemirsoyEUnalMArbatliH, et al. Extra-anatomic coronary artery bypass graftings in patients with porcelain aorta. J Cardiovasc Surg2004; 45: 111–115.
40.
UyarIDemirTPolatA, et al. Innominate artery as an alternative site for proximal anastomoses in patients with a severely calcified aorta. J Card Surg2013; 28: 228–232.
41.
GuttiRPhadkeAUGoliNR, et al. Minimal access coronary artery bypass in high grade aortic atheroma utilising left axillary artery for proximal anastomosis. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2017; 33: 38–40.
42.
MatsudaNKamihiraSKanaokaY, et al. Off-pump axillo-coronary artery bypass grafting with porcelain aorta. J Card Surg2005; 20: 586–588.
43.
BittnerHBSavittMA.Management of porcelain aorta and calcified great vessels in coronary artery bypass grafting with off-pump and no-touch technology. Ann Thorac Surg2001; 72: 1378–1380.
44.
KovacevićPVelickiLRedzekA, et al. An unusual origin of proximal coronary bypass anastomosis in a patient with porcelain aorta: how we solved the problem. Med Pregl2011; 64: 215–218.
45.
AgrifoglioMBariliFPorquedduM, et al. Left common carotid artery as inflow site in coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg2006; 82: 2298–2300.
46.
HerzIMohrRAviramG, et al. The right internal thoracic artery and right gastroepiploic artery: alternative sites for proximal anastomosis in patients with atherosclerotic calcified aorta. Heart Surg Forum2004; 7: E481–E484.
47.
OchiMHatoriNFujiiM, et al. Limited flow capacity of the right gastroepiploic artery graft: postoperative echocardiographic and angiographic evaluation. Ann Thorac Surg2001; 71: 1210–1214.
48.
CoulsonABakhshayS.Clinical concepts: subclavian artery origin for a coronary bypass graft. Contemp Surg1997; 55: 65–66.
49.
AthanasiouTKapetanakisEIRaoC, et al. Axillary artery to left anterior descending coronary artery bypass with an externally stented graft: a technical report. J Cardiothorac Surg2008; 3: 6.
50.
BonattiJCoulsonASBakhshaySA, et al. The subclavian and axillary arteries as inflow vessels for coronary artery bypass grafts—combined experience from three cardiac surgery centers. Heart Surg Forum2000; 3: 307–312.
51.
MoustafaRRAntounNMCouldenRA, et al. Stroke attributable to a calcific embolus from the brachiocephalic trunk. Stroke2006; 37: e6–e8.
52.
TarakjiAMSinclairMC.Should axillary artery to coronary artery bypass be part of the cardiac surgeon’s armamentarium?Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2007; 32: 65–68.
53.
GaudinoMSandnerSDi GiammarcoG, et al. The use of intraoperative transit time flow measurement for coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review of the evidence and expert opinion statements. Circulation2021; 144: 1160–1171.
54.
KieserTMTaggartDP.The use of intraoperative graft assessment in guiding graft revision. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2018; 7: 652–662.
55.
JovinDGKatlapsGJ and
SumptionKF.Coronary artery bypass graft markers: history, usage, and effects. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2020; 68: 453–458.
56.
ShaniLKernerA and
BolotinG.A simple method for proximal anastomoses marking during CABG for future coronary angiography. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann2015; 23: 751–753.
57.
MorabitoSPistolesiVBenedettiG, et al. Incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury associated with diagnostic or interventional coronary angiography. J Nephrol2012; 25: 1098–1107.
58.
TribbleCTemanN.Sewing proximals on the ascending aorta during CABG operations. Heart Surg Forum2022; 25: E330–E339.
59.
PingpohCSiepeMBurgerK, et al. Impact of proximal radiopaque coronary bypass graft markers on postbypass surgery coronary angiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2018; 155: 1565–1572.
60.
EisenhauerMDMalikJACoyleLC, et al. Impact of aorto-coronary graft markers on subsequent graft patency: a retrospective review. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn1997; 42: 259–261.
61.
OlenchockSAKarmpaliotisDGibsonWJ, et al. Impact of saphenous vein graft radiographic markers on clinical events and angiographic parameters. Ann Thorac Surg2008; 85: 520–524.
