SalengerRAdNGrantMC, et al. Maximizing minimally invasive cardiac surgery with enhanced recovery (ERAS). Innovations2024; 19: 371–379.
2.
SuriRMBurkhartHMDalyRC, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair for all prolapse subsets using techniques identical to open valvuloplasty: establishing the benchmark against which percutaneous interventions should be judged. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2011; 142: 970–979.
3.
NissenAPMillerCCIIIThouraniVH, et al. Less invasive mitral surgery versus conventional sternotomy stratified by mitral pathology. Ann Thorac Surg2021; 111: 819–827.
4.
AkowuahEFMaierRHHancockHC, et al. Minithoracotomy vs conventional sternotomy for mitral valve repair: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA2023; 329: 1957–1966.
5.
GillinovAMMihaljevicTJavadikasgariH, et al. Early results of robotically assisted mitral valve surgery: analysis of the first 1000 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2018; 155: 82–91.
6.
ModiPHassanA and
ChitwoodWRJr.Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2008; 34: 943–952.
7.
GrantSWHickeyGLModiP, et al. Propensity-matched anlaysis of minimally invasive approach versus sternotomy for mitral valve surgery. Heart2019; 105: 783–789.
8.
Al ShamryAJegadenMAshafyS, et al. Minithoracotomy versus sternotomy in mitral valve surgery: meta-analysis from recent matched and randomized studies. J Cardiothorac Surg2023; 18: 101.
9.
MossEHalkosMEBinongoJN, et al. Prevention of unilateral pulmonary edema complicating robotic mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg2017; 103: 98–104.
10.
WilliamsJBMcConnellGAllenderJE, et al. One-year results from the first US-based enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERAS Cardiac) program. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2019; 157: 1881–1888.
11.
LiMZhangJGanTJ, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2018; 54: 491–497.
