Self-Practice Program for Beating-Heart Minimally Invasive Coronary Anastomosis Using a Homemade Low-Fidelity Simulator: A Proof of Concept

Abstract

Objective:

We evaluated the effectiveness of a consistent and structured self-practice coronary anastomosis program using a homemade low-fidelity beating-heart simulator.

Methods:

An intermediary trainee was subjected to an 8-week structured self-practice program. The program was divided into 2 parts of nonbeating and beating practices with a minimum number of timed anastomoses. Each part was followed by an assessment using an objective skills assessment tool score. The beating-heart simulator was built using motorized toy blocks connected wirelessly to a smartphone application. This was coded to enable rate selection. A junior consultant was compared to the subject at the end of the program. Both were tasked to perform 1 coronary anastomosis for both off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and minimally invasive CAB (MICS) setup. The primary outcomes were anastomotic time and score compared with the junior consultant. Secondary outcomes were progression of anastomotic time and score throughout the program.

Results:

Overall performance of the studied subject approached the performance of the junior consultant in terms of time (OPCAB, 489 vs 605 s; MICS, 712 vs 652 s) and scores (OPCAB, 21 vs 20.7; MICS, 19 vs 20.6). There were inverse correlations between anastomosis time and number of practices for both nonbeating and beating anastomoses. Overall improvement was observed in terms of assessment scoring by 26.6%.

Conclusions:

A structured self-practice program using an affordable and accessible simulator was able to help trainees overcome the MICS anastomosis learning curve quicker when introduced earlier. This may encourage earlier adoption of MICS among surgeons.

Visual abstract

Keywords

training simulation simulator coronary anastomosis MICS CABG OPCAB

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Morrell Scott

Lotto

Spencer

, et al. Risk factors for post sternotomy wound complications across the patient journey: a systematised review of the literature. Heart Lung 2022; 55: 89–101.

Wang

, et al. Analysis of sternal healing after median sternotomy in low risk patients at midterm follow-up: retrospective cohort study from two centres. J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 14: 193.

Marin-Cuartas

Sá

Torregrossa

, et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery surgery: robotic and nonrobotic minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass techniques. JTCVS Tech 2021; 10: 170–177.

Ruel

Shariff

Lapierre

, et al. Results of the Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Angiographic Patency Study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147: 203–208.

Ruel

Nonsternotomy multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: a key development in cardiac surgery. JTCVS Tech 2021; 10: 162–167.

Qureshi

and Ruel

The 7 pillars of multivessel minimally invasive coronary surgery. Innovations 2021; 16: 216–217.

Gaudino

Bakaeen

Davierwala

, et al. New strategies for surgical myocardial revascularization. Circulation 2018; 138: 2160–2168.

Sergeant

and De Raet

Learning and training complex coronary surgery. JTCVS Tech 2020; 3: 240–244.

Feins

Burkhart

Conte

, et al. Simulation-based training in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 103: 312–321.

10.

Abdel Shafi

Sheikh

and Awad

WI.

Comparison of cardiothoracic surgical training before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. JTCVS Open 2021; 7: 394–410.

11.

Fuller

Vaporciyan

Dearani

, et al. COVID-19 disruption in cardiothoracic surgical training: an opportunity to enhance education. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 110: 1443–1446.

12.

Odell

Macke

Tchantchaleishvili

, et al. Resident perception of technical skills education and preparation for independent practice. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100: 2305–2313.

13.

Ling

and Zhao

Experience with porcine beating heart simulator for coronary artery bypass surgery residences training. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 161: 1878–1885.

14.

Kelly

Iyengar

Patrick

, et al. Cardiac surgery simulation - part 1: basic surgical skills. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 2020.

15.

Fann

Caffarelli

Georgette

, et al. Improvement in coronary anastomosis with cardiac surgery simulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 136: 1486–1491.

16.

Sardari Nia

Daemen

JHT

and Maessen

. Development of a high-fidelity minimally invasive mitral valve surgery simulator. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 157: 1567–1574.

17.

O’Dwyer

Fleming

Ahern

, et al. Objective improvement with coronary anastomosis simulation training: meta-analysis. BJS Open 2022; 6: zrab147.

18.

Ericsson

Krampe

and Tesch-Römer

The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev 1993; 100: 363–406.

19.

Enter

Lou

Hui

, et al. Practice improves performance on a coronary anastomosis simulator, attending surgeon supervision does not. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149: 12–17.

20.

Takahashi

Tanaka

Namaguchi

, et al. Remote simulator training of coronary artery bypass grafting during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. JTCVS Open 2021; 8: 524–533.

21.

Korte

Merz

Kirchhoff

, et al. Train early and with deliberate practice: simple coronary surgery simulation platform results in fast increase in technical surgical skills in residents and students. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2020; 30: 871–878.

22.

Zhao

, et al. Simulation training in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart Surg Forum 2020; 23: E774–E780.

23.

Yasuda

Van den Eynde

Vandendriessche

, et al. Implementation of a beating heart system for training in off-pump and minimally invasive coronary artery bypass. BMC Surg 2021; 21: 26.

24.

Norman

Dore

and Grierson

The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Med Educ 2012; 46: 636–647.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

14.32 MB