JolliffeJMotenSTripathyA, et al. Perceval valve intermediate outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis at 5-year follow-up. J Cardiothorac Surg2023; 18: 129.
2.
MecoMMontisciAMiceliA, et al. Sutureless Perceval aortic valve versus conventional stented bioprostheses: meta-analysis of postoperative and midterm results in isolated aortic valve replacement. J Am Heart Assoc2018; 7: e006091.
3.
SolinasMBianchiGChiaramontiF, et al. Right anterior mini-thoracotomy and sutureless valves: the perfect marriage. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2020; 9: 305–313.
4.
FischleinTFolliguetTMeurisB, et al. Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2021; 161: 920–932.
5.
BerrettaPAndreasMCarrelTP, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with sutureless and rapid deployment valves: a report from an international registry (Sutureless and Rapid Deployment International Registry). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2019; 56: 793–799.
6.
LabordeFFischleinTHakim-MeibodiK, et al. Clinical and haemodynamic outcomes in 658 patients receiving the Perceval sutureless aortic valve: early results from a prospective European multicentre study (the Cavalier Trial). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2016; 49: 978–986.
7.
ShresthaMFischleinTMeurisB, et al. European multicentre experience with the sutureless Perceval valve: clinical and haemodynamic outcomes up to 5 years in over 700 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2016; 49: 234–241.
8.
FabreORadutoiuMCarjaliuI, et al. Recent improvement in operative techniques lead to lower pacemaker rate after Perceval implant. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2022; 35: ivac182.
9.
MeurisBLamberigtsM and
SzecelD. The importance of sizing in sutureless valves. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2022; 35: ivac206.
10.
TascaGVismaraRManginiA, et al. Comparison of the performance of a sutureless bioprosthesis with two pericardial stented valves on small annuli: an in vitro study. Ann Thorac Surg2017; 103: 139–144.
11.
GlauberMMiceliA and
di BaccoL. Sutureless and rapid deployment valves: implantation technique from A to Z-the Perceval valve. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2020; 9: 330–340.
12.
BaertJAstarciPNoirhommeP, et al. The risk of oversizing with sutureless bioprosthesis in small aortic annulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2017; 153: 270–272.
13.
CerilloAGAmorettiFMarianiM, et al. Increased gradients after aortic valve replacement with the Perceval valve: the role of oversizing. Ann Thorac Surg2018; 106: 121–128.
14.
ConcistreGBianchiGMargaryanR, et al. Ten-year experience with sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis: single-centre analysis in 1157 implants. J Cardiovasc Med2023; 24: 506–513.
15.
GersakBGlauberMBouchardD, et al. Oversizing increases pacemaker implantation rate after sutureless minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Innovations2020; 15: 449–455.
16.
MakkarRRFontanaGJilaihawiH, et al. Possible subclinical leaflet thrombosis in bioprosthetic aortic valves. N Engl J Med2015; 373: 2015–2024.
17.
SzecelDLamberigtsMRegaF, et al. Avoiding oversizing in sutureless valves leads to lower transvalvular gradients and less permanent pacemaker implants postoperatively. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2022; 35: ivac157.
18.
BerrettaPMeurisBKappertU, et al. Sutureless versus rapid deployment aortic valve replacement: results from a multicenter registry. Ann Thorac Surg2022; 114: 758–765.
19.
FischleinTMeurisBFolliguetT, et al. Midterm outcomes with a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis in a prospective multicenter cohort study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2022; 164: 1772–1780.
20.
SantarpinoGBerrettaPKappertU, et al. Minimally invasive redo aortic valve replacement: results from a multicentric registry (SURD-IR). Ann Thorac Surg2020; 110: 553–557.
21.
SzecelD and
MeurisB. Long-term outcome with sutureless valves: 12 years of Perceval experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2020; 9: 322–324.
22.
BhushanSHuangXLiY, et al. Paravalvular leak after transcatheter aortic valve implantation its incidence, diagnosis, clinical implications, prevention, management, and future perspectives: a review article. Curr Probl Cardiol2022; 47: 100957.
23.
BlankePReinohlJSchlensakC, et al. Prosthesis oversizing in balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation is associated with contained rupture of the aortic root. Circ Cardiovasc Interv2012; 5: 540–548.
24.
GrieseDPReentsWKerberS, et al. Emergency cardiac surgery during transfemoral and transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence, reasons, management, and outcome of 411 patients from a single center. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv2013; 82: E726–E733.
25.
HorehledovaBMihlCHendriksBMF, et al. Do CTA measurements of annular diameter, perimeter and area result in different TAVI prosthesis sizes?Int J Cardiovasc Imaging2018; 34: 1819–1829.
26.
KothapalliPRBallmoosMCWChinnaduraiP, et al. Virtual implantation using 3D CT image fusion for preoperative sizing of sutureless aortic valves. Innovations2019; 14(2_Suppl): 29S.
27.
RamchandaniMKWyler von BallmoosMC and
ReardonMJ. Minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement through a right anterior thoracotomy: how I teach it. Ann Thorac Surg2019; 107: 19–23.
