SmithCRLeonMBMackMJ, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med2011; 364: 2187–2198.
2.
AdamsDHPopmaJJReardonMJ, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med2014; 370: 1790–1798.
3.
LeonMBSmithCRMackMJ, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med2016; 374: 1609–1620.
4.
PopmaJJDeebGMYakubovSJ, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med2019; 380: 1706–1715.
5.
MackMJLeonMBThouraniVH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med2019; 380: 1695–1705.
6.
ReardonMJVan MieghemNMPopmaJJ, et al. Surgical or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med2017; 376: 1321–1331.
7.
AllenKBChhatriwallaAKCohenD, et al. Transcarotid versus transapical and transaortic access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg2019; 108: 715–722.
8.
KirkerEKorngoldEHodsonRW, et al. Transcarotid versus subclavian/axillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with SAPIEN 3. Ann Thorac Surg2020; 110: 1892–1897.
9.
AllenKBChhatriwallaAKSaxonJ, et al. Transcarotid versus transthoracic access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2022; 164: 506–515.
10.
ThouraniVHLiCDevireddyC, et al. High-risk patients with intraoperative aortic stenosis: use of transapical, transaortic, and transcarotid techniques. Ann Thorac Surg2015; 99: 817–825.
11.
ThouraniVHJensenHABabaliarosV, et al. Transapical and transaortic transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States. Ann Thorac Surg2015; 100: 1718–1726.
12.
CiucaCTarantiniGLatibA, et al. Trans-subclavian versus transapical access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a multicenter study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv2016; 87: 332–338.
13.
PetronioASDe CarloMBedogniF, et al. 2-year results of CoreValve implantation through the subclavian access: a propensity-matched comparison with the femoral access. J Am Coll Cardiol2012; 60: 502–507.
14.
ReardonMJAdamsDHCoselliJS, et al. Self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement using alternative access sites in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis deemed extreme risk of surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2014; 148: 2869–2876.
15.
DahleTGKanekoT and
McCabeJM. Outcomes following subclavian and axillary artery access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Society of the Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT Registry Report. JACC Cardiovasc Interv2019; 12: 662–669.
16.
AllenKWatsonDVoraA, et al. TCT-606 transcarotid vs transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding, supra-annular valve. J Am Coll Cardiol2022; 80(12 Suppl): B249.
17.
ModineTSudreADelhayeC, et al. Transcutaneous aortic valve implantation using the left carotid access: feasibility and early clinical outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg2012; 93: 1489–1494.
18.
AzmounAAmabileNRamadanR, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation through carotid artery access under local anesthesia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2014; 46: 693–698.
19.
MylotteDSudreATeigerE, et al. Transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve replacement: feasibility and safety. JACC Cardiovasc Interv2016; 9: 472–480.
20.
KirkerEBHodsonRWSpinelliKJ, et al. The carotid artery as a preferred alternative access route for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg2017; 104: 621–629.
21.
OvertchoukPThierryFPinaudF, et al. Transcarotid approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the SAPIEN 3 prosthesis: a multicenter French registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv2019; 12: 413–419.
22.
GreenbaumABBabaliarosVCChenMY, et al. Transcaval access and closure for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective investigation. J Am Coll Cardiol2017; 69: 511–521.
23.
LedermanRJBabaliarosVCLiskoJC, et al. Transcaval versus transaxillary TAVR in contemporary practice: a propensity-weighted analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv2022; 15: 965–975.
24.
RankaSLahanSChhatriwallaAK, et al. Network meta-analysis comparing the short and long-term outcomes of alternative access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Cardiovasc Revasc Med2022; 40: 1–10.
25.
HameedIOakleyCTHameedNUF, et al. Alternate accesses for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a network meta-analysis. J Card Surg2021; 36: 4308–4319.
26.
GleasonTGSchindlerJTHagbergRC, et al. Subclavian/axillary access for self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement renders equivalent outcomes as transfemoral. Ann Thorac Surg2018; 105: 477–483.
27.
ReardonMJAdamsDHCoselliJS, et al. Self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement using alternative access sites in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis deemed extreme risk of surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2014; 148: 2869–2876.
