Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) frequently present with chronic kidney disease and are therefore particularly susceptible to nephrotoxic influences like iodinated contrast media. Acute kidney injury after TAVI is a severe complication that independently predicts short- and long-term mortality. The present study investigates the feasibility of a contrast-free approach by using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in conjunction with fluoroscopy.

Methods

Six domestic pigs (60 ± 5 kg) were anesthetized and underwent transapical implantation of a balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve. In the control group (n = 3), the procedures were guided by fluoroscopy/angiography. In the study group (n = 3), the procedures were guided by IVUS for preimplantation evaluation, intra-procedural guidance, and post-implantation evaluation, in conjunction with fluoroscopy without contrast. The procedures were evaluated by IVUS, fluoroscopy, aortic root angiography, and explantation and dissection of the hearts.

Results

Relevant anatomical landmarks for correct implantation were assessed by IVUS. The following annulus measurements were obtained: area (359.67 ± 29.58 mm²), perimeter (68.28 ± 2.63 mm), maximum diameter (22.20 ± 1.22 mm), minimum diameter (20.43 ± 1.12 mm), mean diameter (21.32 ± 0.70 mm), ellipticity index (1.09 ± 0.10), and area-derived diameter (21.39 ± 0.87 mm). IVUS-guided valve deployment resulted in correct expansion within the aortic annulus without signs of paravalvular leak, compromised mitral valve, or coronary obstruction. IVUS-guided post-implantation assessment confirmed circular expansion (25.88 ± 0.30 mm) of the valves.

Conclusions

IVUS-guided, contrast-free transapical TAVI is feasible in a porcine model.

Keywords

transcatheter aortic valve implantation intravascular ultrasound porcine model contrast media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baumgartner

Falk

Bax

. ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017; 2017: 2739–2791.

Leon

MB.

Smith

CR.

Mack

et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1597–1607.20961243

Smith

CR.

Leon

MB.

Mack

et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 2187–2198.21639811

Leon

MB.

Smith

CR.

Mack

et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 1609–1620.27040324

Reardon

MJ.

Van Mieghem

NM.

Popma

et al. Surgical or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 1321–1331.28304219

Mack

MJ.

Leon

MB.

Thourani

et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 1695–1705.30883058

Popma

JJ.

Deeb

GM.

Yakubov

et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 1706–1715.30883053

Durko

AP.

Osnabrugge

RL.

Van Mieghem

et al. Annual number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation per country: current estimates and future projections. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 2635–2642.29546396

Barbash

IM.

Ben-Dor

Dvir

et al. Incidence and predictors of acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J 2012; 163: 1031–1036.22709757

10.

Scherner

Wahlers

. Acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Thorac Dis 2015; 7: 1527–1535.26543598

11.

McCullough

PA.

Choi

JP.

Feghali

et al. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68: 1465–1473.27659469

12.

Bagur

Webb

JG.

Nietlispach

et al. Acute kidney injury following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: predictive factors, prognostic value, and comparison with surgical aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 865–874.20037180

13.

Nuis

R-J.

Rodés-Cabau

Sinning

J-M

et al. Blood transfusion and the risk of acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5: 680–688.23048055

14.

Gargiulo

Sannino

Capodanno

et al. Impact of postoperative acute kidney injury on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis of 5,971 patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 86: 518–527.25641565

15.

Kliuk-Ben Bassat

Finkelstein

Bazan

et al. Acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and mortality risk-long-term follow-up. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 35: 433–438.30169857

16.

Van Linden

Kempfert

Rastan

et al. Risk of acute kidney injury after minimally invasive transapical aortic valve implantation in 270 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 39: 835–843.21186126

17.

Yamamoto

Hayashida

Mouillet

et al. Renal function-based contrast dosing predicts acute kidney injury following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6: 479–486.23702012

18.

Giannini

Latib

Jabbour

et al. The ratio of contrast volume to glomerular filtration rate predicts acute kidney injury and mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2017; 18: 349–355.28342840

19.

Jochheim

Schneider

V-S.

Schwarz

et al. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury after computed tomography prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Radiol 2014; 69: 1034–1038.25017451

20.

Sauren

LD.

van Garsse

van Ommen

et al. Occupational radiation dose during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 78: 770–776.21523895

21.

Crowhurst

JA.

Scalia

GM.

Whitby

et al. Radiation exposure of operators performing transesophageal echocardiography during percutaneous structural cardiac interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71: 1246–1254.29544609

22.

Roguin

Goldstein

Bar

et al. Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol 2013; 111: 1368–1372.23419190

23.

Andreassi

MG.

Piccaluga

Guagliumi

et al. Occupational health risks in cardiac catheterization laboratory workers. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9: e003273.27072525

24.

von Segesser

LK.

Marty

Ruchat

et al. Routine use of intravascular ultrasound for endovascular aneurysm repair: angiography is not necessary. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002; 23: 537–542.12093071

25.

Tozzi

Marty

Ruchat

et al. Endovascular thoracic aortic aneurysm repair without angiography. Innovations 2009; 4: 32–35.22436901

26.

Hoshina

Kato

Miyahara

et al. A retrospective study of intravascular ultrasound use in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair: its usefulness and a description of the procedure. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40: 559–563.20739201

27.

Mariani

Guedes

Soares

et al. Intravascular ultrasound guidance to minimize the use of iodine contrast in percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7: 1287–1293.

28.

Wallace

GA.

Starnes

BW.

Hatsukami

et al. Intravascular ultrasound is a critical tool for accurate endograft sizing in the management of blunt thoracic aortic injury. J Vasc Surg 2015; 61: 630–635.25499713

29.

Zhang

Farooq

Garcia-Garcia

et al. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: a meta-analysis of one randomised trial and ten observational studies involving 19,619 patients. EuroIntervention 2012; 8: 855–865.23171805

30.

Mintz

GS.

Lefèvre

Lassen

et al. Intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation and treatment of left main coronary artery disease: a consensus statement from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 2018; 14: e467–e474.29688182

31.

Roy

DA.

Bhamra-Ariza

Asherson

et al. First-in-man use of aortic valve ultrasound for assessment of aortic valve anatomy pre- and post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6: 634–635.23787238

32.

Roy

Jahangiri

Sharma

et al. TCT-768 novel use of aortic valve IVUS to guide transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: B234.

33.

de Cillis

Dachille

Giardinelli

et al. Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound evaluation for the assessment of native valve measures in patients undergoing TAVI: preliminary results. Surg Technol Int 2016; 29: 201–206.27466865

34.

Giardinelli

Dachille

de Cillis

et al. Accuracy of IVUS evaluation for the assessment of native valve measures in patients undergoing TAVI: a single centre experience. In: PCR London Valves. London, United Kingdom, 24-26 September, 2017, paper no. Lond17A-OP069.

35.

Hakim

Ghimire

Alli

et al. Large-field intravascular ultrasound for annular sizing and predicting paravalvular regurgitation during TAVR: comparisons with multidetector computed tomography and transoesophageal echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 18: 1404–1413.28165129

36.

Crick

SJ.

Sheppard

MN.

et al. Anatomy of the pig heart: comparisons with normal human cardiac structure. J Anat 1998; 193(Pt 1): 105–119.9758141

37.

Essa

Makki

Bittenbender

et al. Vascular assessment for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: intravascular ultrasound compared with computed tomography. J Invasive Cardiol 2016; 28: E172–E178.27922808

38.

Leesar

MA.

Hakim

Sasse

et al. First-in-man large-field intravascular ultrasound-guided transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Struct Hear 2018; 2: 351–352.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.31 MB

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Contrast-Free Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Porcine Feasibility Study

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material