Optimizing Discharge After Shorter Hospitalizations: Lessons Learned Through After-Hours Calls with Thoracic Surgical Patients

Abstract

Objective

Minimally invasive procedures coupled with enhanced recovery pathways enable faster postoperative recovery and shorter hospitalizations. However, patients may experience unexpected concerns after return home, prompting after-hours calls. We aimed to characterize concerns prompting after-hours calls to improve discharge strategies.

Methods

A single-institution, retrospective review was conducted of thoracic surgical patients from 11/4/2019 to 6/14/2020. Records were reviewed and elements of patient demographics, surgical procedures, postoperative courses, reasons for calls, and outcome of calls were collected. We compared characteristics of patients who made after-hours calls to those who did not, and performed multivariable analysis to identify characteristics associated with making an after-hours call.

Results

During the study period, 379 patients underwent thoracic surgical procedures, among whom 88 (23.2%) initiated after-hours calls. Of these, 62 (70%) addressed patient symptoms, while 26 (30%) addressed patient questions including drain management, medications, and hospital policy questions. Patients making after-hours calls more frequently had undergone complex operations (26.1% vs 8.2%, P = 0.001), and were less likely to have received a standardized, clinician-initiated post-discharge telephone follow-up (29.5% vs 54.3%, P < 0.001). Complex operations increased likelihood of after-hours calls (OR: 3.33, 95% CI: 1.69-6.57, P < 0.001), while receipt of clinician-initiated telephone follow-up decreased likelihood of after-hours calls (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22-0.64, P < 0.001). There were no differences in emergency visits between the 2 groups (11% vs 8%, P = 0.370).

Conclusions

Despite efforts to optimize patient symptoms and knowledge prior to discharge, a substantial number of patients still have concerns after discharge. Many after-hours calls are related to knowledge gaps that may be addressed with improved predischarge education. Moreover, clinician-initiated telephone follow-up shows benefit in reducing after-hours calls.

Keywords

discharge planning telephone follow-up postoperative recovery thoracic surgery

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Nguyen

DM.

Sarkaria

IS.

Song

et al. Clinical and economic comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and open lobectomy. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12: 296–306.32274096

Nelson

DB.

Mehran

RJ.

Mitchell

et al. Robotic-assisted lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive institutional experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 108: 370–376.31004583

Xia

Liu

et al. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive surgery versus thoracotomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13: 252–261.33569205

Falcoz

P-E.

Puyraveau

Thomas

P-A

et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open lobectomy for primary non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of outcome from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeon database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 49: 602–609.25913824

Cao

Manganas

Ang

et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of propensity score-matched patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013; 16: 244–249.23169877

Van Haren

RM.

Mehran

RJ.

Mena

et al. Enhanced recovery decreases pulmonary and cardiac complications after thoracotomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 106: 272–279.29530770

Martin

LW.

Sarosiek

BM.

Harrison

et al. Implementing a thoracic enhanced recovery program: lessons learned in the first year. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105: 1597–1604.29510097

Sokouti

Aghdam

BA.

Golzari

SEJ

et al. A comparative study of postoperative pulmonary complications using fast track regimen and conservative analgesic treatment: a randomized clinical trial. Tanaffos 2011; 10: 12–19.25191370

Madani

Fiore

Jr. Wang

et al. An enhanced recovery pathway reduces duration of stay and complications after open pulmonary lobectomy. Surgery 2015; 158: 899–910.26189953

10.

Muehling

BM.

Halter

GL.

Schelzig

et al. Reduction of postoperative pulmonary complications after lung surgery using a fast track clinical pathway. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34: 174–180.18490173

11.

Lovasik

BP.

Blair

CM.

Little

et al. Reduction in post-discharge return to acute care in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: results of a quality improvement initiative. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 231: 231–238.32311466

12.

Takchi

Williams

GA.

Brauer

et al. Extending enhanced recovery after surgery protocols to the post-discharge setting: a phone call intervention to support patients after expedited discharge after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am Surg 2020; 86: 42–48.32077415

13.

Acher

AW.

Campbell-Flohr

SA.

Brenny-Fitzpatrick

et al. Improving patient-centered transitional care after complex abdominal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 225: 259–265.28549765

14.

Danielsen

SO.

Moons

Sandvik

et al. Impact of telephone follow-up and 24/7 hotline on 30-day readmission rates following aortic valve replacement -a randomized controlled trial. Int J Cardiol 2020; 300: 66–72.31387822

15.

Antonoff

MB.

Ragalie

Correa

et al. Results of postdischarge nursing telephone assessments: persistent symptoms common among pulmonary resection patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102: 276–281.27083250

16.

Van Haren

RM.

Correa

AM.

Sepesi

et al. Hospital readmissions after pulmonary resection: post-discharge nursing telephone assessment identifies high risk patients. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12: 184–190.32274083

17.

Sayin

Kanan

. Reasons for nursing telephone counseling from individuals discharged in the early postoperative period after breast surgery. Nurs Forum 2010; 45: 87–96.20536757

18.

Harrison

JD.

Auerbach

AD.

Quinn

et al. Assessing the impact of nurse post-discharge telephone calls on 30-day hospital readmission rates. J Gen Intern Med 2014; 29: 1519–1525.25103122

19.

Mistiaen

Poot

. Telephone follow-up, initiated by a hospital-based health professional, for postdischarge problems in patients discharged from hospital to home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 2006: CD004510.17054207

20.

Balaban

RB.

Weissman

JS.

Samuel

et al. Redefining and redesigning hospital discharge to enhance patient care: a randomized controlled study. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23: 1228–1233.18452048

21.

McMurry

TL.

Isbell

et al. Readmission after lung cancer resection is associated with a 6-fold increase in 90-day postoperative mortality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148: 2261–2267.24823283

22.

van der Meij

Bouwsma

EVA.

van den Heuvel

et al. Using e-health in perioperative care: a survey study investigating shortcomings in current perioperative care and possible future solutions. BMC Surg 2017; 17: 61.28535763

23.

Dudas

Bookwalter

Kerr

et al. The impact of follow-up telephone calls to patients after hospitalization. Dis Mon 2002; 48: 239–248.12021756

24.

Leconte

Beloeil

Dreano

et al. Post ambulatory discharge follow-up using automated text messaging. J Med Syst 2019; 43: 217.31172292

25.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . V-safe After Vaccination Health Checker, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vsafe.html (2021, accessed 06 June 2021).

26.

Vonk Noordegraaf

Anema

JR.

van Mechelen

et al. A personalised eHealth programme reduces the duration until return to work after gynaecological surgery: results of a multicentre randomised trial. BJOG 2014; 121: 1127–1136.24511914

27.

Bouwsma

EVA.

Huirne

JAF.

van de Ven

et al. Effectiveness of an internet-based perioperative care programme to enhance postoperative recovery in gynaecological patients: cluster controlled trial with randomised stepped-wedge implementation. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e017781.29382673

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.16 MB

0.18 MB

0.02 MB