CABG in Failing Hearts: A How-to-Guide to Using Modern Mechanical Support as Backup

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sheldon

WC.

Favaloro

RG.

Sones

FM Jr

et al. Reconstructive coronary artery surgery. Venous autograft technique. JAMA 1970; 213: 78–82.5467974

Veterans Administration Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Cooperative Study Group . Eleven-year survival in the Veterans Administration randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery for stable angina. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 1333–1339.6333636

Petrie

MC.

Jhund

PS.

She

et al. Ten-year outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting according to age in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: an analysis of the extended follow-up of the STICH Trial (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure). Circulation 2016; 134: 1314–1324.27573034

Hochman

JS.

Sleeper

LA.

Webb

et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 625–634.10460813

Norman

JC.

Igo

. Mechanical circulatory assistance: established (IABP) and evolving (LVAD). A narrative summary. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 33: 133–145.2411001

Shishehbor

MH.

Moazami

Tong

MZ-Y

et al. Cardiogenic shock: from ECMO to Impella and beyond. Cleve Clin J Med 2017; 84: 287–295.28388392

Thiele

Schuler

Neumann

F-J

et al. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: design and rationale of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial. Am Heart J 2012; 163: 938–945.22709745

Honore

PM.

Barreto Gutierrez

Kugener

et al. Risk of harlequin syndrome during bi-femoral peripheral VA-ECMO: should we pay more attention to the watershed or try to change the venous cannulation site? Crit Care 2020; 24: 450.32690070

Kawashima

Gojo

Nishimura

et al. Left ventricular mechanical support with Impella provides more ventricular unloading in heart failure than extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J 2011; 57: 169–176.21317769

10.

Tepper

Masood

MF.

Baltazar Garcia

et al. Left ventricular unloading by Impella device versus surgical vent during extracorporeal life support. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 104: 861–867.28347536

11.

Cowger

JA.

Naka

Aaronson

et al. Quality of life and functional capacity outcomes in the MOMENTUM 3 trial at 6 months: a call for new metrics for left ventricular assist device patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2018; 37: 15–24.29153637

12.

Molchanova-Cook

Chen

. Role of FDG-PET in evaluation of myocardial viability. PET Clin 2011; 6: 383–391.27156872

13.

Kim

RJ.

Rafael

et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1445–1453.11078769

14.

Braun

Bax

JJ.

Versteegh

MIM

et al. Preoperative left ventricular dimensions predict reverse remodeling following restrictive mitral annuloplasty in ischemic mitral regurgitation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 27: 847–853.15848325

15.

Morine

KJ.

Kiernan

MS.

Pham

et al. Pulmonary artery pulsatility index is associated with right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device surgery. J Card Fail 2016; 22: 110–116.26564619

16.

Korabathina

Heffernan

KS.

Paruchuri

et al. The pulmonary artery pulsatility index identifies severe right ventricular dysfunction in acute inferior myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 80: 593–600.21954053

17.

Ramzy

Soltesz

Anderson

. New surgical circulatory support system outcomes. ASAIO J 2020; 66: 746–752.32541335

18.

Anderson

Smith

Kane

et al. Impella 5.5 direct aortic implant and explant techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 111: e373–e375.33345787