As patients with cardiac disease live longer, reoperative mitral valve surgery has become more common. Although these operations are technically challenging and of high risk, outcomes continue to improve. Minimally invasive techniques, better cardioprotective strategies, and advanced perioperative care have contributed to this. In this review, we discuss surgical approaches, intraoperative strategies, novel catheter-directed devices, and clinical outcomes of contemporary reoperative mitral valve surgery.
CetinkayaA.PoggenpohlJ.BramlageKet al. Long-term outcome after mitral valve replacement using biological versus mechanical valves. J Cardiothorac Surg2019; 14: 120.doi:10.1186/s13019-019-0943-6http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31253187
2.
VohraHA.WhistanceRN.RoubelakisAet al. Outcome after redo-mitral valve replacement in adult patients: a 10-year single-centre experience. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2012; 14: 575–579.doi:10.1093/icvts/ivs005http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22294560
3.
ZegdiR.SleilatyG.LatrémouilleCet al. Reoperation for failure of mitral valve repair in degenerative disease: a single-center experience. Ann Thorac Surg2008; 86: 1480–1484.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.020http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19049735
RomanoMA.HaftJW.PaganiFDet al. Beating heart surgery via right thoracotomy for reoperative mitral valve surgery: a safe and effective operative alternative. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2012; 144: 334–339.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.09.026http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22050983
8.
PotterDD.Sundt, 3rdTM.ZehrKJet al. Risk of repeat mitral valve replacement for failed mitral valve prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg2004; 78: 67–72.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.01415223405
9.
BorgerMA.YauTM.RaoVet al. Reoperative mitral valve replacement: importance of preservation of the subvalvular apparatus. Ann Thorac Surg2002; 74: 1482–1487.doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03950-4http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12440596
10.
DavidTE.IvanovJ.ArmstrongSet al. A comparison of outcomes of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease with posterior, anterior, and bileaflet prolapse. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2005; 130: 1242–1249.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.06.046http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16256774
11.
CastilloJG.AnyanwuAC.FusterVet al. A near 100% repair rate for mitral valve prolapse is achievable in a reference center: implications for future guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2012; 144: 308–312.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.054http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22698565
12.
CooleyDA. Review of Carpentier's reconstructive valve surgery: from valve analysis to valve reconstruction. Tex Heart Inst J2010; 37: 382.
JamiesonWR.BurrLH.MiyagishimaRTet al. Actuarial versus actual freedom from structural valve deterioration with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. Can J Cardiol1999; 15: 973–978.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10504178
15.
AkinsCW. Results with mechanical cardiac valvular prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg1995; 60: 1836–1844.doi:10.1016/0003-4975(95)00766-0http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8787503
16.
AnyanwuAC.ItagakiS.VargheseRet al. Re-repair of the mitral valve as a primary strategy for early and late failures of mitral valve repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2014; 45: 352–358.doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezt256http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23864217
JaussaudN.GariboldiV.GrisoliDet al. Risk of reoperation for mitral bioprosthesis dysfunction. J Heart Valve Dis2012; 21: 56–60.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22474743
19.
EjioforJI.HirjiSA.Ramirez-Del ValFet al. Outcomes of repeat mitral valve replacement in patients with prior mitral surgery: a benchmark for transcatheter approaches. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2018; 156: 619–627.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.126http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29759741
20.
BarberoC.MarchettoG.RicciDet al. Right minithoracotomy for mitral valve surgery: impact of tailored strategies on early outcome. Ann Thorac Surg2016; 102: 1989–1994.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.104http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27435516
21.
MurziM.MiceliA.Di StefanoGet al. Minimally invasive right thoracotomy approach for mitral valve surgery in patients with previous sternotomy: a single institution experience with 173 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2014; 148: 2763–2768.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.108http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25224550
22.
RamchandaniM.Al JabbariO.Abu SalehWKet al. Cannulation strategies and pitfalls in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J2016; 12: 10–13.doi:10.14797/mdcj-12-1-10http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27127556
23.
SvenssonLG.BlackstoneEH.RajeswaranJet al. Does the arterial cannulation site for circulatory arrest influence stroke risk?Ann Thorac Surg2004; 78: 1274–1284.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.063http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15464485
24.
SchwartzDS.RibakoveGH.GrossiEAet al. Minimally invasive cardiopulmonary bypass with cardioplegic arrest: a closed chest technique with equivalent myocardial protection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1996; 111: 556–566.doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70307-0http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8601970
25.
GlowerDD.DesaiB. Transaortic endoclamp for mitral valve operation through right minithoracotomy in 369 patients. Innovations2010; 5: 394–399.doi:10.1177/155698451000500603http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22437633
26.
Van NootenG.Van BelleghemY.Van OverbekeHet al. Redo mitral surgery using the Estech endoclamp. Heart Surg Forum2001; 4: 31–33.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11502494
27.
OnnaschJF.SchneiderF.FalkVet al. Minimally invasive approach for redo mitral valve surgery: a true benefit for the patient. J Card Surg2002; 17: 14–19.doi:10.1111/j.1540-8191.2001.tb01214.xhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12027121
28.
MaselliD.PizioR.BorelliGet al. Endovascular balloon versus transthoracic aortic clamping for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: impact on cerebral microemboli. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2006; 5: 183–186.doi:10.1510/icvts.2005.123372http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17670543
29.
LuoH.QiX.ShiHet al. Single-dose del Nido cardioplegia used in adult minimally invasive valve surgery. J Thorac Dis2019; 11: 2373–2382.doi:10.21037/jtd.2019.05.78
30.
HummelBW.BussRW.DiGiorgiPLet al. Myocardial protection and financial considerations of custodiol cardioplegia in minimally invasive and open valve surgery. Innovations2016; 11: 420–424.doi:10.1097/imi.0000000000000314http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27879532
31.
MojenaGC.TaínJ.ParedesAMet al. A comparison of beating heart and arrested heart techniques for mitral valve replacement surgery. MEDICC Rev2009; 11: 36–41.21483325
32.
KitamuraT.StuklisRG.EdwardsJ. Redo mitral valve operation via right minithoracotomy-"no touch" technique. Int Heart J2011; 52: 107–109.doi:10.1536/ihj.52.107http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21483170
33.
AdN.HolmesSD.ShumanDJet al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping and with femoral cannulation is not associated with increased risk of stroke compared with traditional mitral valve surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2015; 48: 868–872.doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezv017http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25646401
34.
DubostC.GuilmetD.de ParadesBet al. New technic of opening of the left auricle in open-heart surgery: the transseptal bi-auricular approach. Presse Med1966; 74: 1607–1608.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5932446
35.
BrawleyRK. Improved exposure of the mitral valve in patients with a small left atrium. Ann Thorac Surg1980; 29: 179–181.doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(10)61660-8http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7356370
36.
GuiraudonGM.OfieshJG.KaushikR. Extended vertical transatrial septal approach to the mitral valve. Ann Thorac Surg1991; 52: 1058–1062.doi:10.1016/0003-4975(91)91281-Yhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1953124
37.
KimGS.BeomMS.KimSRet al. Modified surgical intervention for extensive mitral valve endocarditis and posterior mitral annular calcification. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2016; 49: 46–49.doi:10.5090/kjtcs.2016.49.1.46http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26889447
38.
BedeirK.KanekoT.ArankiS. Current and evolving strategies in the management of severe mitral annular calcification. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2019; 157: 555–566.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.05.099http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385026
39.
DavidTE.FeindelCM.ArmstrongSet al. Reconstruction of the mitral anulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1995; 110: 1323–1332.doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70055-2
40.
NishidaH.FukuiT.KasegawaHet al. Causes of repair failure for degenerative mitral valve disease and reoperation outcomes. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2018; 53: 1244–1250.doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezx468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29309559
41.
AphramG.De KerchoveL.MastrobuoniSet al. Re-repair of the failed mitral valve: insights into aetiology and surgical management. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2018; 54: 774–780.doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezy111http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29547941
42.
GillinovAM.CosgroveDM.LytleBWet al. Reoperation for failure of mitral valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1997; 113: 467–475.doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70359-3http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9081091
KilicA.HelmersMR.HanJJet al. Redo mitral valve surgery following prior mitral valve repair. J Card Surg2018; 33: 772–777.doi:10.1111/jocs.13944http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30548701
45.
SuriRM.SchaffHV.DearaniJAet al. Recurrent mitral regurgitation after repair: should the mitral valve be re-repaired?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2006; 132: 1390–1397.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.018http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17140963
46.
SeeburgerJ.BorgerMA.FalkVet al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery after previous sternotomy: experience in 181 patients. Ann Thorac Surg2009; 87: 709–714.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.11.053http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19231375
47.
AkayTH.GultekinB.OzkanSet al. Mitral valve replacements in redo patients with previous mitral valve procedures: mid-term results and risk factors for survival. J Card Surg2008; 23: 415–421.doi:10.1111/j.1540-8191.2008.00630.xhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18928480
48.
KothariJ.PatelK.BrahmbhattBet al. Redo mitral valve replacement for prosthetic valve thrombosis: single center experience. J Clin Diagn Res2016; 10: PC01–PC03.doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/20209.8913http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28050429
49.
MatsuyamaK.MatsumotoM.SugitaTet al. Long-term results of reoperative mitral valve surgery in patients with rheumatic disease. Ann Thorac Surg2003; 76: 1939–1943.doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01061-0http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14667617
50.
SuzukiY.PaganiFD.BollingSF. Left thoracotomy for multiple-time redo mitral valve surgery using on-pump beating heart technique. Ann Thorac Surg2008; 86: 466–471.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.050http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18640318
51.
Castillo-SangM.GuthrieTJ.MoonMRet al. Outcomes of repeat mitral valve surgery in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Innovations2015; 10: 120–124.doi:10.1097/imi.0000000000000139http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25803772
52.
MeyerSR.SzetoWY.AugoustidesJGet al. Reoperative mitral valve surgery by the port access minithoracotomy approach is safe and effective. Ann Thorac Surg2009; 87: 1426–1430.
53.
TrehanN.MishraYK.MathewSGet al. Redo mitral valve surgery using the port-access system. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann2002; 10: 215–218.doi:10.1177/021849230201000305http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12213742
54.
OnoratiF.GattiG.PerrottiAet al. Impact of failed mitral valve repair on hospital outcome of redo mitral valve procedures. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2017; 51: 906–912.doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezw436http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28204140
55.
LagercrantzE.LindblomD.SartipyU. Survival and quality of life in cardiac surgery patients with prolonged intensive care. Ann Thorac Surg2010; 89: 490–495.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.09.073http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20103328
56.
WaltherT.FalkV.MetzSet al. Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg1999; 67: 1643–1647.doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00284-2http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10391268
57.
KaraKA.CanerT. Comparison of pain in the early post-operative period using VAS score in patients after cardiac surgery who had minimally invasive incisions vs. full median sternotomy. Ann Ital Chir2019; 90: 3–9.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30394365
58.
Al OtaibiA.GuptaS.Belley-CoteEPet al. Mini-thoracotomy vs. conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Surg2017; 58: 489–496.doi:10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09603-8http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27588617
59.
CaoC.GuptaS.ChandrakumarDet al. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional mitral valve repair for patients with degenerative mitral disease. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2013; 2: 693–703.
60.
SvenssonLG.AtikFA.CosgroveDMet al. Minimally invasive versus conventional mitral valve surgery: a propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2010; 139: 926–932.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.038http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19945121
61.
SpezialeG.NassoG.EspositoGet al. Results of mitral valve repair for Barlow disease (bileaflet prolapse) via right minithoracotomy versus conventional median sternotomy: a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2011; 142: 77–83.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.033http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20926105
BalsamLB.GrossiEA.GreenhouseDGet al. Reoperative valve surgery in the elderly: predictors of risk and long-term survival. Ann Thorac Surg2010; 90: 1195–1201.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.057http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20868814
64.
SorajjaP.VemulapalliS.FeldmanTet al. Outcomes with transcatheter mitral valve repair in the United States: an STS/ACC TVT Registry report. J Am Coll Cardiol2017; 70: 2315–2327.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.015http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29096801
65.
Del ValD.Ferreira-NetoAN.Wintzer-WehekindJet al. Early experience with transcatheter mitral valve replacement: a systematic review. J Am Heart Assoc2019; 8: e013332.doi:10.1161/JAHA.119.013332http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31441371
66.
YoonS-H.WhisenantBK.BleizifferSet al. Outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses, failed annuloplasty rings, and mitral annular calcification. Eur Heart J2019; 40: 441–451.doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy590http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30357365
67.
GuerreroM.VemulapalliS.XiangQet al. Thirty-day outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated mitral bioprostheses (valve-in-valve), failed surgical rings (valve-in-ring), and native valve with severe mitral annular calcification (valve-in-mitral annular calcification) in the United States: data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology/Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv2020; 13: e008425.doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008425http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32138529
SondergaardL.BrooksM.IhlemannNet al. Transcatheter mitral valve implantation via transapical approach: an early experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2015; 48: 873–878.doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezu546http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25653251
70.
CheungA. Early experience of TIARA transcatheter mitral valve replacement system. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2018; 7: 787–791.doi:10.21037/acs.2018.09.05http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30598894
71.
SorajjaP.MoatN.BadhwarVet al. Initial feasibility study of a new transcatheter mitral prosthesis: the first 100 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol2019; 73: 1250–1260.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.066http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30898200
72.
BapatV.RajagopalV.MeduriCet al. Early experience with new transcatheter mitral valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol2018; 71: 12–21.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.061
73.
WebbJG.MurdochDJ.BooneRHet al. Percutaneous transcatheter mitral valve replacement: first-in-human experience with a new transseptal system. J Am Coll Cardiol2019; 73: 1239–1246.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.065http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30898198
74.
Munkholm-LarsenS.WanB.TianDHet al. A systematic review on the safety and efficacy of percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system for high surgical risk candidates. Heart2014; 100: 473–478.doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304049http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23813844
75.
MahabirCA.DeFilippisEM.AggarwalSet al. The first 4 years of postmarketing safety surveillance related to the MitraClip device: a United States Food and Drug Administration MAUDE experience. J Invasive Cardiol2020; 32: E130–E132.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269176
76.
OrbanM.LüsebrinkE.BraunDet al. Recent advances in patient selection and devices for transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in heart failure. Expert Rev Med Devices2020; 17: 93–102.doi:10.1080/17434440.2020.1714433http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31923376
77.
SorajjaP.MackM.VemulapalliSet al. Initial experience with commercial transcatheter mitral valve repair in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol2016; 67: 1129–1140.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.054
78.
WhitlowPL.FeldmanT.PedersenWRet al. Acute and 12-month results with catheter-based mitral valve leaflet repair: the EVEREST II (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair) High Risk Study. J Am Coll Cardiol2012; 59: 130–139.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.067http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22222076
79.
StoneGW.LindenfeldJ.AbrahamWTet al. Transcatheter mitral-valve repair in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med2018; 379: 2307–2318.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1806640http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30280640
80.
ObadiaJ-F.Messika-ZeitounD.LeurentGet al. Percutaneous repair or medical treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med2018; 379: 2297–2306.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1805374http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30145927
81.
TabataN.WeberM.SinningJ-Met al. Successful edge-to-edge mitral repair using the new MitraClip XTR System following rupture of transapical implanted NeoChord. JACC Cardiovasc Interv2018; 11: e175–e177.doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2018.08.030http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30343017
82.
TabataN.SugiuraA.TsujitaKet al. Percutaneous interventions for mitral and tricuspid heart valve diseases. Cardiovasc Interv Ther2020; 35: 62–71.doi:10.1007/s12928-019-00610-zhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31396890
83.
KriechbaumSD.BoederNF.GaedeLet al. Mitral valve leaflet repair with the new PASCAL system: early real-world data from a German multicentre experience. Clin Res Cardiol2020; 109: 549–559.doi:10.1007/s00392-019-01538-3http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31451915
84.
PrazF.SpargiasK.ChrissoherisMet al. Compassionate use of the PASCAL transcatheter mitral valve repair system for patients with severe mitral regurgitation: a multicentre, prospective, observational, first-in-man study. Lancet2017; 390: 773–780.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31600-8http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28831993
85.
MaisanoF.TaramassoM.NickenigGet al. Cardioband, a transcatheter surgical-like direct mitral valve annuloplasty system: early results of the feasibility trial. Eur Heart J2016; 37: 817–825.doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv603http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26586779
86.
NickenigG.HammerstinglC.SchuelerRet al. Transcatheter mitral annuloplasty in chronic functional mitral regurgitation: 6-month results with the Cardioband percutaneous mitral repair system. JACC Cardiovasc Interv2016; 9: 2039–2047.doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.005http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27712741
87.
TaramassoM.AlessandriniH.LatibAet al. Outcomes after current transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention: mid-term results from the International TriValve Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv2019; 12: 155–165.doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.022http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30594510
88.
MaisanoF.TaramassoM. The Cardioband transcatheter direct mitral valve annuloplasty system. EuroIntervention2015; 11: W58–W59.doi:10.4244/EIJV11SWA15http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26384192
89.
MillerM.ThouraniVH.WhisenantB. The Cardioband transcatheter annular reduction system. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2018; 7: 741–747.doi:10.21037/acs.2018.10.10http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30598887
90.
WeberM.ÖztürkC.TaramassoMet al. Leaflet edge-to-edge treatment versus direct annuloplasty in patients with functional mitral regurgitation. Euro Intervention2019; 15: 912–918.doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31113764
91.
NickenigG.SchuelerR.DagerAet al. Treatment of chronic functional mitral valve regurgitation with a percutaneous annuloplasty system. J Am Coll Cardiol2016; 67: 2927–2936.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.591http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27339489
92.
SchoferJ.SiminiakT.HaudeMet al. Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty for functional mitral regurgitation: results of the CARILLON Mitral Annuloplasty Device European Union Study. Circulation2009; 120: 326–333.doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.849885http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19597051
93.
SiminiakT.WuJC.HaudeMet al. Treatment of functional mitral regurgitation by percutaneous annuloplasty: results of the TITAN Trial. Eur J Heart Fail2012; 14: 931–938.doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfs076http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22613584
94.
LipieckiJ.SiminiakT.SievertHet al. Coronary sinus-based percutaneous annuloplasty as treatment for functional mitral regurgitation: the TITAN II trial. Open Heart2016; 3: e000411.doi:10.1136/openhrt-2016-00041127493761
95.
GoldbergSL.MeredithI.MarwickTet al. A randomized double-blind trial of an interventional device treatment of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with symptomatic congestive heart failure-trial design of the REDUCE FMR study. Am Heart J2017; 188: 167–174.doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2017.02.032http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28577672
96.
RucinskasK.JanusauskasV.ZakarkaiteDet al. Off-pump transapical implantation of artificial chordae to correct mitral regurgitation: early results of a single-center experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2014; 147: 95–99.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.012http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24100100
97.
SeeburgerJ.RinaldiM.NielsenSLet al. Off-pump transapical implantation of artificial neo-chordae to correct mitral regurgitation: the TACT Trial (Transapical Artificial Chordae Tendinae) proof of concept. J Am Coll Cardiol2014; 63: 914–919.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.090http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24076529
98.
ColliA.BizzottoE.ManzanEet al. Patient-specific ventricular access site selection for the NeoChord mitral valve repair procedure. Ann Thorac Surg2017; 104: e199–e202.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.03.082http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28734454
ColliA.ManzanE.AidietisAet al. An early European experience with transapical off-pump mitral valve repair with NeoChord implantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2018; 54: 460–466.doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezy064http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29514183
102.
GammieJS.WilsonP.BartusKet al. Transapical beating-heart mitral valve repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene cordal implantation device: initial clinical experience. Circulation2016; 134: 189–197.doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022010http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27436878
103.
GerosaG.D'OnofrioA.BesolaLet al. Transoesophageal echo-guided mitral valve repair using the Harpoon system. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2018; 53: 871–873.doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezx365http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29092010
104.
GammieJS.BartusK.GackowskiAet al. Beating-heart mitral valve repair using a novel ePTFE cordal implantation device: a Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol2018; 71: 25–36.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.062http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29102688
105.
WeberA.RucinskasK.JanusauskasVet al. Automated implantation of artificial mitral chords: preliminary results from the feasibility trial. Ann Thorac Surg2020; 109: 597–602.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.08.037http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31563490
106.
CheungA.WebbJG.BarbantiMet al. 5-year experience with transcatheter transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol2013; 61: 1759–1766.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.05823500301
107.
YeJ.CheungA.YamashitaMet al. Transcatheter aortic and mitral valve-in-valve implantation for failed surgical bioprosthetic valves: an 8-year single-center experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv2015; 8: 1735–1744.doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.012http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26476608
108.
RanneyDN.WilliamsJB.WangAet al. Valve-in-valve transcatheter valve implantation in the nonaortic position. J Card Surg2016; 31: 282–288.doi:10.1111/jocs.12745http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27059552
109.
BouletiC.FassaA-A.HimbertDet al. Transfemoral implantation of transcatheter heart valves after deterioration of mitral bioprosthesis or previous ring annuloplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv2015; 8: 83–91.doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2014.07.02625616821
110.
HuJ.ChenY.ChengSet al. Transcatheter mitral valve implantation for degenerated mitral bioprostheses or failed surgical annuloplasty rings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg2018; 33: 508–519.doi:10.1111/jocs.13767http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29989214
111.
LloydJW.JosephTA.CabalkaAKet al. Hemodynamic and clinical response to transseptal mitral valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv2019; 94: 458–466.doi:10.1002/ccd.28149http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30790436
112.
KeenanNM.BennettsJS.McGaviganADet al. Transcatheter transseptal mitral valve-in-valve replacement: an early Australian case series and literature review. Heart Lung Circ2020; 29: 921–930.doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2019.07.010http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31526680
113.
da CostaLPN.PalmaJH.Barbosa RibeiroHet al. Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation: reports of the first 50 cases from a Latin American centre. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2020; 30: 229–235.doi:10.1093/icvts/ivz265http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31713609
114.
LipinskiJ.PatelSM.PatelTRet al. Transcatheter valve implantation for failed surgical aortic and mitral bioprostheses: a single-center experience. J Invasive Cardiol2020; 32: 186–193.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32160153
115.
FlynnCD.Wilson-SmithAR.YanTD. Novel mitral valve technologies-transcatheter mitral valve implantation: a systematic review. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2018; 7: 716–723.doi:10.21037/acs.2018.11.01http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30598884
116.
UrenaM.BrochetE.LecomteMet al. Clinical and haemodynamic outcomes of balloon-expandable transcatheter mitral valve implantation: a 7-year experience. Eur Heart J2018; 39: 2679–2689.doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy271http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29788044
117.
WernerN.KilkowskiC.SutorDet al. Transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) using Edwards SAPIEN 3 prostheses in patients at very high or prohibitive surgical risk: a single-center experience. J Interv Cardiol2020; 2020: 1–11.doi:10.1155/2020/9485247http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31992963
118.
ElmouslyA.WorkuB.GrayKDet al. Mitral valve-in-valve implantation as an elective or rescue procedure in high-risk patients. Ann Thorac Surg2018; 105: 1778–1783.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.12.036http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29382511
119.
YamashitaK.FukushimaS.ShimaharaYet al. Early outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthesis in Japanese (MITRAL VIV study): a four-case series. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2020; 68: 1–8.doi:10.1007/s11748-019-01147-xhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31129791
120.
OkohAK.ShahA.KangNet al. Outcomes after transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement in patients with degenerated bioprosthesis: a single-center experience. J Invasive Cardiol2020; 32: 49–54.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31724535
121.
LongA.MahoneyP. Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring replacement in high-risk surgical patients: feasibility, safety, and longitudinal outcomes in a single-center experience. J Invasive Cardiol2018; 30: 324–328.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29906265
122.
KamiokaN.BabaliarosV.MorseMAet al. Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after surgical redo mitral valve replacement and transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv2018; 11: 1131–1138.doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929633
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
