NishimuraRA.OttoCM.BonowROet al. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol2017; 70: 252–289.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28315732
2.
IribarneA.EasterwoodR.RussoMJet al. A minimally invasive approach is more cost-effective than a traditional sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2011; 142: 1507–1514.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.038http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21665228
3.
NissenAP.MillerCC.ThouraniVHet al. Less invasive mitral surgery versus conventional sternotomy stratified by mitral pathology. Ann Thorac Surg. Epub ahead of print 24 Jul 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.145.
32717233
4.
BollingSF.LiS.O’BrienSMet al. Predictors of mitral valve repair: clinical and surgeon factors. Ann Thorac Surg2010; 90: 1904–1912.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.07.062
5.
LaParDJ.AilawadiG.IsbellJMet al. Mitral valve repair rates correlate with surgeon and institutional experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2014; 148: 995–1004.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.039http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25048633
6.
BadhwarV.VemulapalliS.MackMAet al. Volume-outcome association of mitral valve surgery in the United States. JAMA Cardiol. Epub ahead of print 1 Jul 2020. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2221.
32609292
7.
ChikweJ.ToyodaN.AnyanwuACet al. Relation of mitral valve surgery volume to repair rate, durability, and survival. J Am Coll Cardiol2017; 69: 2397–2406.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.02628476349
VoAT.NguyenDH.Van HoangSet al. Learning curve in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a single-center experience. J Cardiothorac Surg2019; 14: 213.doi:10.1186/s13019-019-1038-0http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31806039
10.
GammieJS.ChikweJ.BadhwarVet al. Isolated mitral valve surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database analysis. Ann Thorac Surg2018; 106: 716–727.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.03.08630032907
DominguezEP.BarratC.ShafferLet al. Minimally invasive surgery adoption into an established surgical practice: impact of a fellowship-trained colleague. Surg Endosc2013; 27: 1267–1272.doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2594-8http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23232996
13.
ChoyI.KittoS.Adu-AryeeNet al. Barriers to the uptake of laparoscopic surgery in a lower-middle-income country. Surg Endosc2013; 27: 4009–4015.doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3019-zhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23708726
14.
CooperMA.HutflessS.SegevDLet al. Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review. BMJ2014; 349: g4198.doi:10.1136/bmj.g4198http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25005264
15.
BraithwaiteJ.HerkesJ.LudlowKet al. Association between organisational and workplace cultures, and patient outcomes: systematic review. BMJ Open2017; 7: e017708.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017708http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29122796
16.
BonowRO.AdamsDH. The time has come to define centers of excellence in mitral valve repair. J Am Coll Cardiol2016; 67: 499–501.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.007http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26846947
17.
VoAT.LeKM.NguyenTTet al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery for rheumatic valve disease. Heart Surg Forum2019; 22: E390–E395.doi:10.1532/hsf.2529http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31596718
18.
VemulapalliS.Grau-SepulvedaM.HabibRet al. Patient and hospital characteristics of mitral valve surgery in the United States. JAMA Cardiol2019; 4: 1149–1155.doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3659http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31577335
19.
SuriRM.ClavelM-A.SchaffHVet al. Effect of recurrent mitral regurgitation following degenerative mitral valve repair: long-term analysis of competing outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol2016; 67: 488–498.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.098http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26846946
20.
McCarthyPM. When is your surgeon good enough? When do you need a “referent surgeon”?Curr Cardiol Rep2009; 11: 107–113.doi:10.1007/s11886-009-0017-9http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19236826
21.
AdamsDH.AnyanwuAC. Seeking a higher standard for degenerative mitral valve repair: begin with etiology. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2008; 136: 551–556.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.060
22.
HolzheyDM.SeeburgerJ.MisfeldMet al. Learning minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a cumulative sum sequential probability analysis of 3895 operations from a single high-volume center. Circulation2013; 128: 483–491.doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001402http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23804253
23.
ChhatriwallaAK.VemulapalliS.SzerlipMet al. Operator experience and outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve repair in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol2019; 74: 2955–2965.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.01431568867
NissenAP.NguyenS.AbreuJet al. The first 5 years: building a minimally invasive valve program. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2019; 157: 1958–1965.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.03730470541
26.
WangH.BoydJH. How to start a successful robotic mitral surgery program: it’s not just about the surgery!J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2018; 155: 1472–1473.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.12.017
LehrEJ.GuyTS.SmithRLet al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery III: training and robotic-assisted approaches. Innovations2016; 11: 260–267.doi:10.1097/imi.0000000000000299
29.
YaffeeDW.LoulmetDF.KellyLAet al. Can the learning curve of totally endoscopic robotic mitral valve repair be short-circuited?Innovations2014; 9: 43–48.doi:10.1097/imi.0000000000000039
30.
EdelmanJJ.ThouraniVH. Commentary: how (and why) to make it mini. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2019; 157: 1968–1969.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.083http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30454979
31.
El-EshmawiA.CastilloJG.TangGHLet al. Developing a mitral valve center of excellence. Curr Opin Cardiol2018; 33: 155–161.doi:10.1097/HCO.0000000000000498http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29329115