Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

Robotic off-pump totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) usually requires isolated single (right) lung ventilation to adequately expose the surgical site. However, in some patients, persistent oxygen desaturation may occur and conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) or sternotomy may be necessary. We reviewed the characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients who did not tolerate single-lung ventilation during TECAB surgery.

Methods

After Institutional Review Board approval we reviewed 440 patients undergoing robotic TECAB at our institution between July 2013 and April 2019. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on their ability to tolerate single-lung ventilation during the procedure. Group 1 included patients able to tolerate single-lung ventilation and Group 2 were patients who required double-lung ventilation to tolerate the procedure. Early and mid-term outcomes were compared.

Results

Group 2 (121 patients) had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores, higher body mass index, and more triple-vessel disease than Group 1 (319 patients). Group 2 had more bilateral internal mammary artery use, multivessel grafting, and longer operative times. One patient underwent conversion to sternotomy and 5 required CPB (all in Group 1). Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were longer in Group 2. Observed/expected mortality did not differ between groups (1.06% in Group 2 vs 0.4% in Group 1; P = 0.215). At mid-term follow-up, cardiac-related/overall mortality and freedom from major adverse cardiac events were similar.

Conclusions

In our cohort, intolerance of single-lung ventilation did not preclude robotic off-pump TECAB. Double-lung ventilation is feasible during the procedure and may prevent conversions to sternotomy or use of CPB, resulting in excellent early and mid-term outcomes.

Keywords

robotic surgery coronary artery bypass anesthetic management TECAB minimally invasive cardiac surgery

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Loulmet

Carpentier

d’Attellis

et al. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 118: 4–10.doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70133-9

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10384177

Bonaros

Schachner

Lehr

et al. Five hundred cases of robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: predictors of success and safety. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95: 803–812.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.09.071

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23312792

Bonatti

Lee

JD.

Bonaros

et al. Robotic totally endoscopic multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: procedure development, challenges, results. Innovations 2012; 7: 3–8.doi:10.1097/imi.0b013e3182552ea8

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22576029

Leonard

JR.

Rahouma

Abouarab

et al. Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of the current evidence. Int J Cardiol 2018; 261: 42–46.doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.071

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29657055

Ender

Bury

AM.

Raumanns

et al. The use of a bronchial blocker compared with a double-lumen tube for single-lung ventilation during minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002; 16: 452–455.doi:10.1053/jcan.2002.125144

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12154424

Deshpande

SP.

Lehr

Odonkor

et al. Anesthetic management of robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery (TECAB). J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013; 27: 586–599.doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2013.01.005

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23672862

Bhatt

HV.

Schuessler

ME.

Torregrossa

et al. Robotic cardiac surgery Part II: anesthetic considerations for robotic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34: 2484–2491.doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2019.11.005

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31812565

Balkhy

HH.

Wann

LS.

Krienbring

et al. Integrating coronary anastomotic connectors and robotics toward a totally endoscopic beating heart approach: review of 120 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92: 821–827.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.04.103

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21871264

Balkhy

HH.

Nisivaco

Kitahara

et al. Robotic multivessel endoscopic coronary bypass: impact of a beating-heart approach with connectors. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 108: 67–73.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.12.044

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30690021

10.

Schachner

Bonaros

Wiedemann

et al. Predictors, causes, and consequences of conversions in robotically enhanced totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91: 647–653.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.10.072

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21352972

11.

Wiedemann

Bonaros

Schachner

et al. Single-lung ventilation time does not increase lung injury after totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Surg Forum 2010; 13: E383–E390.doi:10.1532/HSF98.20101122

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21169149

12.

Schachner

Bonaros

Wiedemann

et al. Training surgeons to perform robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 523–527.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.089

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19632405

13.

Fudulu

Benedetto

Pecchinenda

et al. Current outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: evidence from randomized controlled trials. J Thorac Dis 2016; 8(Suppl 10): S758–S771. doi:10.21037/jtd.2016.10.80

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27942394

14.

Kowalewski

Pawliszak

Malvindi

et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes in high-risk patients compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 151: 60–77.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.042

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26433633

15.

Wan

IYP.

Arifi

AA.

Wan

et al. Beating heart revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass: evaluation of inflammatory response in a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 1624–1631.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.10.043

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15173716

16.

Wiedemann

Schachner

Bonaros

et al. Does obesity affect operative times and perioperative outcome of patients undergoing totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009; 9: 214–217.doi:10.1510/icvts.2009.203059

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19454414

17.

Balkhy

HH.

Nisivaco

Kitahara

et al. Robotic beating heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass in higher-risk patients: can it be done safely? Innovations 2018; 13: 108–113.doi:10.1097/imi.0000000000000481

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29688940

18.

Kitahara

Patel

McCrorey

et al. Is robotic beating heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass feasible for BMI > 35 morbidly obese patients? Int J Med Robot 2018; 14: e1911.doi:10.1002/rcs.1911

29687573

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.14 MB

0.00 MB

Does Intolerance of Single-Lung Ventilation Preclude Robotic Off-Pump Totally Endoscopic Coronary Bypass Surgery?

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material