Robotic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The Whole 9 Yards

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ElBardissi

AW.

Aranki

SF.

Sheng

et al. Trends in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 143: 273–281.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.029

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22248680

Une

Sakaguchi

. Initiation and modification of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 67: 349–354.doi:10.1007/s11748-018-1050-7

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30569257

Doulamis

IP.

Spartalis

Machairas

et al. The role of robotics in cardiac surgery: a systematic review. J Robot Surg 2019; 13: 41–52.doi:10.1007/s11701-018-0875-5

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30255360

Leyvi

Forest

SJ.

Srinivas

et al. Robotic coronary artery bypass grafting decreases 30-day complication rate, length of stay, and acute care facility discharge rate compared with conventional surgery. Innovations 2014; 9: 361–367.doi:10.1097/imi.0000000000000095

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25238421

Cao

Indraratna

Doyle

et al. A systematic review on robotic coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 5: 530–543.doi:10.21037/acs.2016.11.08

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27942485

Kitahara

Hirai

McCrorey

et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization: midterm outcomes of robotic multivessel bypass and percutaneous interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 157: 1829–1836.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.08.126

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30635190

Kitahara

Wehman

Balkhy

. Can robotic-assisted surgery overcome the risk of mortality in cardiac reoperation? Innovations 2018; 13: 438–444.doi:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000567

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30547897

Mirzai

Patel

Balkhy

. Robotic totally endoscopic off-pump unroofing of left anterior descending coronary artery myocardial bridge: a report of two cases. J Card Surg 2019; 34: 735–737.doi:10.1111/jocs.14094

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31212378

Falk

Loulmet

Wolf

. Procedural guide. Robotically assisted IMA harvest. Mountain View, CA: da Vinci Intuitive Surgical 2001.

10.

Balkhy

HH.

Kitahara

Mitzman

et al. Robotic totally endoscopic beating-heart bypass to the right coronary artery: first worldwide experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 57: 529–534.doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezz283

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31638696

11.

Balkhy

HH.

Nathan

Arnsdorf

et al. Right internal mammary artery use in 140 robotic totally endoscopic coronary bypass cases: toward multiarterial grafting. Innovations 2017; 12: 9–14.doi:10.1097/imi.0000000000000341

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28106618

12.

Lehr

EJ.

Bonatti

. Totally endoscopic coronary bypass surgery robotic on pump (TECAB). In: Chitwood

WR.

(ed) Atlas of Robotic Cardiac Surgery. London: Springer, 2014, pp. 79–86.

13.

Hashimoto

Ota

Balkhy

. Robotic off-pump totally endoscopic hand-sewn coronary artery bypass using in-situ bilateral internal mammary artery. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg 2020. Epub ahead of print 2 Jan 2020. DOI: 10.1510/mmcts.2020.001. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31990160

14.

Matschke

KE.

Gummert

JF.

Demertzis

et al. The Cardica C-Port System: clinical and angiographic evaluation of a new device for automated, compliant distal anastomoses in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery--a multicenter prospective clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 130: 1645–1652.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.08.033

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16308011

15.

Nishida

Watanabe

Ishikawa

et al. Beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: report of a case. Surg Today 2010; 40: 57–59.doi:10.1007/s00595-009-4004-y

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20037841

16.

de Cannière

Wimmer-Greinecker

Cichon

et al. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: multicenter European experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134: 710–716.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.06.057

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17723822

17.

Yang

Wang

et al. Robotic total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: seven-year single-center experience and long-term follow-up of graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100: 1367–1373.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.054

26190391

18.

Halkos

ME.

Liberman

HA.

Devireddy

et al. Early clinical and angiographic outcomes after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147: 179–185.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.010

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24172691

19.

Kiaii

McClure

RS.

Stitt

et al. Prospective angiographic comparison of direct, endoscopic, and telesurgical approaches to harvesting the internal thoracic artery. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 624–628.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.013

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16863775

20.

Giambruno

Chu

MW.

Fox

et al. Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery: an 18-year single-centre experience. Int J Med Robot 2018; 14: e1891 doi:10.1002/rcs.1891

29349908

21.

Christidis

NK.

Fox

SA.

Swinamer

et al. Reason and timing for conversion to sternotomy in robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting and patient outcomes. Innovations 2018; 13: 423–427.doi:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000566

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30540591

22.

Tarola

CL.

Al-Amodi

HA.

Balasubramanian

et al. Ultrafast track robotic-assisted minimally invasive coronary artery surgical revascularization. Innovations 2017; 12: 346–350.doi:10.1097/imi.0000000000000401

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28991056

23.

Wang

Zhou

Cai

. Traditional coronary artery bypass graft versus totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft or robot-assisted coronary artery bypass graft--meta-analysis of 16 studies. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2014; 18: 790–797.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24706301

24.

Balkhy

HH.

Nisivaco

Kitahara

et al. Robotic beating heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass in higher-risk patients: can it be done safely? Innovations 2018; 13: 108–113.doi:10.1097/imi.0000000000000481

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29688940

25.

Kitahara

McCrorey

Patel

et al. Benefit of robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass in octogenarians. Innovations 2019; 14: 531–536.doi:10.1177/1556984519876901

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533515

26.

Kitahara

Patel

McCrorey

et al. Morbid obesity does not increase morbidity or mortality in robotic cardiac surgery. Innovations 2017; 12: 434–439.doi:10.1097/imi.0000000000000435

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29232296

27.

Wiedemann

Bonaros

Schachner

et al. Surgical problems and complex procedures: issues for operative time in robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 143: 639–647.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.039

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21719035

28.

Cavallaro

Rhee

AJ.

Chiang

et al. In-hospital mortality and morbidity after robotic coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015; 29: 27–31.doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2014.03.009

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25027106

29.

Rodriguez

Nifong

LW.

Bonatti

et al. Pathway for surgeons and programs to establish and maintain a successful robot-assisted adult cardiac surgery program. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 152: 9–13.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.05.018

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27343904

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

1.21 MB

0.00 MB