AdN.ChengDC.MartinJet al. Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery: a consensus statement of the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2009. Innovations (Phila)2010; 5: 74–83.doi:10.1097/imi.0b013e3181d72939
2.
CalkinsH.HindricksG.CappatoRet al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm2017; 14: e275–e444.doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012
BadhwarV.RankinJS.DamianoRJet al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2017 clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg2017; 103: 329–341.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.076
5.
JeHG.ShumanDJ.AdN. A systematic review of minimally invasive surgical treatment for atrial fibrillation: a comparison of the Cox-maze procedure, beating-heart epicardial ablation, and the hybrid procedure on safety and efficacy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2015; 48: 531–540.doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezu536
6.
CoxJL.AdN. New surgical and catheter-based modifications of the maze procedure. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2000; 12: 68–73.doi:10.1016/S1043-0679(00)70020-7
7.
AdN.CoxJL. Combined mitral valve surgery and the maze III procedure. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2002; 14: 206–209.doi:10.1053/stcs.2002.34395
8.
AdN.HolmesSD.RobertsHGet al. Surgical treatment for stand-alone atrial fibrillation in North America. Ann Thorac Surg2019. Epub ahead of print 17 Aug 2019.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.079
9.
AdN.HolmesSD.FriehlingT. Minimally invasive stand-alone Cox maze procedure for persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: perioperative safety and 5-year outcomes. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol2017; 10: e005352.doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005352
10.
CharitakisE.BarmanoN.WalfridssonUet al. Factors predicting arrhythmia-related symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients referred for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: an observational study (the SMURF study). JACC Clin Electrophysiol2017; 3: 494–502.doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2016.12.004
11.
AdN.HolmesSD.ShumanDJet al. Impact of atrial fibrillation duration on the success of first-time concomitant Cox maze procedures. Ann Thorac Surg2015; 100: 1613–1618.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.105
12.
BrooksS.MetznerA.WohlmuthPet al. Insights into ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: lessons from 6-year clinical outcomes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol2018; 29: 257–263.doi:10.1111/jce.13401
13.
BarnettSD.AdN. Surgical ablation as treatment for the elimination of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2006; 131: 1029–1035.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.10.020
14.
ScherrD.KhairyP.MiyazakiSet al. Five-year outcome of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation using termination of atrial fibrillation as a procedural endpoint. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol2015; 8: 18–24.doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001943
15.
GillinovAM.SaltmanAE. Ablation of atrial fibrillation with concomitant cardiac surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2007; 19: 25–32.doi:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2007.01.002
16.
AdN.HolmesSD.LamontDet al. Left-sided surgical ablation for patients with atrial fibrillation who are undergoing concomitant cardiac surgical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg2017; 103: 58–65.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.093
17.
SchillMR.SinnLA.GreenbergJWet al. A minimally invasive stand-alone Cox-maze procedure is as effective as median sternotomy approach. Innovations (Phila)2017; 12: 186–191.doi:10.1097/imi.0000000000000374
18.
AdN.TianYY.VerbalisJet al. The effect of the maze procedure on the secretion of arginine-vasopressin and aldosterone. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2003; 126: 1095–1100.doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(03)00975-9
19.
AdN.HolmesSD.ShumanDJet al. Amiodarone after surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation: is it really necessary? A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2016; 151: 798–803.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.034
20.
HenryL.DurraniS.HuntSet al. Percutaneous catheter ablation treatment of recurring atrial arrhythmias after surgical ablation. Ann Thorac Surg2010; 89: 1227–1231.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.01.042