GillinovAM.BlackstoneEH.NowickiERet al. Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2008; 135: 885–893.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.11.039
2.
SuriRM.SchaffHV.DearaniJAet al. Survival advantage and improved durability of mitral repair for leaflet prolapse subsets in the current era. Ann Thorac Surg2006; 82: 819–826.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.091
3.
DavidTE.DavidCM.TsangWet al. Long-term results of mitral valve repair for regurgitation due to leaflet prolapse. J Am Coll Cardiol2019; 74: 1044–1053.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.052
4.
BraunbergerE.DelocheA.BerrebiAet al. Very long-term results (more than 20 years) of valve repair with Carpentier’s techniques in nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. Circulation2001; 104(Suppl_1): 8–11.doi:10.1161/01.CIR.104.suppl_1.I-8
5.
CastilloJG.AnyanwuAC.FusterVet al. A near 100% repair rate for mitral valve prolapse is achievable in a reference center: implications for future guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2012; 144: 308–312.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.054
6.
AlfieriO.LapennaE. Systolic anterior motion after mitral valve repair: where do we stand in 2015?Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2015; 48: 344–346.doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezv230
7.
ChikweJ.ItagakiS.AnyanwuAet al. Impact of concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty on tricuspid regurgitation, right ventricular function, and pulmonary artery hypertension after repair of mitral valve prolapse. J Am Coll Cardiol2015; 65: 1931–1938.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.059
8.
GillinovAM.MihaljevicT.JavadikasgariHet al. Early results of robotically assisted mitral valve surgery: analysis of the first 1000 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2018; 155: 82–91.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.037
9.
NifongLW.RodriguezE.ChitwoodWR. 540 consecutive robotic mitral valve repairs including concomitant atrial fibrillation cryoablation. Ann Thorac Surg2012; 94: 38–43.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.11.036
10.
SuriRM.BurkhartHM.DalyRCet al. Robotic mitral valve repair for all prolapse subsets using techniques identical to open valvuloplasty: establishing the benchmark against which percutaneous interventions should be judged. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2011; 142: 970–979.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.027
11.
MurphyDA.MossE.BinongoJet al. The expanding role of endoscopic robotics in mitral valve surgery: 1,257 consecutive procedures. Ann Thorac Surg2015; 100: 1675–1682.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.068
12.
ModiP.HassanA.ChitwoodWR. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2008; 34: 943–952.doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.07.057
13.
FalkV.SeeburgerJ.CzeslaMet al. How does the use of polytetrafluoroethylene neochordae for posterior mitral valve prolapse (loop technique) compare with leaflet resection? A prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2008; 136: 1200–1206.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.07.028
14.
PerierP.HohenbergerW.LakewFet al. Toward a new paradigm for the reconstruction of posterior leaflet prolapse: midterm results of the "respect rather than resect" approach. Ann Thorac Surg2008; 86: 718–725.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.05.015
SuriRM.ClavelMA.SchaffHVet al. Effect of recurrent mitral regurgitation following degenerative mitral valve repair. J Am Coll Cardiol2016; 67: 488–498.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.098
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
