Port Strategies for Robot-Assisted Lobectomy by High-Volume Thoracic Surgeons: A Nationwide Survey

Abstract

Objective

Robot-assisted lobectomy is the fastest growing technique for pulmonary lobectomy, but the diversity of approaches has led to apprehension about port placement among learning surgeons. The aim of this study was to survey high-volume thoracic surgeons who perform robot-assisted lobectomy to understand and consolidate common themes of port placement.

Methods

An electronic online survey was created, and the link was emailed to the 100 highest volume robotic thoracic surgeons in the United States. The survey included an interactive graphical interface, which allowed each respondent to mark the preferential robotic port placement in the chest wall for each of the 5 pulmonary lobectomies. Results were analyzed individually and in aggregate. A heat map was generated to show trends.

Results

One hundred surgeons were surveyed (response rate: 62%). Most (90%) respondents utilized a 4-arm approach and 79% used a completely 4-arm portal approach with CO₂ insufflation. Exact locations for each robotic port were reported by 60% of the surveyed surgeons and the results varied; however, most surgeons generally used the seventh to ninth interspaces for the camera and instruments. The use of multiple different interspace levels was common. Ninety-four percent of respondents used an additional nonrobotic assistant port.

Conclusions

There is not a universal port strategy for robot-assisted lobectomy. However, placement of the camera and robotic ports low in the seventh to ninth interspaces is the most common approach. There are some nuances of stapling port strategies and sequence of port placement, which are identified.

Keywords

port strategies robot-assisted lobectomy lobectomy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Melfi

FM.

Menconi

GF.

Mariani

et al. Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21: 864–868.doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(02)00102-1

DS.

Reddy

RM.

Gorrepati

et al. Robotic-assisted, video-assisted thoracoscopic and open lobectomy: propensity-matched analysis of recent Premier data. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 104: 1733–1740.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.06.020

Dylewski

MR.

Ohaeto

AC.

Pereira

. Pulmonary resection using a total endoscopic robotic video-assisted approach. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 23: 36–42.doi:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2011.01.005

Cerfolio

RJ.

Bryant

AS.

Skylizard

et al. Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 740–746.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.022

Bodner

Wykypiel

Wetscher

et al. First experiences with the da Vinci operating robot in thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 25: 844–851.doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.02.001

Park

BJ.

Flores

RM.

Rusch

. Robotic assistance for video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: technique and initial results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131: 54–59.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.07.031

Cerfolio

Louie

BE.

Farivar

et al. Consensus statement on definitions and nomenclature for robotic thoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 154: 1065–1069.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.02.081

Hansen

HJ.

Petersen

. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy using a standardized three-port anterior approach—the Copenhagen experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 1: 70–76.doi:10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2012.04.15

Smood

Ghanim

Wei

et al. Technical and operational modifications required for evolving robotic programs performing anatomic pulmonary resection. J Robot Surg 2018; 12: 529–534.doi:10.1007/s11701-018-0779-4

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.40 MB

0.00 MB