The 10 Commandments for Aortic Valve Repair

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boodhwani

de Kerchove

Glineur

et al. Repair-oriented classification of aortic insufficiency: impact on surgical techniques and clinical outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137: 286–294.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.054

Boodhwani

El Khoury

. Aortic valve repair: indications and outcomes. Curr Cardiol Rep 2014; 16: 490.doi:10.1007/s11886-014-0490-7

David

TE.

Armstrong

Manlhiot

et al. Long-term results of aortic root repair using the reimplantation technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145(3 Suppl): S22–S25.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.075

Schäfers

H-J

. Aortic valve repair: easy and reproducible? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149: 129–130.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.09.022

Marom

Halevi

Haj-Ali

et al. Numerical model of the aortic root and valve: optimization of graft size and sinotubular junction to annulus ratio. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 146: 1227–1231.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.01.030

Marom

Haj-Ali

Rosenfeld

et al. Aortic root numeric model: annulus diameter prediction of effective height and coaptation in post–aortic valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 406–411.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.080

Schäfers

H-J.

Bierbach

Aicher

. A new approach to the assessment of aortic cusp geometry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132: 436–438.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.04.032

Bierbach

BO.

Aicher

Issa

et al. Aortic root and cusp configuration determine aortic valve function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 38: 400–406.doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.01.060

Schäfers

H-J.

Schmied

Marom

et al. Cusp height in aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 146: 269–274.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.06.053

10.

Schneider

Feldner

SK.

Hofmann

et al. Two decades of experience with root remodeling and valve repair for bicuspid aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 153: S65–S71.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.12.030

11.

Aicher

Kunihara

Abou Issa

et al. Valve configuration determines long-term results after repair of the bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation 2011; 123: 178–185.doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.934679

12.

de Kerchove

Mastrobuoni

Froede

et al. Variability of repairable bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes: towards an anatomical and repair-oriented classification. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. Epub ahead of print 20 Feb 2019. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezz033

13.

Anderson

. Aortic morphology in the setting of the bicuspid aortic valve. Clin Anat 2018; 31: 1215.doi:10.1002/ca.23208

14.

Sabet

HY.

Edwards

WD.

Tazelaar

et al. Congenitally bicuspid aortic valves: a surgical pathology study of 542 cases (1991 through 1996) and a literature review of 2,715 additional cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74: 14–26.doi:10.4065/74.1.14

15.

Ewen

Karliova

Weber

et al. Echocardiographic criteria to detect unicuspid aortic valve morphology. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 20: 40–44.doi:10.1093/ehjci/jex344

16.

Slostad

BD.

Witt

CM.

O'Leary

et al. Diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography and intraoperative surgical inspection of the Unicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 2019; 123: 967–971.doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.12.010

17.

Noly

P-E.

Basmadjian

Bouhout

et al. New insights into unicuspid aortic valve disease in adults: not just a subtype of bicuspid aortic valves. Can J Cardiol 2016; 32: 110–116.doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2015.10.028

18.

Hurwitz

LE.

Roberts

. Quadricuspid semilunar valve. Am J Cardiol 1973; 31: 623–626.doi:10.1016/0002-9149(73)90332-9

19.

Loukas

Bilinsky

et al. The anatomy of the aortic root. Clin Anat 2014; 27: 748–756.doi:10.1002/ca.22295

20.

De Kerchove

Momeni

Aphram

et al. Free margin length and coaptation surface area in normal tricuspid aortic valve: an anatomical study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 53: 1040–1048.doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezx456

21.

Marom

Haj-Ali

Raanani

et al. A fluid-structure interaction model of the aortic valve with coaptation and compliant aortic root. Med Biol Eng Comput 2012; 50: 173–182.doi:10.1007/s11517-011-0849-5

22.

Ward

. Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve. Heart 2000; 83: 81–85.doi:10.1136/heart.83.1.81

23.

Cosgrove

DM.

Rosenkranz

ER.

Hendren

et al. Valvuloplasty for aortic insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 102: 571–576.

24.

Schäfers

H-J.

Aicher

Langer

et al. Preservation of the bicuspid aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83: S740–S745. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.11.017

25.

Schneider

Schmied

Aicher

et al. Sinus plication to improve valve configuration in bicuspid aortic valve Repair-Early results. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 103: 580–585.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.064

26.

Sievers

H-H.

Schmidtke

. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133: 1226–1233.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.039

27.

Anderson

. Understanding the structure of the unicuspid and unicommissural aortic valve. J Heart Valve Dis 2003; 12: 670–673.

28.

Mautner

GC.

Mautner

. Cannon RO 3rd, Hunsberger SA, Roberts WC. Clinical factors useful in predicting aortic valve structure in patients > 40 years of age with isolated valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72: 194–198.

29.

Roberts

CS.

Roberts

. Dissection of the aorta associated with congenital malformation of the aortic valve. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 712–716.doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(10)80188-3

30.

Roberts

WC.

Vowels

TJ.

. Comparison of interpretations of valve structure between cardiac surgeon and cardiac pathologist among adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis (+/- aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103: 1139–1145.doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.12.044

31.

Prêtre

Kadner

Dave

et al. Tricuspidisation of the aortic valve with creation of a crown-like annulus is able to restore a normal valve function in bicuspid aortic valves. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 2006; 29: 1001–1006 doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.01.068

32.

Schäfers

H-J.

Aicher

Riodionycheva

et al. Bicuspidization of the unicuspid aortic valve: a new reconstructive approach. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85: 2012–2018.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.02.081

33.

Aicher

Bewarder

Kindermann

et al. Aortic valve function after bicuspidization of the unicuspid aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95: 1545–1550.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.02.030

34.

Hagendorff

Evangelista

Fehske

et al. Improvement in the assessment of aortic valve and aortic aneurysm repair by 3-dimensional echocardiography. JACC CardiovascImaging 2019. Epub ahead of print 08 Mar 2019. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.06.032.

35.

Schneider

Hofmann

Aicher

et al. Suture annuloplasty significantly improves the durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 103: 504–510.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.072

36.

Matsushima

Karliova

Gauer

et al. Geometry of cusp and root determines aortic valve function. Indian J ThoracCardiovasc Surg. Epub ahead of print 06 Apr 2019. doi:10.1007/s12055-019-00813-2.

37.

Schneider

Schäfers

H-J

. Repair of the bicuspid aortic valve. Oper Tech ThoracCardiovasc Surg 2017; 2017; 22: 91–109.doi:10.1053/j.optechstcvs.2018.02.003

38.

Schäfers

H-J.

Langer

Glombitza

et al. Aortic valve reconstruction in myxomatous degeneration of aortic valves: are fenestrations a risk factor for repair failure? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139: 660–664.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.06.025

39.

Komiya

Shimamoto

Nonaka

et al. Is small cusp size a limitation for aortic valve repair?†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. Epub ahead of print 01 Mar 2019. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezz053.

40.

De Kerchove

Momeni

Aphram

et al. Free margin length and coaptation surface area in normal tricuspid aortic valve: an anatomical study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 53: 1040–1048.doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezx456

41.

Schneider

Feldner

SK.

Hofmann

et al. Two decades of experience with root remodeling and valve repair for bicuspid aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 153: S65–S71.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.12.030

42.

Schäfers

H-J.

Raddatz

Schmied

et al. Reexamining remodeling. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149(2 Suppl): S30–S36.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.09.048

43.

Hammermeister

Sethi

GK.

Henderson

et al. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1152–1158.doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00834-2

44.

Johnson

Stroud

MR.

Kratz

et al. Thirty-year experience with a bileaflet mechanical valve prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 157: 213–222.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.002

45.

Sharabiani

MTA.

Dorobantu

DM.

Mahani

et al. Aortic valve replacement and the Ross operation in children and young adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67: 2858–2870.doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.021

46.

Kvidal

Bergström

Hörte

et al. Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 747–756.doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00584-7

47.

Klieverik

LMA.

Takkenberg

JJM.

Bekkers

et al. The Ross operation: a Trojan horse? Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 1993–2000.doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl550

48.

David

TE.

David

Woo

et al. The Ross procedure: outcomes at 20 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147: 85–94.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.007

49.

Charitos

EI.

Hanke

Stierle

et al. Autograft reinforcement to preserve autograft function after the Ross procedure: a report from the German-Dutch Ross registry. Circulation 2009; 120(11 Suppl): S146–S154.doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.843391

50.

Skillington

PD.

Mokhles

MM.

Takkenberg

JJM

et al. The Ross procedure using autologous support of the pulmonary autograft: techniques and late results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149(2 Suppl): S46–S52.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.068

51.

Matsushima

Abeln

Karliova

et al. Suture annuloplasty and simplified root wrapping in the full root Ross operation. Ann Thorac Surg. Epub ahead of print 21 Dec 2018. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.11.048.

52.

El-Hamamsy

Eryigit

Stevens

L-M

et al. Long-term outcomes after autograft versus homograft aortic root replacement in adults with aortic valve disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 376: 524–531.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60828-8