PuskasJ., ChengD., KnightJ.Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis and consensus statement from the 2004 ISMICS Consensus Conference. Innovations.2005; 1: 3–27.
2.
ShroyerA.L., GroverF.L., HatlerB.; for the Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study Group. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med.2009; 361: 1827–1837.
3.
KhanN.E., De SouzaA., MisterR.A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med.2004; 350: 21–28.
4.
MacGillivrayT.E., VlahakesG.J.Patency and the pump-the risks and benefits of off-pump CABG. N Engl J Med.2004; 350: 3–4.
5.
SongH.K., PetersonR.J., SharoniE.Safe evolution towards routine off-pump coronary bypass: negotiating the learning curve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.2003; 24: 947–952.
6.
ReevesB.C., AscioneR., CaputoM.Morbidity and mortality following acute conversion from off-pump to on-pump coronary surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.2006; 29: 941–947.
7.
JinR., HiratzkaL.F., GrunkemeierG.L.Aborted off-pump coronary artery bypass patients have much worse outcomes than on-pump or successful off-pump patients. Circulation.2005; 112: I332–I337.
8.
EdgertonJ.R., DeweyT.M., MageeM.J.Conversion in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of predictors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg.2003; 76: 1138–1142.
9.
PatelN.C., PatelN.U., LoulmetD.F.Emergency conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass during attempted off-pump revascularization results in increased morbidity and mortality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2004; 128: 655–661.
10.
PuskasJ.D., WilliamsW.H., MahoneyE.M.Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: Early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality of life outcomes. A randomized trial. JAMA.2004; 291: 1841–1849.
11.
PuskasJ.D., KilgoP.D., LattoufO.M.Off-pump coronary bypass provides reduced mortality and morbidity and equivalent 10-year survival. Ann Thorac Surg.2008; 86: 1139–1146.
