GrimshawJ.M., RussellI.T.Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet.1993; 342: 1317–1322.
2.
MerrittT.A., PalmerD., BergmanD.A., ShionoP.H.Clinical practice guidelines in pediatric and newborn medicine implications for their use in practice. Pediatrics.1997; 99: 100–114.
3.
WoolfS.H., GrolR., GutchinsonA.Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ.1999; 318: 527–530.
4.
HibbleA., KankaD., PencheonD.Guidelines in general practice: the new Tower of Babel?BMJ.1998; 317: 862–863.
5.
ShiffmanR.N., ShekellP., OverhageM.Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the conference on guideline standardization. Ann Intern Med.2003; 139: 493–498.
6.
Institute of Medicine.Guidelines for Clinical Practice: From Development to Use.Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1992.
7.
AGREE Collaboration.Appraisal of Guidelines RaEiEACG: guideline development in Europe: an international comparison. Int J Technol Assess Health Care.2000; 16: 1039–1049. (Also available from www.agreecollaboration.org).
8.
CluzeauF.A., LittlejohnsP., GrimshawJ.M.Development and application of a generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelines. J Qual Health Care.1999; 11: 21–28.
9.
PuskasJ.D., ChengD., KnightJ.Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: ISMICS Consensus Conference 2004. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery.2005; 1: 3–27.
10.
AllenK., ChengD.C.H., CohnW.Endoscopic vascular harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a consensus statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery (ISMICS) 2005. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery.2005; 1: 51–60.
11.
ChengD.C.H., AllenK., CohnW.Endoscopic vascular harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials and controlled trials. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery.2005; 1: 61–74.
12.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE).The Guideline Development Process: An Overview for Stakeholders, the Public and the NHS. February 2004. Accessed on November 19, 2006, at www.nice.org.uk.
13.
Institute of Medicine (IOM) Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines.FieldM.J., LohrK.N., editors. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program.Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
14.
CookD.J., MulrowC.D., HaynesR.B.Systematic review: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med.1997; 126: 376–380.
15.
Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al, for the QUOROM Group.Improving the quality of reports of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet.1999; 354: 1896–2000.
16.
Schünemann HJ, Best D, Vist G, Oxman AD, for the GRADE Working Group.Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations. CMAJ.2003; 169: 677–680.
17.
CranneyA., WaldreggerL., GrahamI.Systematic assessment of the quality of osteoporosis guidelines. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord.2002; 3: 20.
18.
BrookR.H., KambergC.J.Appropriateness of the use of cardiovascular procedures: a method and results of this application. Schweiz Med Wochenschr.1993; 123: 249–253.
GrilliR., MagriniN., PennaA.Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet.2000; 255: 103–106.
21.
HaywardR.S., WilsonM.C., TunisS.R.More informative abstracts of articles describing clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med.1993; 118: 731–737.
22.
KahanJ.P., BernsteinS.J., LeapeL.L.Measuring the necessity of medical procedures. Med Care.1994; 32: 357–365.
23.
LavisJ.N., AndersonG.M.Appropriateness in health care delivery: definitions, measurement and policy implications. CMAJ.1996; 154: 321–328.
24.
LittlejohnsP., CluzeauF., BaleR.The quantity and quality of clinical practice guidelines for the management of depression in primary care in the UK. Br J Gen Pract.1999; 49: 205–210.
25.
MurphyM.K., BlackN.A., LampingD.L.Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assessment.1998; 2: 1–83.
26.
ShaneyfeltT.M., Mayo-SmithM.F., RothawanglJ.Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. JAMA.1999; 281: 1900–1905.