GanjaviCEpplerMBPekcanA, et al. Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis. BMJ. 2024;384:e077192. doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-077192.
3.
KamalAH.Do orthopaedics surgeons have any idea what predatory journals are? (cross-sectional study). Heliyon. 2024;10(5):e26448. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26448.
4.
LausmannCWollnyACitakM, et al. Mid-term results of 1-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection with a sinus tract [published online ahead of print February 7, 2024]. HSS J. doi:10.1177/15563316241228267.
5.
LeopoldSSHensingerRNSchoenfeldAJSwiontkowskiMRossiMJTempletonKJ; Sex and Gender Research in Orthopaedic Journals Group. Improving how orthopaedic journals report research outcomes based on sex and gender. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024;106(13):1145–1147. doi:10.2106/JBJS.24.00408.
6.
SimeraIAltmanDGMoherDSchulzKFHoeyJ.Guidelines for reporting health research: the EQUATOR network’s survey of guideline authors. PLoS Med. 2008;5(6):e139. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050139.
7.
ThompsonAAIyerAKotlierJLMayfieldCKPetriglianoFALiuJN. Harms reporting in the RCTs underpinning the AAOS clinical practice guidelines for clavicle fractures [published online ahead of print January 21, 2024]. HSS J. doi:10.1177/15563316231222484.
8.
Van NoordenR. More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023-a new record. Nature. 2023;624(7992):479–481. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-03974-8.