BadhiwalaJHPlattAWitiwCDTraynelisC.Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of rates of adjacent-level surgery to 7-year follow-up. J Spine Surg (Hong Kong). 2020;6:217–232.
2.
BaltusCCostaEVazGRaftopoulosC.Granulomatous reaction on a double-level cervical total disc arthroplasty. World Neurosurg. 2019;122:360–363.
3.
CavanaughDANunleyPDKerrEJWernerDJJawaharA.Delayed hyper-reactivity to metal ions after cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:E262–125.
4.
ClarkNJFrancoisELFreedmanBACurrierB.Early implant failure of a 2-level M6-cervical total disc replacement: a case report. JBJS Case Connect. 2020;10:e1900644.
JacksonRJDavisRJHoffmanGA, et al. Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C cervical disc prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24:734–745.
7.
LauryssenCCoricDDimmigTMusanteDOhnmeissDStubbsHA.Cervical total disc replacement using a novel compressible prosthesis: results from a prospective Food and Drug Administration–regulated feasibility study with 24-month follow-up. Int J Spine Surg. 2012;6:71–77.
PaekSZelentyWDDodoY, et al. Up to 10-year surveillance comparison of survivability in single-level cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in New York. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023;39:206–215.
10.
PastorNieto-MAAlcántaraFBallanoA, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis resulting from a poly(carbonate urethane) chronic haemodialysis central venous catheter. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;72:124–126.
11.
PuntIMAustenSCleutjensJPM, et al. Are periprosthetic tissue reactions observed after revision of total disc replacement comparable to the reactions observed after total hip or knee revision surgery?Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37:150–159.
12.
RadcliffKCoricDAlbertT.Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25:213–224.
13.
ReeksJLiangH.Materials and their failure mechanisms in total disc replacement. Lubricants. 2015;3:346–364.
14.
Scott-YoungMRathboneEGriersonL.Midterm osteolysis-induced aseptic failure of the M6-CTM cervical total disc replacement secondary to polyethylene wear debris. Eur Spine J. 2022;31:1273–1282.
15.
SteibJ-PDufourTBeaurainJBernardPHuppertJ.Observational, multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cervical disk arthroplasty with Mobi-C in the treatment of cervical degenerative disk disease. Results at 10 years follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023;48:452–459.
16.
WahbehJMParkS-HCampbellPEbramzadehESangiorgioSN.The lexicon for periprosthetic bone loss versus osteolysis after cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2022;31:830–842.
17.
WellingtonIJKiaCCoskunE, et al. Cervical and lumbar disc arthroplasty: a review of current implant design and outcomes. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022;9:227.
18.
XiaM-AMWinderMJ.M6-C cervical disc replacement failure associated with late onset infection. J Spine Surg (Hong Kong). 2019;5:584–588.
19.
XuJCGoelCShriverMF, et al. Adverse events following cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review. Glob Spine J. 2018;8:178–189.
20.
ZavrasAGSullivanTBSinghKPhillipsFMColmanMW.Failure in cervical total disc arthroplasty: single institution experience, systematic review of the literature, and proposal of the RUSH TDA failure classification system. Spine J. 2022;22:353–369.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
