A Microcurrent Dressing Reduces Cutibacterium Acnes Colonization in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroplasty or Arthroscopy: A Prospective Case Series

Abstract

Background: Cutibacterium acnes infections in the shoulder remain a significant concern in the setting of shoulder arthroplasty. Purpose: We sought to evaluate the efficacy of a microcurrent dressing in reducing C. acnes skin colonization and thereby reducing the risk of periprosthetic joint infection of the shoulder. Methods: This study was designed as a prospective case series. From October 2017 to February 2019, patients undergoing elective shoulder arthroplasty or arthroscopic shoulder surgery at a major academic medical center were offered enrollment; they signed an informed consent to participate. Patients under the age of 18, scheduled for revision shoulder arthroplasty, or with sensitivity or allergy to silver, zinc, or latex were excluded. Subjects underwent skin culture swab of the shoulder in the mid-point of the planned deltopectoral incision. The JumpStart (Arthrex; Naples, FL) microcurrent dressing was then placed over the area of the planned incision, and a full-thickness skin biopsy was harvested from the incision at the initiation of the surgical procedure. All specimens were cultured for C. acnes by the hospital’s clinical microbiology laboratory with standard anaerobic technique. Results: Thirty-one subjects were enrolled in the study. Those who demonstrated no growth at baseline for the control specimen were excluded from further analysis (N = 11), given the absence of preoperative C. acnes colonization. Culture results from the 20 remaining subjects revealed significantly diminished C. acnes skin growth at the time of surgery compared to baseline. Sixty percent (12 of 20) of the subjects with positive skin swabs at baseline demonstrated no growth in the skin biopsy specimens at the time of surgery. There were no adverse events associated with the application of the microcurrent dressing. Conclusion: This prospective case series found that preoperative application of a microcurrent dressing resulted in significantly diminished C. acnes skin burden at the time of surgery in patients undergoing elective shoulder arthroplasty or arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Further study is warranted to investigate whether this preoperative intervention may contribute to a reduction in perioperative infections, including prosthetic joint infection.

Keywords

shoulder arthroplasty infection prevention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bauer

Parvizi

Kobayashi

Krebs

Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(4):869–882. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.01149.

Chow

Wireless microcurrent-generating antimicrobial wound dressing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a single-center experience. Orthop Rev. 2016;8(2):6296. https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2016.6296.

Coste

Reig

Trojani

Berg

Walch

Boileau

The management of infection in arthroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(1):65–69.

Dizay

Lau

Nottage

WM.

Benzoyl peroxide and clindamycin topical skin preparation decreases Propionibacterium acnes colonization in shoulder arthroscopy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(7):1190–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.003.

Dodson

Craig

Cordasco

, et al. Propionibacterium acnes infection after shoulder arthroplasty: a diagnostic challenge. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(2):303–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.07.065.

Kim

Makin

Skiba

, et al. Antibacterial efficacy testing of a bioelectric wound dressing against clinical wound pathogens. Open Microbiol J. 2014;8:15–21. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874285801408010015.

Kurtz

Lau

Watson

Schmier

Parvizi

Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(suppl 8):61–65.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.022.

Lee

Pottinger

Butler-Wu

Bumgarner

Russ

Matsen

II . Propionibacterium persists in the skin despite standard surgical preparation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(17):1447–1450. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.01474.

Levy

Fenollar

Stein

, et al. Propionibacterium acnes postoperative shoulder arthritis: an emerging clinical entity. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(12):1884–1886. https://doi.org/10.1086/588477.

10.

Patel

Calfee

Plante

Fischer

Green

Propionibacterium acnes colonization of the human shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(6):897–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.023.

11.

Pottinger

Butler-Wu

Neradilek

, et al. Prognostic factors for bacterial cultures positive for Propionibacterium acnes and other organisms in a large series of revision shoulder arthroplasties performed for stiffness, pain, or loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(22):2075–2083. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00861.

12.

Ricchetti

Frangiamore

Grosso

, et al. Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection after shoulder arthroplasty: a critical analysis review. JBJS Reviews. 2013;1(1):e3. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.M.0055.

13.

Sabetta

Rana

Vadasdi

, et al. Efficacy of topical benzoyl peroxide on the reduction of Propionibacterium acnes during shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(7):995–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.003.

14.

Sousa

Carvalho

Pereira

, et al. Economic impact of prosthetic joint infection—an evaluation within the Portuguese National Health System. J Bone Jt Infect. 2018;3(4):197–202. https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.28508.

15.

Sperling

Hawkins

Walch

Mahoney

Zuckerman

JD.

Complications in total shoulder arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2013;62:135–141.

16.

Strickland

Sperling

Cofield

RH.

The results of two-stage re-implantation for infected shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(4):460–465. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20002.

17.

Peng

RY.

Effects and mechanisms of a microcurrent dressing on skin wound healing: a review. Mil Med Res. 2014;1:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/2054-9369-1-24.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB