Abstract
Background: Assessing the extent and specific location of brachial plexus injuries can be difficult given the variety of mechanisms of injury and anatomic complexity of the plexus. We developed a program to accurately assess the location of a patient’s neurologic injury based on electromyographic data. Purpose: We sought to test our hypothesis that the location of traumatic brachial plexopathies could be accurately assessed with a novel program that processed electromyogram (EMG) and mechanism of injury data. Methods: This retrospective diagnostic cohort study was carried out with a novel diagnostic algorithm developed with the Python programming language. The program accepts user input of muscles demonstrating decreased motor unit recruitment, positive sharp waves, or fibrillation potentials. The testing data set was derived from a registry of brachial plexus injuries treated at our center. The primary outcome was the percent concordance of the algorithm’s diagnosis with the surgical diagnosis. Results: Ninety-five cases met the inclusion criteria. Median time from injury onset to EMG examination was 4 months; median time from EMG examination to surgery was 1.2 months. The program diagnosis matched the surgical diagnosis in 92 out of 95 (97%) of cases, including cases with multilevel injuries and additional peripheral nerve injuries. Conclusion: This program accurately localized brachial plexopathies in nearly all cases, including those involving polytrauma or complex patterns of injury. This algorithm may be valuable as an aid to complete electrodiagnostic examinations, a diagnostic adjunct when planning treatment of severe plexus palsies, or an educational tool.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
