Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into research presents emerging ethical and governance challenges for institutions overseeing human research. While existing frameworks provide general protections, they offer limited guidance for addressing AI-specific risks related to informed consent, transparency, data privacy, and fairness. This commentary synthesizes key ethical concerns associated with AI-enabled research and examines some implications for institutional policy development and research ethics review. Rather than proposing a comprehensive evaluative framework, this invited commentary examines governance and procedural gaps that complicate implementation of existing AI oversight resources and emphasizes institution-level policy approaches to support consistent, responsible research ethics review. An illustrative example is provided to demonstrate how the absence of clear policy guidance can create ambiguity in research ethics review and researcher practice. The ethical considerations discussed apply broadly to research ethics review systems internationally, including Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Research Ethics Committees (RECs), and Ethics Review Committees (ERCs).

Keywords

Informed consent research ethics review artificial intelligence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bostrom

Yudkowsky

(2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence. In Frankish

Ramsey

W. M.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence (pp. 316–334). Cambridge University Press.

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). (2016). International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. CIOMS. https://cioms.ch/publications/product/international-ethical-guidelines-for-health-related-research-involving-humans/

Dankwa-Mullan

(2024). Health equity and ethical considerations in using artificial intelligence in public health and medicine. Preventing Chronic Disease, 21, E64. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd21.240245

Emanuel

E. J.

Wendler

Grady

(2008). An ethical framework for biomedical research. In Emanuel

E. J.

Grady

Crouch

R. A.

Lie

R. K.

Miller

F. G.

Wendler

(Eds.), The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 123–133). Oxford University Press.

Jobin

Ienca

Vayena

(2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

Makridis

C. A.

Boese

Fricks

Workman

Klote

Mueller

Hildebrandt

I. J.

Kim

Alterovitz

(2023). Informing the ethical review of human subjects research utilizing artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Computer Science, 5, 1235226. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1235226

Mittelstadt

B. D.

Allo

Taddeo

Wachter

Floridi

(2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716679679. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679

Morley

Machado

C. C.

Burr

Cowls

Joshi

Taddeo

Floridi

(2020). The ethics of AI in health care: A mapping review. Social Science & Medicine, 260, 113172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113172

Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard. (2023). Framework for review of clinical research involving artificial intelligence. https://mrctcenter.org/ai/

10.

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report

11.

Samuel

Wassenaar

D. R.

(2025). Joint editorial: Informed consent and AI transcription of qualitative data. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 20(1-2), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646241296712

12.

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics

13.

Zook

Barocas

Boyd

Crawford

Keller

Gangadharan

S. P.

Goodman

Hollander

Koenig

B. A.

Metcalf

Narayanan

Nelson

Pasquale

(2017). Ten simple rules for responsible big data research. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(3), e1005399. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005399

Artificial Intelligence in Human Participant Research: Ethical Risks and Institutional Policy Considerations

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References