Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2025-12
Ethics Compliance in Sub-Saharan African Higher Education Research (ECiSHER) Involving Human Participants: A Systematic Review of a Decade of Literature
This study systematically reviews literature on ethics compliance in human-participant research within Sub-Saharan African (SSA) higher education, guided by PRISMA and based on 58 studies. Over half of the studies (32; 55.2%) employed qualitative methods to explore ethics in human-participant research. Research output was lowest in 2017 (1 study; 1.7%) and peaked in 2024 (12; 20.7%). South Africa contributed the most studies (13; 22.4%), followed by Nigeria (9; 15.5%), while Benin, Botswana, Ghana, Mali, Rwanda, and Zimbabwe each produced one (1.7%). The dominant challenge identified was the inconsistent application of ethical guidelines (56; 96.5%). Strengthening institutional ethics policies was the most frequent recommendation (51; 94.4%), while digitalisation of ethics review processes emerged as a significant trend (43; 74.8%). Capacity building for research ethics committees (RECs) and institutional review boards (IRBs) was highlighted. Harmonising ethical standards and providing targeted training to strengthen ethics governance in SSA higher education research were recommended.
AdjoviI. S. M. (2025). A worldwide itinerary of research ethics in science for a better social responsibility and justice: A bibliometric analysis and review. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 10(1), 1504937. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1504937. PMid:40012693 PMCid:PMC11850331
2.
Anane-SarpongE.WangmoT.TannerM. (2020). Ethical principles for promoting health research data sharing with sub-saharan Africa. Developing World Bioethics, 20(2), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12233. PMid:31115148
3.
AndandaP.MlotshwaL. (2024). Streamlining the ethical-legal governance of cross-border health data sharing during global health emergencies. Research Ethics, 20(4), 812–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241261907
4.
AntwiwaahF.AsamoahB. (2021). challenges of the research management office in higher educational institutions (HEIS): Local and Global Perspectives.
5.
AppiahD.DuutJ. D. M.Adu-GyebiC. (2025). Public availability of research integrity policies in leading African universities. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09600-8
6.
BarchiF.MatlhagelaK.JonesN.KebaabetsweP. M.MerzJ. F. (2015). The keeping is the problem": A qualitative study of IRB-member perspectives in Botswana on the collection, use, and storage of human biological samples for research. BMC medical Ethics, 16(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0047-3. PMid:26286519 PMCid:PMC4544805
7.
Canario GuzmánJ. A.EspinalR.BáezJ.MelgenR. E.RosarioP. A. P.MendozaE. R. (2017). Ethical challenges for international collaborative research partnerships in the context of the Zika outbreak in the Dominican Republic: A qualitative case study. Health Research Policy and Systems, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0246-0. PMid:28946911 PMCid:PMC5613490
8.
CengizN.KabandaS. M.EsterhuizenT. M.MoodleyK. (2023). Exploring perspectives of research ethics committee members on the governance of big data in sub-Saharan Africa. South African journal of science, 119(5-6). https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2023/14905. PMid:39324015 PMCid:PMC11423559
9.
ChimeO.EzeomeE. (2025). Content and readability of informed consent documents approved by research ethics committees of health institutions in south-east Nigeria. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 20(1), 15562646251350200–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251350200
10.
DaviesS. E. (2020). The introduction of research ethics review procedures at a university in South Africa: Review outcomes of a social science research ethics committee. Research Ethics, 16(1-2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119898408
11.
DembuH. S.GetachewH.PriceP. J.SalesJ.WassieL. (2025). Perspectives of research ethics committees on the challenges of human genomic research participation in Ethiopia. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (1), 15562646251339221.
12.
DodooJ. E.Al-SamarraieH.AlzahraniA. I.LonsdaleM.AlalwanN. (2024). Digital innovations for occupational safety: Empowering workers in hazardous environments. Workplace Health and Safety, 72(3), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799231215811
13.
DodsworthS.CheesemanN. (2018). The potential and pitfalls of collaborating with development organizations and policy makers in Africa. African Affairs, 117(466), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adx041
14.
EssackZ.NdebeleP.MatisonnH.de VriesH.MoodleyK.RennieS.AliJ.KassN.IJsselmuidenC.MkhizeN.KrugerM.StrodeA.FreedmanW.WassenaarD.R. (2025). Health research ethics in Southern Africa: Building capacity and cultivating excellence. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251347549
15.
EwuosoO. C. (2016). Bioethics education in Nigeria and West Africa: Historical beginnings and impacts. Global Bioethics, 27(2-4), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2016.1192448
16.
FergusonK.AdebamowoC.AdejumoA. O.OgundiranT.AliyuM. H.GordonE. J.IliyasuZ.AgulannaC.AdamuS. U.AdeyemoO.EzugwuE. C. (2025). Strengthening research ethics capacity in West Africa, 2015–2024. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (1), 15562646251335076. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251335076
17.
FerrettiA.IencaM.VelardeM. R.HurstS.VayenaE. (2022). The challenges of big data for research ethics committees: A qualitative Swiss study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(1-2), 129–143. PMid:34779661 PMCid:PMC8721531. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211053538
18.
FitsilisP.DamasiotisV.DervenisC.KyriatzisV.TsoutsaP. (2024). Effective Data Stewardship in Higher Education: Skills, Competences, and the Emerging Role of Open Data Stewards (1). arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.20361.
19.
GonsalvesC. (2024). Addressing student non-compliance in AI use declarations: Implications for academic integrity and assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education50(1), 1–15.
20.
HeadG. (2020). Ethics in educational research: Review boards, ethical issues and researcher development. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118796315
21.
HlongwaP. (2016). Current ethical issues in HIV/AIDS research and HIV/AIDS care. Oral Diseases, 22(S1), 61–65. PMid:27109274. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12391
22.
HoeyerK.DahlagerL.LynöeN. (2005). Conflicting notions of research ethics: The mutually challenging traditions of social scientists and medical researchers. Social Science & Medicine, 61(8), 1741–1749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.03.026. PMid:16029775
23.
KlitzmanR. (2011). The ethics police?: IRBs’ views concerning their power. PLoS ONE, 6(12), e28773. PMid:22174893 PMCid:PMC3236766. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028773
24.
KnightJ. (2023). Evaluating the impacts of a research ethics training course on university researchers. Social Sciences, 12(3), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12030182
25.
LakeD.WendlandJ. (2018). Practical, epistemological, and ethical challenges of participatory action research: A cross-disciplinary review of the literature. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 22(3), 11–42.
26.
LiZ.DhruvA.JainV. (2024). Ethical considerations in the use of AI for higher education: A comprehensive guide. In 2024 IEEE 18th international conference on semantic computing (ICSC) (pp. 218–223). IEEE.
27.
LimW. M. (2024). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(4), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264622
28.
LolasF.RodriguezE.Pinto-CisternasJ. (2006). Research ethics committees in Latin America: The urgency of institutional development. Acta Bioethica, 12(2), 187–192.
29.
Madikizela-MadiyaN. (2022). Relational research ethics and disengagement from collaborative research projects in higher education: A conceptual analysis. South African Journal of Higher Education, 36(5), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.20853/36-5-4805
30.
MaringeF.NdofirepiA. P. (2023). Growth in research production and postgraduate training in African universities: Trends, challenges, and prospects. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 26(4), 34–48.
31.
McGrailE.McGrailJ. P. (2015). Exploring web-based university policy statements on plagiarism by research-intensive higher education institutions. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(2), 167–196.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9229-3
32.
MirekuD. O.BervellB. (2024). A decade of quality assurance in higher education (QAiHE) within sub-saharan Africa: A literature review based on a systematic search approach. Higher Education, 87(5), 1271–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01064-2
33.
MwakaE.HornL. (2019). Researchers’ perspectives on informed consent and ethical review of biobank research in South Africa: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(4), 307–317. PMid:31378129 PMCid:PMC6733622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619866991
NdebeleP.WassenaarD.BenatarS.FleischerT.KrugerM.AdebamowoC.MeslinE. M. (2014). Research ethics capacity building in sub-saharan Africa: A review of NIH fogarty-funded programs 2000–2012. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(2), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2014.9.2.24
36.
NicholA. A.BendavidE.MutenherwaF.PatelC.ChoM. K. (2021). Diverse experts’ perspectives on ethical issues of using machine learning to predict HIV/AIDS risk in sub-Saharan Africa: A modified Delphi study. BMJ open, 11(7), e052287. PMid:34321310 PMCid:PMC8320245. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052287
37.
ObinnaA. J.Kess-MomohA. J. (2024). Comparative technical analysis of legal and ethical frameworks in AI-enhanced procurement processes. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 22(1), 1415–1430. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.22.1.1241
38.
ObioraO. L.SheadD. A.OlivierB. (2024). Data sharing considerations and practice among health researchers in Africa: A scoping review. Digital Health, 10(4), 20552076241290955. PMid:39493630 PMCid:PMC11528796. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241290955
39.
OgunrinO. A.DanielF.AnsaV. (2016). Knowledge of the Nigerian code of health research ethics among biomedical researchers in Southern Nigeria. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(5), 397–407. PMid:27241870. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616650072
40.
OrievuluK.HingaA.NkosiB.NgwenyaN.SeeleyJ.AkanluA.KamuyaD. (2024). A scoping review of ethics review processes during public health emergencies in Africa. BMC medical Ethics, 25(1), 63. PMid:38778293 PMCid:PMC11110293. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01054-8
41.
PramjeethS.RamgovindP. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in higher education: A moral compass for the future?African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v6i1.1560
42.
SehlabakaL. G. (2023). An analysis of ethics compliance challenges within strained healthcare systems: the case of South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University).
43.
ShamseerL.MoherD.ClarkeM.GhersiD.LiberatiA.PetticrewM.ShekelleP.StewartL. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. Bmj, 349(1), g7647–g7647. PMid:25555855. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
44.
StrechD.SynofzikM.MarckmannG. (2008). How do ethics committees and their chairpersons evaluate ethics consultation services? A survey of German research ethics committees. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(8), 582–587. PMid:18511623.
45.
UcheN. J.OkoyeO. I.EzeomeE. R. (2025). Ethical issues in glaucoma genomic research: Perspectives and preferences of potential research participants in enugu, southeast Nigeria. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (1), 15562646251337654. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251337654
46.
UlrichC. M.AliJ.AndersonE. E.IjsselmuidenC.KassN.MunirK.WassenaarD. (2025). Advancing doctoral and postdoctoral international bioethics training programs. supported by the D43 National Institutes of Health Fogarty mechanism. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (1).https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251342882 may also be relevant.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
