Virtual reality (VR) can offer unique advantages for studying how individuals respond to stressful events, including racial discrimination, but the ethics of using VR in this context remain underexplored. We briefly review possible scientific benefits and risks of using VR to examine racial discrimination. We also report results from 130 participants of color (Mage = 24.21, 49.2% women) who completed a VR experiment where they were assigned to either a racial discrimination or daily hassle condition. Participants exposed to the racial discrimination simulation recalled greater stress than their counterparts, but groups did not differ on whether they thought the VR experience was more or less intense than the same interaction presented using other research methods, such as reading vignettes or watching videos. Participants reported feeling ethically treated and shared their perspectives on the risks and benefits of VR-based research. We discuss ethical, educational, and research implications for using VR in discrimination research.
AgnewC. R.CarterJ. J.ImamiL. (2022). Forming Meaningful Connections Between Strangers in Virtual Reality: Comparing Affiliative Outcomes by Interaction Modality.
2.
American-Psychological-Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
3.
BanosR. M.BotellaC.PerpinaC.AlcanizM.LozanoJ. A.OsmaJ.GallardoM. (2002). Virtual reality treatment of flying phobia. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 6(3), 206–212. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2002.802380
4.
BehrK.-M.NosperA.KlimmtC.HartmannT. (2005). Some practical considerations of ethical issues in VR research. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 14(6), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474605775196535
5.
DamianoS. R.McLeanS. A.NguyenL.YagerZ.PaxtonS. J. (2020). Do we cause harm? Understanding the impact of research with young children about their body image. Body Image, 34, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.05.008
6.
DeprinceA. P.ChuA. (2008). Perceived benefits in trauma research: Examining methodological and individual difference factors in responses to research participation. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2008.3.1.35
7.
DonkerT.CorneliszI.van KlaverenC.van StratenA.CarlbringP.CuijpersP.van GelderJ.-L. (2019). Effectiveness of self-guided app-based virtual reality cognitive behavior therapy for acrophobia: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 76(7), 682–690. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0219
8.
EmanuelE. J.WendlerD.GradyC. (2008). An ethical framework for biomedical research. In E. J. Emanuel, C. Grady, & R. A. Crouch (Eds.), Textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 123–135).
9.
EmmerC.DornJ.MataJ. (2024). The immediate effect of discrimination on mental health: A meta-analytic review of the causal evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 150(3), 215–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000419
10.
EnglishD.LambertS. F.TynesB. M.BowlegL.ZeaM. C.HowardL. C. (2020). Daily multidimensional racial discrimination among Black US American adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101068
11.
FreedmanG.GreenM. C.SeidmanM.FlanaganM. (2021). The Effect of Embodying a Woman Scientist in Virtual Reality on Men’s Gender Biases.
12.
GriffinM. G.ResickP. A.WaldropA. E.MechanicM. B. (2003). Participation in trauma research: Is there evidence of harm?Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16(3), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023735821900
13.
GroomV.BailensonJ.NassC. (2009). The influence of racial embodiment on racial bias in immersive virtual environments. Social Influence, 4(3), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510802643750
14.
GuyllM.MatthewsK. A.BrombergerJ. T. (2001). Discrimination and unfair treatment: Relationship to cardiovascular reactivity among African American and European American women. Health Psychology, 20(5), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.20.5.315
15.
HillC. E. (2015). Consensual qualitative research (CQR): Methods for conducting psychotherapy research. In GeloO. C. G.PritzA.RiekenB. (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Foundations, process, and outcome (pp. 485–499). Springer-Verlag Publishing.
16.
HillC. E.KnoxS.ThompsonB. J.WilliamsE. N.HessS. A.LadanyN. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196
17.
HuynhV. W.HuynhQ.-L.SteinM.-P. (2017). Not just sticks and stones: Indirect ethnic discrimination leads to greater physiological reactivity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 23(3), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000138
18.
JosephN. T.PetersonL. M.GordonH.KamarckT. W. (2021). The double burden of racial discrimination in daily-life moments: Increases in negative emotions and depletion of psychosocial resources among emerging adult African Americans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 27(2), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000337
19.
JourilesE. N.McDonaldR.KullowatzA.RosenfieldD.GomezG. S.CuevasA. (2009). Can virtual reality increase the realism of role plays used to teach college women sexual coercion and rape-resistance skills?Behavior Therapy, 40(4), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2008.09.002
20.
JourilesE. N.McDonaldR.RosenfieldD.SargentK. S. (2019). Increasing bystander behavior to prevent adolescent relationship violence: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000355
21.
JourilesE. N.Simpson RoweL.McDonaldR.PlattC. G.GomezG. S. (2011). Assessing women's responses to sexual threat: Validity of a virtual role-play procedure. Behavior Therapy, 42(3), 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.11.005
22.
KassnerM. P.WesselmannE. D.LawA. T.WilliamsK. D. (2012). Virtually ostracized: Studying ostracism in immersive virtual environments. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 15(8), 399–403. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0113
KorousK. M.CausadiasJ. M.CasperD. M. (2017). Racial discrimination and cortisol output: A meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 193(Supplement C), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.042
26.
LuiP. P. (2020). Racial microaggression, overt discrimination, and distress: (in)Direct associations with psychological adjustment. The Counseling Psychologist, 48(4), 551–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000020901714
27.
LuiP. P.GobrialS.StringerE.JourilesE. N. (2025). Effects of racial discrimination on stress, negative emotions, and alcohol craving: A registered report of a virtual reality experiment. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 31(2), 296–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000636
28.
LuiP. P.StringerE.JourilesE. N. (2023). Advancing knowledge on the health consequences of discrimination: The potential of virtual reality. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 29(1), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000460
29.
MadaryM.MetzingerT. K. (2016). Real Virtuality: A Code of Ethical Conduct. Recommendations for Good Scientific Practice and the Consumers of VR-Technology [Review]. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00003
30.
NeblettE. W.Jr. (2019). Racism and health: Challenges and future directions in behavioral and psychological research. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 25(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000253
31.
NeblettE. W.RobertsS. O.Jr. (2013). Racial identity and autonomic responses to racial discrimination. Psychophysiology, 50(10), 943–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12087
32.
NewmanE.RischE.Kassam-AdamsN. (2006). Ethical issues in trauma-related research: A review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(3), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2006.1.3.29
33.
RawskiS. L.FosterJ. R.BailensonJ. (2022). Sexual Harassment Bystander Training Effectiveness: Experimentally Comparing 2D Video to Virtual Reality Practice.
34.
RichmanL. S.BennettG. G.PekJ.SieglerI.WilliamsR. B.Jr. (2007). Discrimination, dispositions, and cardiovascular responses to stress. Health Psychology, 26(6), 675–683. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.6.675
35.
RichmanL. S.PekJ.PascoeE.BauerD. J. (2010). The effects of perceived discrimination on ambulatory blood pressure and affective responses to interpersonal stress modeled over 24 h. Health Psychology, 29(4), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019045
36.
RoweL. S.JourilesE. N.McDonaldR. (2015). Reducing sexual victimization among adolescent girls: A randomized controlled pilot trial of my voice, my choice. Behavior Therapy, 46(3), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2014.11.003
37.
SaredakisD.SzpakA.BirckheadB.KeageH. A. D.RizzoA.LoetscherT. (2020). Factors associated with virtual reality sickness in head-mounted displays: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00096
38.
SeatonE. K.ZeidersK. H. (2021). Daily racial discrimination experiences, ethnic-racial identity, and diurnal cortisol patterns among black adults. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 27(1), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000367
39.
SlaterM.Gonzalez-LiencresC.HaggardP.VinkersC.Gregory-ClarkeR.JelleyS.WatsonZ.BreenG.SchwarzR.SteptoeW.SzostakD.HalanS.FoxD.SilverJ. (2020). The Ethics of Realism in Virtual and Augmented Reality [Opinion]. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 1(1), https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.00001
40.
SpanglerP. T.LiuJ.HillC. E. (2012). Consensual qualitative research for simple qualitative data: An introduction to CQR-M. In HillC. E. (Ed.), Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena (pp. 269–283). American Psychological Association.
41.
SpiegelJ. S. (2018). The ethics of virtual reality technology: Social hazards and public policy recommendations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), 1537–1550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9979-y
42.
TorresL.OngA. D. (2010). A daily diary investigation of latino ethnic identity, discrimination, and depression. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(4), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020652
WendlerD.MillerF. G. (2008). Risk-Benefit Analysis and the Net Risks Test. In The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195168655.003.0048
45.
WhalleyL. J. (1995). Ethical issues in the application of virtual reality to medicine. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 25(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4825(95)00008-R
46.
WilliamsD. R.MohammedS. A. (2013). Racism and health I: Pathways and scientific evidence. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(8), 1152–1173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213487340
47.
WilsonM. (2014). Neurocognitive and whole-system reactions to covert racial discrimination-induced stress. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
48.
YellowleesP. M.HollowayK. M.ParishM. B. (2012). Therapy in virtual environments—clinical and ethical issues. Telemedicine and e-Health, 18(7), 558–564. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2011.0195
49.
YuI.MortensenJ.KhannaP.SpanlangB.SlaterM. (2012). Visual realism enhances realistic response in an immersive virtual environment–part 2. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 32(6), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcg.2012.121
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
