The scope of medical training has expanded to encompass clinical skills and the ability to conduct and interpret scientific research. Therefore, medical students must develop an awareness of research and publication ethics to advance in their careers. This study aimed to understand medical students’ perceptions of their first encounter with a research ethics committee. Qualitative methods were used to conduct three focus group interviews with students, and the data were thematically analysed. Findings revealed that the students had limited knowledge prior to their encounters, initially found the experience instructive yet challenging and negative, and later recognised its value. Students suggested enhancements to the practical and functional aspects of ethics committees and emphasised the need for ethics counselling in research.
AndersonM. S.HornA. S.RisbeyK. R.RonningE. A.De VriesR.MartinsonB. C. (2007). Education in the responsible conduct of research what do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists’ misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 853–860. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f764c
BalmerD. F.RichardsB. F. (2022). Longitudinal qualitative research in medical education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 6(5), 306–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0374-9
4.
BalonR.GuerreroA. P. S.CoverdaleJ. H.BrennerA. M.LouieA. K.BeresinE. V.RobertsL. W. (2019, June 15). Institutional Review Board approval as an educational tool. Academic Psychiatry, 43(3), 285–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-019-01027-9
5.
BergmannC.MuthT.LoerbroksA. (2019). Medical students’ perceptions of stress due to academic studies and its interrelationships with other domains of life: A qualitative study. Medical Education Online, 24(1), 1603526. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1603526
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
8.
BrownC.SpiroJ.QuintonS. (2020). The role of research ethics committees: Friend or foe in educational research? An exploratory study. British Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 747–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3654
9.
ButlerA. E.VincentK.Bluebond-LangnerM. (2020). Insights into the perception that research ethics committees are a barrier to research with seriously ill children: A study of committee minutes and correspondence with researchers studying seriously ill children. Palliative Medicine, 34(3), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319885566
10.
CarberryC.McCombeG.TobinH.StokesD.LastJ.BuryG.CullenW. (2021). Curriculum initiatives to enhance research skills acquisition by medical students: A scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 312. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02754-0
11.
CarlineJ. D.O’sullivanP. S.GruppenL. D.Richardson-NassifK. (2007). Crafting successful relationships with the IRB. Academic Medicine, 82(10 (Suppl)), S57–S60. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31813e66d4
12.
CartwrightJ. C.HickmanS. E.NelsonC. A.KnaflK. A. (2013). Investigators’ successful strategies for working with institutional review boards. Research in Nursing and Health, 36(5), 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21553
13.
Committee on Publication Ethics. (2022). Ethics toolkit for a successful editorial office: A COPE guide. https://doi.org/10.24318/AkFpEBd1
14.
DroletM. J.Rose-DerouinE.LeblancJ. C.RuestM.Williams-JonesB. (2023). Ethical issues in research: Perceptions of researchers, research ethics board members and research ethics experts. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(2), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09455-3
FavarettoM.De ClercqE.BrielM.ElgerB. S. (2020). Working through ethics review of big data research projects: An investigation into the experiences of Swiss and American researchers. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264620935223
17.
FuerholzerK.SchochowM.StegerF. (2020). Good scientific practice: Developing a curriculum for medical students in Germany. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(1), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0076-7
GutaA.NixonS.GahaganJ.FieldenS. (2012). “Walking along beside the researcher”: How Canadian REBs/ IRBs are responding to the needs of community-based participatory research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2012.7.1.17
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2022). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals.
22.
KemahliS.DökmeciF.PalaoǧluÖAktuǧT.ArdaB.Demirel-YilmazE.KarahanT.ÖzyurdaF.AkanH.AyhanI. H. (2004). How we derived a core curriculum: From institutional to national - Ankara University experience. Medical Teacher, 26(4), 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590410001679433
McMurphyS.LewisJ.BoulosP. (2013). Extending the olive branch: Enhancing communication and trust between research ethics committees and qualitative researchers. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(4), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.28
25.
MjølstadB. P.GetzL. O. (2023). ‘They never mentioned this in medical school!’ A qualitative analysis of medical students’ reflective writings from general practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 41(4), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2023.2263486
26.
MumfordM. D.ConnellyS.BrownR. P.MurphyS. T.HillJ. H.AntesA. L.WaplesE. P.DevenportL. D. (2008). A sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 18(4), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420802487815
27.
NichollsS. G.HayesT. P.BrehautJ. C.McDonaldM.WeijerC.SaginurR.FergussonD. (2015). A scoping review of empirical research relating to quality and effectiveness of research ethics review. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0133639. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133639
28.
SwazeyJ. P.AndersonM. S.LewisK. S. (1993). Ethical problems in academic research. American Scientist, 81(6), 542–553.
29.
Thompson BurdineJ.ThorneS.SandhuG. (2021). Interpretive description: A flexible qualitative methodology for medical education research. Medical Education, 55(3), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14380
30.
WaldH. S. (2015). Professional identity (trans)formation in medical education: Reflection, relationship, resilience. Academic Medicine, 90(6), 701–706. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000731
31.
WaldH. S.WhiteJ.ReisS. P.EsquibelA. Y.AnthonyD. (2019). Grappling with complexity: Medical students’ reflective writings about challenging patient encounters as a window into professional identity formation. Medical Teacher, 41(2), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1475727
32.
World Medical Association (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
33.
WuC. M.SchulzE.PleskacT. J.SpeekenbrinkM. (2022). Time pressure changes how people explore and respond to uncertainty. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 4122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07901-1
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
