Reporting Ethics Approval in Articles on Criminality. An Audit of Adherence to Swedish Legislation

Abstract

According to the Swedish Ethics Review Act, research involving personal data on crimes should undergo independent ethics review. To explore the reporting of ethics approval, we extracted information from articles with Swedish personal data on crimes published in 2013–2021. Of the identified 298 articles, 92 (31%) failed to report ethics approval. Failures were particularly common in articles with a qualitative design, single or few authors and when there was a social science focus. Failures varied markedly between universities. We conclude that failures to report compulsory ethics approval are common in articles involving personal data on crime and that these failures vary markedly with the research setting. Several indicators of poor adherence to the Ethics Review Act have been identified.

Keywords

research ethics ethics approval crime criminal law convictions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asplund

Hulter Åsberg

(2021). Reporting ethical approval in health and social science articles: An audit of adherence to GDPR and national legislation. BMC Medical Ethics, 22(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00664-w

Block

M. I.

Khitin

L. M.

Sade

R. M.

(2006). Ethical process in human research published in thoracic surgery journals. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 82(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.01.084

Cameron

(2019). Etikprövning av rättsdogmatisk forskning [Ethical review of law research]. In Swedish. Förvaltningsrättslig Tidskrift, (1), 31–47. urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-397486

Clarivate. (2022). Web of Science. [Cited 3 November 2022]. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/web-of-science/

Dingemann

Ure

(2011). Failure to report ethical approval and informed consent in paediatric surgical publications. European Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 21(4), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1277145

Dingwall

(2012). How did we ever get into this mess? The rise of ethical regulation in the social sciences. In Love

(Ed.), Ethics in social research (studies in qualitative methodology (Vol. 12, pp. 3–26). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, 59, 1–88. [ https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3e485e15-11bd-11e6-ba9a-01aa75ed71a1]

Journal Citations Reports. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/journal-citation-reports/

Nicholls

S. G.

Brehaut

Saginur

(2012). Social science and ethics review: A question of practice not principle. Research Ethics, 8, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016112445435

10.

Oakes

J. M.

(2002). Risks and wrongs in social science research. An evaluator's guide to the IRB. Evaluation Review, 26(5), 443–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016112445435

11.

Pitak-Arnnop

Sader

Herve

Dhanuthai

Bertrand

J. C.

Hemprich

(2009). Reporting of ethical protection in recent oral and maxillofacial surgery research involving human subjects. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 38(7), 707–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.01.018

12.

Schrag

Z. M.

(2011)). The case against ethics review in the social sciences. Research Ethics, 7, 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611100700402

13.

Schroter

Plowman

Hutchings

, et al. (2006). Reporting ethics committee approval and patient consent by study design in five general medical journals. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(12), 718–723. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.015115

14.

Sharpe

(2017). Sociological stalking? Methods, ethics and power in longitudinal criminological research. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 17, 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895816669214

15.

Swedish Parliament. (2003). Lag (2003:460) om etikprövning av forskning som avser människor [Act on ethics review of human research], in Swedish. Revised 2019. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-2003460-om-etikprovning-av-forskning-som_sfs-2003-460

16.

Temel

M. K.

(2022). A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of ethical protections in medical apers published in Turkey. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(4), 504–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221108600

17.

Uecker

Ure

B. M.

Dingemann

(2020). Ethical publication standards in articles reporting on novel surgical methods: Analysis of three pediatric surgical journals. European Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 31(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715611

18.

Howarth

Zhou

, et al. (2019). Reporting of ethical approval and informed consent in clinical research published in leading nursing journals: A retrospective observational study. BMC Medical Ethics, 20(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0431-5